Germany: Snubbing Obama?

scratch

Senate Member
May 20, 2008
5,658
22
38
Obama vows to end US role in Iraq

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7507929.stm
---------------------------------------------------------------
He has the statue and grace of a leader!

When will it hit you that the man is a fraud. When will it hit you that (if elected) he will only be a figure head or a front man to the puppet masters.
Only the names change but not the policy of the real government.
Truly sad IMO.

 

dancing-loon

House Member
Oct 8, 2007
2,739
36
48
When will it hit you that the man is a fraud. When will it hit you that (if elected) he will only be a figure head or a front man to the puppet masters.
Only the names change but not the policy of the real government.
Truly sad IMO.
Yes, that is the sad part, there will be no variety, no fresh ideas... they all have to follow along the trench. But I want to believe that Obama could and would bring some positive change to the US, once he actually has become president. I find he promises too much already beforehand, that is not very smart, because then he has to stick to it or be called a liar.

Let's drink tea and wait!
 

scratch

Senate Member
May 20, 2008
5,658
22
38
Yes, that is the sad part, there will be no variety, no fresh ideas... they all have to follow along the trench. But I want to believe that Obama could and would bring some positive change to the US, once he actually has become president. I find he promises too much already beforehand, that is not very smart, because then he has to stick to it or be called a liar.

Let's drink tea and wait!

I will agree to that suggestion!
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
Berlin got freed from fascism by soviet troops only, what carried the major burden of the war. D-Day came just to save a proper piece of the self offered cake Germany, still thankful because it saved much more lives and duration of the total war.

As much as I do like to correctly point out that the Soviets did carry the burden and D-day was a diversion (A good one mind you).

The war was still won by America, it supplies the soviets and kept them from breaking, and more importantly were its actions against Romania and its oil supply to the Germans.

The germans had plenty of armoured units sitting unused at the end of the war, fuel was the problem.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
What a disappointment! I couldn't have imagined the German Christians are such narrow-minded bickering stuck-up bloated nitwits!!! Treating Obama like a third class human! He is not worthy of standing at the Brandenburg Gate!!! That will not go over well, and will have long-time implications. With such a rude tongue they'll be digging their own grave, I hope!!!

Obama should skip Germany on his tour. He can hold his speech in Poland!! That would teach them a lesson.
I am hugely disappointed, and would be very ashamed of my country, if I was still living there. They have forgotten what they and Berlin looked like in 1945!

I'm a bit late in the game to respond to this, but I wouldn't really considder it a big deal.... for one thing, Obama isn't the US president yet.

Secondly, they're right, he didn't do anything, and the only reason why he wants to have a speech there is for presidential brownie points to make himself more "Worldly."

Third... Don't forget, Harper snubbed McCain's visit to Canada and his reasons were that he's not the president of the US yet.... which to me is a smart move to not get involved in the US election process and make it seem there is a favored candidate.

and that's the thing.... none of them are the president yet, so why should they be treated like one? Why should they get special privilages just to suit their own campaigns?
 
Last edited:

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
"US 5.5% unemployed July '08'

Millions more out of work but are not statistically unemployed because they are not collecting unemployment insurance.

Don't forget that in the US, when your unemployment runs out, you're no longer registered, therefore the % of people actually unemployed in the US is much higher then 5.5%.

Then again, I guess that's the same thing that you just said :p
 

scratch

Senate Member
May 20, 2008
5,658
22
38
I'm a bit late in the game to respond to this, but I wouldn't really considder it a big deal.... for one thing, Obama isn't the US president yet.

Secondly, they're right, he didn't do anything, and the only reason why he wants to have a speech there is for presidential brownie points to make himself more "Worldly."

Third... Don't forget, Harper snubbed McCain's visit to Canada and his reasons were that he's not the president of the US yet.... which to me is a smart move to not get involved in the US election process and make it seem there is a favored candidate.

and that's the thing.... none of them are the president yet, so why should they be treated like one? Why should they get special privilages just to suit their own campaigns?

Right on the money Prax.
 

dancing-loon

House Member
Oct 8, 2007
2,739
36
48
I'm a bit late in the game to respond to this, but I wouldn't really consider it a big deal.... for one thing, Obama isn't the US president yet.
No, he isn't, and might never be, but there is a 50% chance he will be. And in that case, how would they later stand there, having openly embarrassed him? He would remember that, but might have a big enough heart to overlook their pettiness. I'm aware I'm biased, because if they had said that to McCain, I wouldn't have cared.
Secondly, they're right, he didn't do anything, and the only reason why he wants to have a speech there is for presidential brownie points to make himself more "Worldly."
That's true, he didn't help with the reunification, because 20 years ago he was still in high-school!!!. I'd like to know who did help?

Praxi, that's an assumption that he wants to gain presidential Brownie points and look "worldly". Germany is pretty small, and Berlin is the center and Capital City... it is a natural to choose it. He could have chosen Hamburg or Nuernberg instead. But then, they might have felt insulted for giving those cities preference over Berlin. His committee did the right thing by inquiring which city would be suitable for the Germans. They could have responded by saying, 'we are honored to have you come and suggest ...any city..., even Buxtehude as a good place to give your speech'. It's the words that were said I find rude and deeply insulting. But that's me. I see nothing wrong with being kind, considerate, polite, and helpful.
Third... Don't forget, Harper snubbed McCain's visit to Canada and his reasons were that he's not the president of the US yet.... which to me is a smart move to not get involved in the US election process and make it seem there is a favored candidate.
Oh, I didn't know that! A Brownie point for Harper!

and that's the thing.... none of them are the president yet, so why should they be treated like one? Why should they get special privileges just to suit their own campaigns?
Praxi, I admire you for your ability to cut through all the mustard and come up with the most logical explanation.
O.k., I'll smoothen my feathers and let things be. Obama has to get used to being snubbed and booed and ignored etc. it's part of the game he got himself into.
 

scratch

Senate Member
May 20, 2008
5,658
22
38
No, he isn't, and might never be, but there is a 50% chance he will be. And in that case, how would they later stand there, having openly embarrassed him? He would remember that, but might have a big enough heart to overlook their pettiness. I'm aware I'm biased, because if they had said that to McCain, I wouldn't have cared.That's true, he didn't help with the reunification, because 20 years ago he was still in high-school!!!. I'd like to know who did help?

Praxi, that's an assumption that he wants to gain presidential Brownie points and look "worldly". Germany is pretty small, and Berlin is the center and Capital City... it is a natural to choose it. He could have chosen Hamburg or Nuernberg instead. But then, they might have felt insulted for giving those cities preference over Berlin. His committee did the right thing by inquiring which city would be suitable for the Germans. They could have responded by saying, 'we are honored to have you come and suggest ...any city..., even Buxtehude as a good place to give your speech'. It's the words that were said I find rude and deeply insulting. But that's me. I see nothing wrong with being kind, considerate, polite, and helpful.Oh, I didn't know that! A Brownie point for Harper!

Praxi, I admire you for your ability to cut through all the mustard and come up with the most logical explanation.
O.k., I'll smoothen my feathers and let things be. Obama has to get used to being snubbed and booed and ignored etc. it's part of the game he got himself into.

Bingo, loon!
 

dancing-loon

House Member
Oct 8, 2007
2,739
36
48
Thanks, data, for your answers. I saw you this morning, but I had to quit the computer and go with my friend strawberry picking. This was probably the very last time for this year. The berries are soooo good!!

Instead of copying your whole long post, I'll pick out separate relevant points.

When I said we were finished in 1945 I meant us, the German people. We had nowhere to run to, nowhere to hide... we were at the mercy of our enemies.
Hitler's greatest hope to get the atom bomb ready in time was smashed. Wernher von Braun and his team of scientists fled from Peenemuende to Austria and surrendered there to the Americans. What a humiliation! We were done, data! http://www.efour4ever.com/44thdivision/vonbrauncapture.html

I don't think anybody in his right mind believes the atom bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were humanitarian acts!! That's pure American BS!! It was done to test them out, to see how they work.

So, do you think you have good democratic politicians now in Germany? I am still disappointed how they handled the Murat Kurnaz case. But then, most Germans are anti-turk, anti-muslim.

Quoting dancing-loon: Well, don't they just about have that? The Senate is pretty much controlled by the Democrats. They still would have to have elections.(end quote)

Data:
Election about what? It should be politics, concepts for society and not just PR abilities.
I meant, although the two parties are more or less the same, or under the same lobbyists' influence, they still have to go through the process of an election campaign, so it looks like a democracy, but in reality it isn't.
I think they do talk about their political intentions.... don't know about concepts for society at large. They have to reveal themselves to the public, how else are the voters going to decide.

Transparency is often too low, also in democratic organized states.
Typical for that was a stance of a Bruxelles bureaucrat, to take out transparency from EU contract text in order to get the Irish votes. This kind of modern politics is rather poison for democracy.
Interesting tidbit from Europe, and a good example of manipulation to achieve a certain result. It's being done all over the world.

No, I haven't tried nailing pudding to the wall!:lol::lol: Data, you are getting funny!;-)

Alright, I won't comment on AIPAC!