Why The Towers Fell

[quandary121]

Well, by now, I wouldn't put any kind of remark as being beyond you. My apologies.

Any friend of yours ... is a friend of yours

 

[L Gilbert]

redicuals? Sorry, I can't find that in a dictionary. Name calling? Please tell me if you really are old enough to be posting in CC.

 

[quandary121]

redicuals? Sorry, I can't find that in a dictionary. Name calling? Please tell me if you really are old enough to be posting in CC.

look L Gilbert have you got a point about the WTC or have you got some attitude problem
whats the problem wickipedia not have the word in it so your unable to fathom out what it means
redicuals try the meaning( fool hardy attempts)

 

[CDNBear]

With all due respect, CB

I am dead serious and I will add this "Keep your friends close, but keep your enemies closer!"

At least 300 people had the same opinion as we did on that day and for weeks after.

Want names? Want the towns?

I lost a niece in Tower Two because she had been sucked in by money which is the only belief that "they" have.

But since she had given up her Canadian Citizenship, she was in the wrong place at the wrong time. Her fault not mine.

When she gave up her C.C. she became a traitor to me.

So it's true, I do not lie.

And I feel just fine in my shoes and hope the war continues so that more of them die.

CB, open your eyes and realize how you are being had!

End of discussion.

Seek help. That's not an attack on you, that's my honest opinion, for someone that thinks nothing of almost 3000 dead. I don't put a nationality to the murdered.

you kunt did you read the video log no here it is for you dumb fuk

Pentagon 9-11 Surveilence Camera Video of Impact. Does not seem to indicate a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon. Doesn't show much of anything. Why won't they show us a 757 hitting the Pentagon? They have plenty of Surveillance Cameras surrounding the Pentagon. Why is this the only one made public? You decide.
no 757 it was b/s like your reasoning

911 pentagon video explanation - 3 of 3
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=wlygvqFLio8

It doesn't matter what some halfwit attached to it, I can clearly see the nose cone of a plane hit the ground and slide into the Pentagon. Only a moron would think that was a missile.

First of all, CDN Bear and I live in Canada, not the United States.

Secondly, CDN Bear is a Mohawk. Look it up. He doesn't need you to lecture him on injustice.

Thirdly........the video shows nothing of what was going on, who knows? Why are the police moving these people? The girl "shot in the back of the head" is laughable...........I stopped watching at that point

Fourthly, you live in a nation that was the home of George Orwell, yet London has tens of thousands of surveillance cameras, you've lost the right to keep and bear arms, as well as the right to free speech, you have some nasty anti-terror legislation, and you are America's biggest ally in Iraq. Look in the mirror.

Try, please, I beg you, to post something that has some faint connection with reality.

ps: colpy if you hadn't noticed the rest of the world don't give a ****, whether you think you ain't American, the rest of the world still thinks that the Scott's, the welsh, and the Irish, are Brits, so don't come the were Canadian b/s to me m8, your American if you like it or not, ask any Iranian, Indian, iraqien, about there views on Canada, they still think you are American ,even if you and i know you ain't, still ****ing nice country you live in too your police are a ****ty as theirs, and just as brutal

Funny, I was lectured and had a huge argument with Daz Hockey about the very fact that I believe that Scotts, Irish and Welsh are not British.

Go figure.

 

[quandary121]

Seek help. That's not an attack on you, that's my honest opinion, for someone that thinks nothing of almost 3000 dead. I don't put a nationality to the murdered.
It doesn't matter what some halfwit attached to it, I can clearly see the nose cone of a plane hit the ground and slide into the Pentagon. Only a moron would think that was a missile.



Funny, I was lectured and had a huge argument with Daz Hockey about the very fact that I believe that Scotts, Irish and Welsh are not British.

Go figure.

I can clearly see the nose cone of a plane hit the ground and slide into the Pentagon. Only a moron would think that was a missile.

B/S bear you need glasses pal

Funny, I was lectured and had a huge argument with Daz Hockey about the very fact that I believe that Scotts, Irish and Welsh are not British.

you are now the rest of the world are you my god how utterly fastidious of you

1.excessively particular, critical, or demanding; hard to please: a fastidious eater. 2.requiring or characterized by excessive care or delicacy; painstaking

1. <LI minmax_bound="true">Possessing or displaying careful, meticulous attention to detail.
2. Difficult to please; exacting.

fastidious just in case you have to look up this

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20030804/scheer20030729

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20030804/scheer20030729
The fact is, Riyadh, unlike Baghdad, has long been a key hotbed of extremist Muslim organizing. By shielding and nurturing our relationship with the Saudi sheiks, Bush & Son have provided cover for those who support terror.
After all, is it really likely that career-conscious FBI and CIA officers would be willing to criticize possible Al Qaeda-House of Saud links when the President's father is out hustling business ties with the same family?
Even after September 11, 2001, the Bush Administration immediately protected Saudis in the United States, including allowing members of the large Bin Laden family who were in this country to be spirited home on their government's aircraft before they could be questioned. This at a time when many immigrants from all over the world were being detained arbitrarily.
Bush has used September 11 as an excuse to turn this country upside down, making a hash of civil liberties and bankrupting our federal government with unprecedented deficit spending on war and its materiel. Before we do any more irrevocable damage in the name of an open-ended "war against evil," we have a right and a responsibility to confront the uncensored truth of what happened that black day--no matter what powerful people are brought to account.

read it

http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm

Image : Space Imaging

Image : U.S. Department of Defense

The first satellite image shows the section of the building that was hit by the Boeing. In the image below, the second ring of the building is also visible. It is clear that the aircraft only hit the first ring. The four interior rings remain intact. They were only fire-damaged after the initial explosion.
Can you explain how a Boeing 757-200, weighing nearly 100 tons and travelling at a minimum speed of 250 miles an hour* only damaged the outside of the Pentagon?
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]*250 mph when landing, 600 mph in flight.[/FONT]

Image : U.S. Marine Corps, Cpl. Jason Ingersoll

Image : U.S. Army

The two photographs in question 2 show the building just after the attack. We may observe that the aircraft only hit the ground floor. The four upper floors collapsed towards 10.10 am. The building is 26 yards high.

Can you explain how a Boeing 14.9 yards high, 51.7 yards long, with a wingspan of 41.6 yards and a cockpit 3.8 yards high, could crash into just the ground floor of this building?

Image : U.S. Army
The photograph above shows the lawn in front of the damaged building.

You'll remember that the aircraft only hit the ground floor of the Pentagon's first ring. Can you find debris of a Boeing 757-200 in this photograph?

The photograph in question 4 shows a truck pouring sand over the lawn of the Pentagon. Behind it a bulldozer is seen spreading gravel over the turf.

Can you explain why the Defence Secretary deemed it necessary to sand over the lawn, which was otherwise undamaged after the attack?

Image : Space Imaging

Image : U.S. Department of Defense, Sgt. Rudisill
The photographs in Question 5 show representations of a Boeing 757-200 superimposed on the section of the building that was hit.

Can you explain what happened to the wings of the aircraft and why they caused no damage?


When asked by a journalist: "Is there anything left of the aircraft at all?"
"First of all, the question about the aircraft, there are some small pieces of aircraft visible from the interior during this fire-fighting operation I'm talking about, but not large sections. In other words, there's no fuselage sections and that sort of thing." " You know, I'd rather not comment on that. We have a lot of eyewitnesses that can give you better information about what actually happened with the aircraft as it approached. So we don't know. I don't know."
When asked by a journalist: "Where is the jet fuel?"
"We have what we believe is a puddle right there that the -- what we believe is to be the nose of the aircraft. So -"

The quotations in Question 6 correspond to statements made by Arlington County Fire Chief, Ed Plaugher, at a press conference held by Assistant Defence Secretary, Victoria Clarke, on 12 September 2001, at the Pentagon.
Can you explain why the County Fire Chief could not tell reporters where the aircraft was?

Images : U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Jason Ingersoll 1 et 2

The two photographs in question 7 were taken just after the attack. They show the precise spot on the outer ring where the Boeing struck.

Can you find the aircraft's point of impact?
(To view the photos in detail, download these enlargements: 1 and 2)


Did you find the Boeing? Can you still defend the official version of events?
> Well done! Remember to get in touch with master of illusion, David Copperfield. He'll be glad to hear from you!
You found the official version lacking in something (like a Boeing, for example):
> If you begin to question whether a Boeing really did crash on the Pentagon then, no doubt, you'll be wondering what happened to the aircraft that disappeared. You will probably ask yourself why the US government even told you this story in the first place and you'll start asking yourself lots of other questions besides. Don't worry! This is perfectly normal!

Source: www.reseauvoltaire.net - The photographs are official images and available on US army sites - See also "L'affaire du Pentagone" - Translation: Mr Sly - NB: Appearing on bookshelves end of March, the investigation by the Chair of the Réseau Voltaire into the September 11 attacks, examining the Bin Laden networks and American secret service involvement.​

 

[CDNBear]

B/S bear you need glasses pal

Really? Please, do tell us all what that large white object with the rounded nose was?

you are now the rest of the world are you my god how utterly fastidious of you

You didn't hurt yourself trying to dig up that word did ya? By the looks of that unintelligible string of nonsense, my guess is, you broke something up stairs.

 

[quandary121]

Really? Please, do tell us all what that large white object with the rounded nose was?
You didn't hurt yourself trying to dig up that word did ya? By the looks of that unintelligible string of nonsense, my guess is, you broke something up stairs.

that large white object with the rounded nose was?

It definately was not a Boeing 757-200, weighing nearly 100 tons and travelling at a minimum speed of 250 miles an hour now was it if you want me to track down a picture of a spy plane or something akin to the real object i could

Stock Photo - airplanes, aeronautics, aircraft, air-reconnaissance, air force, aerial

You didn't hurt yourself trying to dig up that word did ya? By the looks of that unintelligible string of nonsense,

no pal i did not did you need your kid sister to read it to you lol

 

[CDNBear]

It definately was not a Boeing 757-200, weighing nearly 100 tons and travelling at a minimum speed of 250 miles an hour now was it if you want me to track down a picture of a spy plane or something akin to the real object i could

Stock Photo - airplanes, aeronautics, aircraft, air-reconnaissance, air force, aerial

Do you actually think that is what hit the Pentagon? do you have any idea of the size difference between what is clearly seen in the video and that? Is your visual acuity messed up too?

no pal i did not did you need your kid sister to read it to you lol

Wow, how original...

Next!!!

 

[quandary121]

Do you actually think that is what hit the Pentagon? do you have any idea of the size difference between what is clearly seen in the video and that? Is your visual acuity messed up too?

Wow, how original...

Next!!!

Do you actually think that is what hit the Pentagon? do you have any idea of the size difference between what is clearly seen in the video and that? Is your visual acuity messed up too?

Wow, how original...

Next!!![/quote]

you realy do need glasses ,what is clearly seen is not clearly seen, otherwise we would all know the thuth would we not, your powers of obsivation are as poor as your logic here i think, this is a pretty dam close type of craft tht hit the pentagon right down to the size of what you can just make out on your piss poor video. prove that this did not hit it then

 

[quandary121]

did you look closely at this picture wheres your Boeing 757-200, weighing nearly 100 tons
oh i get it its hiding under the water spout

 

[CDNBear]

Dprove that this did not hit it then

I'm not the one making the claim, you are, so prove it...

I can tell by the video, that what hit the Pentagon is ten if not twenty times the size of that Global hawk.

Any moron with the visual acuity of a preschooler can see that the size of the object in realation to the surrounding structures, is a plane, not a remote vehicle.

 

[quandary121]

I'm not the one making the claim, you are, so prove it...

I can tell by the video, that what hit the Pentagon is ten if not twenty times the size of that Global hawk.

Any moron with the visual acuity of a preschooler can see that the size of the object in realation to the surrounding structures, is a plane, not a remote vehicle.

try the picture above this useless comment wheres the Boeing 757-200, weighing nearly 100 tons

 

[quandary121]

no wings no tail fin no bodys no real wreckage wheres the god dam plane bear where the fuk is it m8 all i see is a piss poor little hole

 

[CDNBear]

try the picture above this useless comment wheres the Boeing 757-200, weighing nearly 100 tons

Which one of your 'useless comments' would you be talking about...you've posted hundreds.

no wings no tail fin no bodys no real wreckage wheres the god dam plane bear where the fuk is it m8 all i see is a piss poor little hole

First off, it would nice if that was actually a pic of the impact site. Secondly **** falls apart when it slams into high density concrete eh...Ya ya I know, no reality in your world, means no clue as to whether you can actually fathom what I'm saying...:roll:

 

[CDNBear]

What happens when a plane hits reinforced concrete?

Oh my God...where did it go???

 

[quandary121]

What happens when a plane hits reinforced concrete?

What happens when a plane hits reinforced concrete?

ive seen this idiot, this is a solid wall, is it not.? the pentagon is not solid is it..?(What happens when a plane hits reinforced concrete?)It has and this may be a little dificult for you to understand" WINDOWS" now you going to tell me that a window pulvarised a plane.? like i said in this picture that you keep dismissing

no bodys no marks where the tail or wings would of hit stick with this picture and lets discuss this picture not your pathetic attems at dissproving ,becides ive seen the video of that series of photo graphs as a answer to the pentagon attack for one its not a Boeing 757-200, weighing nearly 100 tons and its not travelling at a minimum speed of 250 is it
do you see any marks on the grass in my picture ..?

 

[quandary121]

also this one no marks on the ground...? or bodys

 

[CDNBear]

ive seen this idiot, this is a solid wall, is it not.?

Yep

the pentagon is not solid is it..?

Pretty much, it's a military facility, not that I'ld expect you to understand that at all.

(What happens when a plane hits reinforced concrete?)It has and this may be a little dificult for you to understand" WINDOWS" now you going to tell me that a window pulvarised a plane.?

The whole building isn't made of glass. Statistically, it's more reinforced concrete then glass...again, something I have no hopes of you graspping.

no bodys no marks where the tail or wings would of hit stick with this picture and lets discuss this picture not your pathetic attems at dissproving ,becides ive seen the video of that series of photo graphs as a answer to the pentagon attack for one its not a Boeing 757-200, weighing nearly 100 tons and its not travelling at a minimum speed of 250 is it
do you see any marks on the grass in my picture ..?

No, it's a much smaller aircraft, with less mass, thus proving the principal theory of a plane hitting virtually the same material and disintegrating.

Now, if your picture was of the grass further from the wall, you would note the scar on the lawn that was created from the plane bouncing off it that you can clear see is quite a distance away, in the video...

Again, nothing here will filter through that thick head of yours...carry on.

 

[quandary121]

The photograph in question 4 shows a truck pouring sand over the lawn of the Pentagon. Behind it a bulldozer is seen spreading gravel over the turf.

Can you explain why the Defence Secretary deemed it necessary to sand over the lawn, which was otherwise undamaged after the attack?

did you look at this and read what it said no oh how convenient

 

[CDNBear]

The photograph in question 4 shows a truck pouring sand over the lawn of the Pentagon. Behind it a bulldozer is seen spreading gravel over the turf.

Can you explain why the Defence Secretary deemed it necessary to sand over the lawn, which was otherwise undamaged after the attack?

What's the first thing a work crew does when major construction or reconstruction is about to take place?

I won't wait for an answer...I doubt you know anyways...

They build a road for the multitude of heavy equipment that will undoubtedly be needed. A lawn is not safe for cranes, work trucks and other assorted heavy equipment.

How convenient...

btw...the lawn was damaged, just not where you keep pulling pic's from. LMAO!!!

did you look at this and read what it said no oh how convenient

Moron...unlike you, I read everything posted. Why do you think I'm so much smarter then you?

C;mon now, use what little grey matter you have to formulate those asinine questions better.