Well that's a surprise. I thought the point I made was that your argument contains a logical fallacy.The point you made Dexter is why the Son of God came for.
Well that's a surprise. I thought the point I made was that your argument contains a logical fallacy.The point you made Dexter is why the Son of God came for.
Yes, I do believe in the Big Bang theory, but belief is really the wrong concept to apply here. The evidence in support of it is massive and convincing, it'd be unreasonable to withhold assent, so I'd say I accept it as by far the most likely explanation available of how it all got started. But it might be wrong. Whether we're the first or not, nobody knows, and probably nobody ever will, there's a lot of space to explore. That's a question for which agnosticism is the most reasonable position. An eternity of big bangs seems unlikely. It doesn't appear that the universe as we know it is heading for a big crunch in the distant future, there doesn't seem to be quite enough mass in it to halt the expansion and bring it all back together again, but I think the jury's still out on that one. Niflmir probably has more current information than I do on that. Human life will almost certainly be seen only once in this universe, but that doesn't make it an anomaly except in the broadest possible sense that every life form is an anomaly. There are so many contingent events in the history of evolution that if we could rewind the story and start it over again, the result is overwhelmingly likely to be very different.do you believe in the big bang theory?
If so...are we the first after an eternity of big bangs...
Is this life an anomoly only to be seen once?
Well that's a surprise. I thought the point I made was that your argument contains a logical fallacy.
It is like opening a box of puzzle pieces, and throwing them all on the table top and then trying to put them all together to make one big picture of them all.Can't see how that clarifies anything. I haven't a clue what you're talking about.
Wow. That post is a model of straightforward coherence compared to your previous one. Hard to believe the same person wrote them both. My view is that all religions are fundamentally wrong at the core, which I summarize as the belief that there's at least one supernatural entity that has some interest in us. The metaphorical puzzle you speak of is entirely an invention of human imagination and has no more reality than any other fictional world. The nonbelievers have it right, the best evidence is that there are no supernatural entities of any sort, never mind one that has some interest in us. You might as well pray to The Force of Star Wars, or Zeus or Thor or Odin or any of the thousands of other such human creations. I presume you're atheist with respect to those, same as I am, and would agree that they're human inventions. I've just taken one more step.It is like opening a box of puzzle pieces...
Wow. That post is a model of straightforward coherence compared to your previous one. Hard to believe the same person wrote them both. My view is that all religions are fundamentally wrong at the core, which I summarize as the belief that there's at least one supernatural entity that has some interest in us. The metaphorical puzzle you speak of is entirely an invention of human imagination and has no more reality than any other fictional world. The nonbelievers have it right, the best evidence is that there are no supernatural entities of any sort, never mind one that has some interest in us. You might as well pray to The Force of Star Wars, or Zeus or Thor or Odin or any of the thousands of other such human creations. I presume you're atheist with respect to those, same as I am, and would agree that they're human inventions. I've just taken one more step.
False dichotomy, those aren't the only options. Maybe god is right and the Qu'ran is wrong. Maybe they're both wrong. Maybe there is no god. Maybe there is one but he isn't much interested in us. Maybe there are multiple gods, as most human civilizations have believed. Maybe everybody's wrong and the truth is something nobody's figured out yet. Maybe we're the only intelligent life forms in the cosmos; somebody has to be first. Maybe none of it matters because there is no absolute truth in any meaningful ontological sense. Religious dogmatism is blinding.
No.Don't you see the solar system created with wisdom to bear life?
There's no relationship between distance from the sun and axial inclination.For example: the different axis inclinations of the planets according to their different distances from the sun; to counteract for the expected coldness of some faraway planets.
A first; you finally got something right.The planets have day and night because of their spinning around themselves, and seasons because of their orbitting the sun and because of their axis inclinations, etc.
No it doesn't, it indicates only the existence of water there.The existence of water has been proved in some of the planets; this indicates the existence of life there.
The only fanatic here is you.I think the atheist, and here is an excellent example is fanatic about his atheism.
because the same God will mislead many as will He guide many on Earth and on the planets.>>>eanassir
Don't you see the solar system created with wisdom to bear life? For example: the different axis inclinations of the planets according to their different distances from the sun; to counteract for the expected coldness of some faraway planets.
The planets have day and night because of their spinning around themselves, and seasons because of their orbitting the sun and because of their axis inclinations, etc.
The existence of water has been proved in some of the planets; this indicates the existence of life there.
I think the atheist, and here is an excellent example is fanatic about his atheism, just like the polytheist. So that he insists on his atheism; but it will be the same: there will be found atheists and polythiests there; because the same God will mislead many as will He guide many on Earth and on the planets.
eanassir.
eanassir.
First of all, there is little chance of intelligent life on any planet other than Earth in our solar system and you know that.
Secondly, don't use the Quran as an astronomical guide. The writers didn't know what they were talking about and you know that too.
Third, with your command of the English language, there is only a tiny chance you are as ignorant as you show yourself. You are putting us on. Take your silly show somewhere else. Please
There is not intelligent life on mars . You can say what you want but we've been studying the planet for years now not to mention there are currently two robots on mars roaming two opposite sides of the planet and they haven't even found bacteria let alone an intelligent life form . Secondly don't you think that if intelligent life existed on mars there's be ruins ? artifacts ? buildings ? Wait was there a flood on mars too ?First:I say there is intelligent life on Mars and some other planets with the exception of Mercury and Venus.
Second: God revealed the Quran, which is known by heart, like you know a peom by heart, so that if anyone read the Quran with some wrong word by mistake, there will be many who will immediately correct for him his mistake; the Quran is known by heart by many non-Arab who even do not know its meaning. The Quran is concize book; this is in comparison to the Holy Bible which is extensive, and only its translations are available, but not the original one.
Thirdly: I know there are some who make language mistakes more than I do. Then I should not compel anyone to believe, and even I cannot do that; I shall only reply to those who object or ask.
eanassir.
There is not intelligent life on mars ...
My friend, the beginning of creation was a mis-led.
Example: Did your dad ever tell you what a hellish place this was prior to your being born?
....Peace>>>AJ
The purpose is to live in this World as an examination and trial, and that the soul will grow inside the body until adulthood and maturity, and that man will have experience and his wisdom will grow, and will choose his way:
- In case he is a wrong-doer who transgress on people, then God will mislead him, and will be an idolater, athiest or associater and Satan will have control over him leading him to immerse in sins, particularly the association with God contrary to the First Commandment; so he will go to Hell on the Judgment Day.
- And in case he works the righteous work, helps the poor and the weak,and honors the parents, then God will guide him to the monotheism: to serve God alone and exclusively without associating anyone or anything with Him, and so He will admit him to Paradise where he will prosper forever, with the goodpleasure of God, and there he will have all joys: drinking, eating, having sexual contact with his wives, and talking with his righteous friends: no disease, insects, tiredness, depression or anxiety, and they will praise their Lord Who created them in order to bestow on them His grace and mercy; but wrong-doers chose the opposite. >>>eanassir
Therefore, a dark area may in fact be a large city or a lake or a forest …etc.
Moreover, the rover is a very small unit, and moves slowly; and !!by chance!! its region where it rovers is a desolate desert.