Fake CNN video on 9-11

wallyj

just special
May 7, 2006
1,230
21
38
not in Kansas anymore
Look at the smoke. Those were taken at slightly different times.

Case closed.

Now let's get on to the Minneapolis Bridge conspiracy.
Global warming caused it. Of course,bush is behind global warming also. BTW,I bet if that beagle was launched at a building bush would be blamed also. Underdog to the rescue.
 

wallyj

just special
May 7, 2006
1,230
21
38
not in Kansas anymore
Many peoples were fired, many people had to resign from their post, for talking too much.


9-11 happened, 3 building fell at almost free fall speed, the only way to know the real cause of the collapse is to do an investigation on the debris, which were sold immidiately to china, which is a violation of international law and american law, however you guys don't even care.

it took 432 days to form a bi-partisan comission on 9-11, never happened in american history

president bush and cheeney had to appear together (like a real couple) in front of the bi-partisan comission, and not under oath, and more importantly no one in the world has the right to know what was said inside.

the anthrax attacked revealed it was an inside job, 2 democrates were the target of the anthrax, both of them were against patriot act, and strong opponent to the bush administration...


5 of the highjaker are still alive, nothing has been change in the 9-11 report by the greath bi-partisan comission.

and you guys are still goin ....... what is wrong?



ok guys let's go......


Put your ass in the air, and wait for your lord governement to tell you what to do.
I said that no one has ever confessed to taking part in this . You counter with many people were fired for talking too much and then switch to your other talking points. Why? I want to know who these people are and what they said? Supply the names,what did they say,where are they now? WTF does anthrax have to do with a cover-up? Are you also saying the bi-partisan commision is in on the cover-up also? Maybe the dems are being quiet to protect Bush and Cheney? BTW the scrap was not immediately sold to China. Look at the pictures taken 8 months later.Of course you dismiss everything that does not fit your theory. When did it become illegal to sell scrap metal? And one last thing,how fast are buildings supposed to fall? Bring facts not hate-inspired innuendo.
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
I said that no one has ever confessed to taking part in this . You counter with many people were fired for talking too much and then switch to your other talking points. Why? I want to know who these people are and what they said? Supply the names,what did they say,where are they now? WTF does anthrax have to do with a cover-up? Are you also saying the bi-partisan commision is in on the cover-up also? Maybe the dems are being quiet to protect Bush and Cheney? BTW the scrap was not immediately sold to China. Look at the pictures taken 8 months later.Of course you dismiss everything that does not fit your theory. When did it become illegal to sell scrap metal? And one last thing,how fast are buildings supposed to fall? Bring facts not hate-inspired innuendo.


Many peoples has been fired, or forced to resign(steven E jones is a good exemple)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_E._Jones

Jones and Brigham Young University finalized a retirement package on October 20, 2006, six weeks after the school had placed him on paid leave to review his statements about the World Trade Center. "I am electing to retire so that I can spend more time speaking and conducting research of my own choosing," Jones said in a statement released by the university. Jones' retirement was effective January 1, 2007.[26]



Yes the anthrax was an inside job, when it happen, we could hear alqueada all the time in the news, and then one day, some fbi investigator realized it was an inside job, then we never heard about it anymore, that is a sad fact.


Yes debris was sold immediatly to china, it took5-8 month to get all debris out of ground zero

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center_site
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Look at the smoke. Those were taken at slightly different times.

Case closed.

Now let's get on to the Minneapolis Bridge conspiracy.

Gee... I wonder why he won't comment on this. The proof is in the pictures he provided! The smoke is different plus the position of the plane has changed... just look at the right side of the photos.

Notice the extra open sky in one compared to the other? :lol::lol::lol::lol:
 

wallyj

just special
May 7, 2006
1,230
21
38
not in Kansas anymore
OK,logic7,I commented that no one involved in this crime or cover-up has cracked yet. You come up with Jones. He was not involved with either. He chose to retire after being put on paid leave. I want a name of someone involved in either the crime or the cover-up who has spoken out. Just one name.ONE. Can you do it? Don't give me names of people who were fired because they became obsessed with a conspiracy. I want just one name of someone involved. Can you not see that this whole conspiracy theory is built on a very shaky foundation? Every "fact" that is used is actually a "maybe" or a "possibility" or a "could've". There is no solid facts. With so many people involved,you must be able to come up with ONE name. I am waiting,or just admit that you have been duped by the clever Jones team.
 

wallyj

just special
May 7, 2006
1,230
21
38
not in Kansas anymore
I'm still waiting,Mr logic. Or anyone of you conspiracists? One name out of the probable thousands who must have been involved in the crime and/or cover-up.Time to put up or shut up, boys.
 

JBeee

Time Out
Jun 1, 2007
1,826
52
48
 

wallyj

just special
May 7, 2006
1,230
21
38
not in Kansas anymore
What is your point? I agree that we should always question the gov't,but I don't think we should disbelieve everything because of blind hatred.Total acceptance is as bad as total denial. So come on guys,it has been almost 6 years,someone must have a name of someone involved in the crime/cover-up? Time to put up or shut up. I see logic7 has decided to shut up.(no way,that is just wishful thinking).C'mon jbee,you can fill in for him,give me a name . And please not an infantile answer like Bush or Cheney.
 

wallyj

just special
May 7, 2006
1,230
21
38
not in Kansas anymore
Questioning authority does not mean believing everything the detractors of government say.
My point exactly. According to surveys there is approx.50 to 100 million americans and 5 to 10 million canadians ,that think 911 was an inside job. One would think that with this many truthers out there,that at least one of them would know one of the thousands who were involved in the crime/cover-up of the murder of thousands of thier fellow countrymen. So once again,wankers,give me a name. JUST ONE NAME.or admit that you are wrong and it was islamic terrorists without gov't compliance.
 
Last edited:

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
212
63
In the bush near Sudbury
My point exactly. According to surveys there is approx.50 to 100 million americans and 5 to 10 million canadians ,that think 911 was an inside job. One would think that with this many truthers out there,that at least one of them would know one of the thousands who were involved in the crime/cover-up of the murder of thousands of thier fellow countrymen. So once again,wankers,give me a name. JUST ONE NAME.or admit that you are wrong and it was islamic terrorists without gov't compliance.

I am one of those 5 to 10 million Canadians who think it was an inside job. No, I don't happen to have names, but I do have suspicions. One needs neither proof to trust nor evidence to distrust. I have seen deception in action. I saw Lee Harvey Oswald take the rap in a single bullet theory when evidence points to the contrary. I heard about gunboats - boats not even safe for open sea - firing on the USS Maddox in Tonkin Gulf. Thus, an open season could be declared in Vietnam.

I was on this planet when an activist for Negro Rights and an "uppity n****r" (God, how I hate that term) were assasinated in 1968 - and saw how fast a perp was collared, bagged and boxed in fast little packages. I have witnessed as Big Brother blindly gives support to the narcissistic new kid on the block in the Middle East.

From September 11, I question why tapes from every video surveilance camera around the Pentagon were seized. If a Boeing 757 hit that building, why wasn't there enough wreckage to recreate a Cessna? I heard news of an Air National Guard F-16 firing on a passenger jet in Pennsylvania. There again, the crater and lack of wreckage leaves me in doubt.

Though I am not qualified to determine an implosion, as a student of civil engineering technology, I know there is not heat enough generated by aviation fuel to melt or even soften steel columns to the point WTC would have collapsed. No doubt they were both struck by large aircraft - but who was really in command, at the controls, and behind it all? I don't know - but eventually there WILL be deathbed confessions.

Wanker? I don't think so, but you're entitled to your opinion. I prefer skeptic.

Wolf
 
Last edited:

wallyj

just special
May 7, 2006
1,230
21
38
not in Kansas anymore
Of course you are entitled to your opinions. Do not give me any of the theories as you just have. They have all been answered elsewhere. I want one of you 60 million to give me a name of someone involved. Don't sidetrack this with JFK or the civil rights movement or any other injustice by this gov't or previous. JUST ONE NAME of the thousands involved Can't do it,can you? I use the term wankers towards those on this forum and many other forums who feel morally and intellectually superior because they are in the "know" and refer to those who demand facts as "sheeple". If that describes you,then you sir,are a wanker.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
212
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Of course you are entitled to your opinions. Do not give me any of the theories as you just have. They have all been answered elsewhere. I want one of you 60 million to give me a name of someone involved. Don't sidetrack this with JFK or the civil rights movement or any other injustice by this gov't or previous. JUST ONE NAME of the thousands involved Can't do it,can you? I use the term wankers towards those on this forum and many other forums who feel morally and intellectually superior because they are in the "know" and refer to those who demand facts as "sheeple". If that describes you,then you sir,are a wanker.
I'd suggest you keep your mind open. This will long be a gray zone, so black-and-white, "fer-us-or-agin-us" logic will teach us nothing. Eventually, truth will be exposed.

Wolf
 

wallyj

just special
May 7, 2006
1,230
21
38
not in Kansas anymore
What a bunch of morons.The facts are there, but millions of people prefer to believe speculation. It is not a grey zone,rather it is people lacking grey matter who fear the truth.For my final post of the night ,humor me,no-one has come up with a name of one of the thousands involved in the crime/cover-up,so maybe one of you buffoons can tell me why. Was everyone given a super secret drug developed by the CIA to erase thier memory? Are thier loved ones being held on an island somewhere under threat of death if they speak out? Mass hypnosis? I know coming up with JUST ONE NAME is too tough,so let's come up with a reason why they are not telling the "truth" about 9/11. I'll start,everyone involved has had an anal probe that implanted a device designed by Mossad that renders them unable to speak ill of George Bush. Why not? Prove otherwise.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
212
63
In the bush near Sudbury
What a bunch of morons.The facts are there, but millions of people prefer to believe speculation.... quote]

And millions choose to have faith in a government with a history of manufacturing truths for the gullible. No ... it wasn't Dubya. He's only smart enough to be a patsy. If someone knows, their lives are at risk in speaking out. Night scarecrow....

Wolf
 

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
And millions choose to have faith in a government with a history of manufacturing truths for the gullible. No ... it wasn't Dubya. He's only smart enough to be a patsy. If someone knows, their lives are at risk in speaking out. Night scarecrow....

Wolf

Again, the conspiracists suspend belief of the government yet are willing to believe anything with no tangible proof as long as it confirms their pre-conceived worldview. It doesn't matter how outrageous or how bizarre or how lacking in context and perspective.

A proclivity to believe in conspiracy theories is not evidence of an analytical mind. Just the opposite, in fact.