Fake CNN video on 9-11

Just the Facts

House Member
Oct 15, 2004
4,162
43
48
SW Ontario
911 myths doesnt even mention who they are, means no credibility, and no they don't cover all the event, try harder.

From Colpy's link, right on the first page, in large font:

But does this make us an authority? No. If we’ve an overall message here, it’s check things for yourself. Don’t trust a site just because it’s telling you what you want to believe. Don’t believe us without evaluating our arguments and checking the references we provide, either (we’re as likely to make mistakes as anyone else). Look into the claims yourself, discover both sides of the argument, and make your own mind up. The truth deserves nothing less.
 

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=17437




I am sorry, this is not about spin, read the whole article, it will help.

It is an article about how the army learns how to spin. I know English isn't your first language, but that is what the article is about. Though, simply because its on WorldNetDaily does not mean its true.

The cnn video was fake, it is about 10 times you ask me the same questions, it is about time you get a grip my friend.

Wrong.

But let's say it is fake. So what? Are you saying that a plane didn't really fly into the WTC?
 

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
Because i did my own little reasearch , i don't let the governement or any other retarded institute to tell me what to think, and here is the proof again and again.


sylverstein pull


What pull means


Secondly when conspiracist came with this, sylverstein came with an explanation a year after, saying that pull meant the firefighters to get out of the building,but the big problem with this explanation, it is just impossible, according to fema report there was no firefighers in wtc 7 since 11h30 in the morning, this is called doing his homework my toro.

You get an F.
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
From Colpy's link, right on the first page, in large font:

But does this make us an authority? No. If we’ve an overall message here, it’s check things for yourself. Don’t trust a site just because it’s telling you what you want to believe. Don’t believe us without evaluating our arguments and checking the references we provide, either (we’re as likely to make mistakes as anyone else). Look into the claims yourself, discover both sides of the argument, and make your own mind up. The truth deserves nothing less.


Nice words, this is something everyone of you should do, but it still doesnt say who the hell they are, why is that? no credibility, and i proved it with "pull"
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
It is an article about how the army learns how to spin. I know English isn't your first language, but that is what the article is about. Though, simply because its on WorldNetDaily does not mean its true.


It is not just about spnining itis about those 2 reporter that has been fired to have reported that us governement used sarin gaz to kill suspected defector during the vietnam war




I did prove it, the building was too close to wtc, and it is impossible that the plane is lower than the other building that cnn shows, which we don't even see in the opposite side of wtc and others news network, now if you want to prove that i am wrong, go for it, but just don't say, WRONG, do it, New york is the most documented city in the world on the internet, so there is no reason not to do it.


I
But let's say it is fake. So what? Are you saying that a plane didn't really fly into the WTC?


Maybe , that is probably why we don't see any plane in here.




And more over, the news reporter doesnt even mention a plane hiting the wtc, she talks about explosions.
 

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
Maybe , that is probably why we don't see any plane in here.




And more over, the news reporter doesnt even mention a plane hiting the wtc, she talks about explosions.

:lol:

You have got to be kidding.

That's right. What everyone around the world saw live was a mere stunt, with all the different angles and all the different shots - ones you have used to support some bizarre claim - whereas this clip is an authentic shot of what actually happened with a woman who has it bang on.

:lol:

And the earth is flat, Logic.
 

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
Look!

Its a UFO at the WTC!



Osama is an alien!

:lol:
 

wallyj

just special
May 7, 2006
1,230
21
38
not in Kansas anymore
Almost 6 years later and no one in this massive cover-up and conspiracy has cracked yet. Hundreds of demolition experts,security staff,workers at the wtc,gov't agents,etc. Not one deathbed confession or one loose lip. This proves more than anything else that Bush runs a tight ship and is smarter than most everyone(except logic7,of course).
 

Cosmo

House Member
Jul 10, 2004
3,725
22
38
Victoria, BC
I saw both planes hit the towers several dozen feet over my head. Do you believe it now?

No, I wasn't watching it through a lens of any kind. :roll:

8O How awful for you, ITN.

I believe there were two planes, but the collapse of the buildings is suspect. In viewing various videos of it, it seems obvious to me that there were explosives involved. Buildings don't just naturally fall into their own footprints with the outside walls on the top. Buildings don't start to topple then disintegrate in mid air. Firemen don't talk about hearing bombs immediately after the event.

Someone asked why there would be a cover up. I wonder that too. I believe there was, indeed, some accomplished misdirection and I really wonder why. The government is just not that trustworthy, IMHO. I've always felt there was more to this story.

I understand why people want to believe the government is blameless. Hell, I want to believe it! Anything else is too terrifying to contemplate. I don't want to live next door to a leader that would be involved in something so horrifying. I don't think the government did this, but I do believe they knew something. You gotta confess that the US government doesn't have the greatest track record at full disclosure. :roll:
 
Last edited:

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Almost 6 years later and no one in this massive cover-up and conspiracy has cracked yet. Hundreds of demolition experts,security staff,workers at the wtc,gov't agents,etc. Not one deathbed confession or one loose lip. This proves more than anything else that Bush runs a tight ship and is smarter than most everyone(except logic7,of course).

Like the man says... this was an ingenius cover-up by a man that a lot of people are calling the dumbest guy ever... GW Bush. Thousands of demolition experts, CIA, FBI, military... not one has spoken out on their part in this and all believed that it was important to kill over 3000 people. Not just that but to crash another plane into the Pentagon and into a field in Shanksville Pa. Well actually the Shanksville plane was heading towards Bldg. 7... my bad.
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
:lol:

You have got to be kidding.

That's right. What everyone around the world saw live was a mere stunt, with all the different angles and all the different shots - ones you have used to support some bizarre claim - whereas this clip is an authentic shot of what actually happened with a woman who has it bang on.

:lol:

And the earth is flat, Logic.



WHat people around the world saw are video shot, none of those shot has been proven to be real, here is the proof.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfDg2rX9JgE&mode=related&search=




No kidding, this person on this video says that another explosion just happened, not a plane crashing into it, crazy isnt?

Just try to find the plane on the video, HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAVE FUN.

 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
Almost 6 years later and no one in this massive cover-up and conspiracy has cracked yet. Hundreds of demolition experts,security staff,workers at the wtc,gov't agents,etc. Not one deathbed confession or one loose lip. This proves more than anything else that Bush runs a tight ship and is smarter than most everyone(except logic7,of course).


Many peoples were fired, many people had to resign from their post, for talking too much.


9-11 happened, 3 building fell at almost free fall speed, the only way to know the real cause of the collapse is to do an investigation on the debris, which were sold immidiately to china, which is a violation of international law and american law, however you guys don't even care.

it took 432 days to form a bi-partisan comission on 9-11, never happened in american history

president bush and cheeney had to appear together (like a real couple) in front of the bi-partisan comission, and not under oath, and more importantly no one in the world has the right to know what was said inside.

the anthrax attacked revealed it was an inside job, 2 democrates were the target of the anthrax, both of them were against patriot act, and strong opponent to the bush administration...


5 of the highjaker are still alive, nothing has been change in the 9-11 report by the greath bi-partisan comission.

and you guys are still goin ....... what is wrong?



ok guys let's go......


Put your ass in the air, and wait for your lord governement to tell you what to do.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Hey Logic... i viewed both of your last YouTube videos and it is clear that your Logic is fogged.

Video 1. The angle was directly behind the buildings. The planes hit from the other side. If I am standing behind a door and a fist comes through it I am naturally not going to see the person winding up his fist to punch it.

Video 2. If the super imposing buildings lined up exactly you may have finally... FINALLY had a case. But ALAS NO! Both shots were at different angles as you can see FOUR outlines of the two buildings. If we only saw two outlines then it may be persuasive. To simplify this for you...

Both camera shots were shot at different distances and at different angles as the video clearly showed. Therefore the cameras are going to show something different. Like the people below shooting WTC 2 saw it come over their heads.

So go on searching YouTube.

HAAAAAAVE FUUUUUUUUN!
 

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
WHat people around the world saw are video shot, none of those shot has been proven to be real, here is the proof.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfDg2rX9JgE&mode=related&search=




No kidding, this person on this video says that another explosion just happened, not a plane crashing into it, crazy isnt?

Just try to find the plane on the video, HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAVE FUN.


:sign6:

I saw both planes hit the towers several dozen feet over my head. Do you believe it now?

No, I wasn't watching it through a lens of any kind. :roll:

:laughing8:

--->

 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
9-11 happened, 3 building fell at almost free fall speed,

Now we're getting somewhere. Previously, you've insisted that the buildings "fell faster than gravity" which you used as some sort of proof of deliberate demolition.

I'm glad to see that you've come around, and now you agree that they fell down.

Your meds must be working now.
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
Hey Logic... i viewed both of your last YouTube videos and it is clear that your Logic is fogged.

Video 1. The angle was directly behind the buildings. The planes hit from the other side. If I am standing behind a door and a fist comes through it I am naturally not going to see the person winding up his fist to punch it.

Video 2. If the super imposing buildings lined up exactly you may have finally... FINALLY had a case. But ALAS NO! Both shots were at different angles as you can see FOUR outlines of the two buildings. If we only saw two outlines then it may be persuasive. To simplify this for you...

Both camera shots were shot at different distances and at different angles as the video clearly showed. Therefore the cameras are going to show something different. Like the people below shooting WTC 2 saw it come over their heads.

So go on searching YouTube.
HAAAAAAVE FUUUUUUN!



Not at all, here is the proof again and again.