The trial of the Medicine Hat girl; who with her 23 year old boy friend, killed her parents; s underway. Does she have any remorse?
Last edited:
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/calgary/story/2007/06/04/medhat-day1.html
Trial starts for Medicine Hat girl accused of killing family
CBC News
A murder trial began Monday for a 13-year-old accused of killing her family in Medicine Hat, Alta., in 2006.
The girl has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first degree murder in the deaths of her parents and eight-year-old brother in April 2006.
The trial of her co-accused, 23-year-old Jeremy Steinke, will be held later.
The first week of the teen's trial has been set aside for a voir dire, legal proceedings that examine the admissibility of evidence.
Defence lawyer Tim Foster has applied to keep the public and the media out of the courtroom during this process. He has refused any interviews on the matter.
Fred Kozak, a media lawyer hired by the CBC to argue against that exclusion in court on Monday, said it was the first time that he has heard of an application to ban the public and the media from such proceedings.
![]()
"Our argument will be that the judicial system, including voir dires, have to be open and transparent and that publication bans have proven to be an effective mechanism that balance the fair trial rights of the accused with freedom of expression."
The teenage girl, who cannot be identified under terms of the Youth Criminal Justice Act, has been in custody at the Calgary Young Offender Centre for more than a year.
She is to be tried by a jury, which will not be chosen until next week.
MORE CALGARY HEADLINES »
Online messages talked about Medicine Hat killings, says witness A 12-year-old girl sent an online message to her boyfriend detailing a plan to kill her parents one month before her entire family was found stabbed to death in their Medicine Hat home, a jury heard Friday.
We live in a narcissistic age, and teenagers are the height of narcissism. She was only concerned with her wants, her needs and her sense pleasures. Other people's humanity did not enter the equation because she does not recognize other people as independent entities.
Pangloss
Something struck me today when I was out in the company event how selfish a lot of people are nowadays...
What you're saying Pangloss really confirmed that unfortunately...
.... or they could have been a normal non-abusive family whose 13 year old daugher fell in with the wrong crowd. We don't know many facts but that doesn't mean she is somehow a tragic figure and the victims were some sort of monsters.
And even if they were, what sin had her 8 year old brother done to warrent his execution at her hands? 8 years old.
So lets hold off a bit on the excuses and understanding as to why this cold blooded murderer killed 3 people until we have a few more facts shall we?
I agree, so don't you think jumping to the conclusion she's a cold blooded murderer without proper information is just as bad?
You don't know the facts, so make note that that does not mean her parents were monster's and she was a victim (which is 100% true) then jump to the conclusion that she was a monster and her parents were vicitms (with the same lack of proof)
There is MUCH we don't know, and many reasons. Why did she kill the 8 year old? Maybe she was a monster, maybe it was an accident in some heat of passion, maybe it was a mercy killing and she intended to kill herself too (perhaps they were both abused and she knew it).
This is not to say she might not just be a monster.
This is to say don't go jumping to conclusions and making broad generalised statements about age groups based on incomplete evidence on one instance.
Curio:
Maybe we'll get to know the facts. Trials are funny things.
Pangloss