Interesting thread.
I look at it this way: If, for some, cannabis offers something of value, as it clearly does, then why the prohibition? Is it a big brother issue, as in the Government and can dictate what is moral or ethical behaviour on a "fine" scale? (Face it - we are not talkling murder or child abuse here).
I think we need to divorce ourselves from the emotional elements of this argument and look at what inevitabley might actually work at reducing abuse of drugs and the corruption and crime keeping them 'illegal' actually encourages.
Here is a site which I hope is visited with an open mind. It does not advocate the use of drugs but looks at the problem in a very pragmatic way:
LEAP
Explore this site, the members are courageous to say the least as they voice their opinion against the status quo.
I look at it this way: If, for some, cannabis offers something of value, as it clearly does, then why the prohibition? Is it a big brother issue, as in the Government and can dictate what is moral or ethical behaviour on a "fine" scale? (Face it - we are not talkling murder or child abuse here).
I think we need to divorce ourselves from the emotional elements of this argument and look at what inevitabley might actually work at reducing abuse of drugs and the corruption and crime keeping them 'illegal' actually encourages.
Here is a site which I hope is visited with an open mind. It does not advocate the use of drugs but looks at the problem in a very pragmatic way:
LEAP
Explore this site, the members are courageous to say the least as they voice their opinion against the status quo.