hey. at least that way the complex gets the business its needs.
Well for the moment but that will soon run out and more will be needed. Then what? I don't see 9/11 or Afghanistan as the price of doing business do you?
hey. at least that way the complex gets the business its needs.
As long as Geldof isn't the one doing the raping, of course I would listen to him. If he happened to be a serial rapist, I'd still listen but call him a hypocrite.
To me that equates to the lowest common denominator. That you aren't interested in the message but that there might be some dirt to dig up on the messenger indicates the need for some catastrophic disaster to bleach the industrialized nations gene pool.gc said:As long as Geldof isn't the one doing the raping, of course I would listen to him. If he happened to be a serial rapist, I'd still listen but call him a hypocrite.
Yup, but what I meant was are we just gonna send our money in individually or try to pool five people and send in the whole 450?
There is an interview with "BONO" in the german publication "der spiegel". Google bono and der spiegel for a link. I am not savvy enough to provide a direct link or I would.One of the points that Harper pursued was that countries that recieved aid should be held accountable for how it is spent.Fair enough. Read the interview and ponder bono's attitude towards accountability.
It is easy to cherrypick . My point is that bono seems to believe that spending MY money in Africa is admirable and morally superior even if it is wasted. That is quite easy to say when you are not worrying about the next rent or mortgage payment. From the interview, I believe that he is marching the streets in his regal robes to pour aid in to Africa and it doesn't matter who benefits as long as he lies down at night in his $i,000 hotel room and feels good about himself.
It is easy to cherrypick . My point is that bono seems to believe that spending MY money in Africa is admirable and morally superior even if it is wasted. That is quite easy to say when you are not worrying about the next rent or mortgage payment. From the interview, I believe that he is marching the streets in his regal robes to pour aid in to Africa and it doesn't matter who benefits as long as he lies down at night in his $i,000 hotel room and feels good about himself.
Whatever you prefer is fine with me.
I wonder how much of that money could be paid for by getting rid of the Senate and paying that same money into Africa?