Well, I'm not really sure I'm "supposed" to be doing anything of the sort, but even we take what you say as a given, it's got nothing to do with non-sequitur....I wasn't even making an argument let alone a fallacious one. As for as hominum, if there was any it was very subtle. So subtle that even I was unaware of it.
The only way you saying "its not very often I see somebody manage to get so non sequitur and ad hominem at the same time" makes any sense is if you meant it as a lesson in irony.
please
check the quote you attacked that started this. Harper's being elected doesn't have anything to do with whether other spokespeople are credible or not. and if you can't figure out all you're doing is slagging the messenger too bad.