9-11 Unmasking the Media Perps
- Thread starter Logic 7
- Start date
I knew you wouldn't. You don't have the critical thinking skills to understand what's wrong with your analysis.
I thought we let them become lawyers and scientists or journalists or psycologists I wasn't aware we were just putting them in mental hospitals, maybe that's why everythings turning to crap.:smile:
At some point in time my arse could turn into a pumpkin and I could leave the governors ball. The dollars best chance of strengthening is, in my humblest opinion, conquest and subjugation of the Middle East and it's vast reserves of black gold. Signifigant others also think the same thing they have invested heavily to make that happen.:lol:
I've worked up a figure for you Toro so you'll be able to get the best type of account opened up for the DB fund, we need 22 kilometers of cable, a cable laying crew, permits and bribes, it's not as bad as I thought when you first mentioned it, you/we/thefund should be able to do it for about $300,000 it would be safer to have $320,00, thanks again for your selfless sacrifice. PM me if you have any questions.:smile:
Well i've passed my physics at high shcools, where i've learned the laws of physics, and that is all you need to understand , that WTC 1,2 and 7 were brought down with explosives.
No it's not. You also need to know how to assess evidence and how to think clearly. You claimed in a previous post, for instance, that the towers collapsed in 9.4 seconds, which is indeed how long it would take an object in free fall from the top of one the towers to get to the ground. I saw that collapse several times, as I'm sure you did too. There was so much dust and smoke boiling around the towers during the collapse that it's simply not possible to make that precise a measurement, so any argument based on that has to be suspect. You will also notice, if you look carefully at the videos, that there are things on the edges of the debris cloud as the towers come down that are falling faster than the towers, so clearly they were not coming down in free fall conditions.
Illogic, it'd help if you actually used them along with a bit of rational thought.
For instance one would think it'd be noticeable if several hundred pounds of explosives were being toted into a building that isn't supposed to be holding explosives. Perhaps it could be done if the explosives were being packed into a sublevel, but there were about 8 floors of the first tower to collapse still standing for days after. If the building had been demolished from the basement, those floors would have been flat as well.
For instance one would think it'd be noticeable if several hundred pounds of explosives were being toted into a building that isn't supposed to be holding explosives. Perhaps it could be done if the explosives were being packed into a sublevel, but there were about 8 floors of the first tower to collapse still standing for days after. If the building had been demolished from the basement, those floors would have been flat as well.
Last edited:
I've never understood the precision argument for this reason.
Well, that any many other reasons.
Poppie? yes, it is one of the main reason, when taliban was in power, they got rid of 90% of opium productions in 2000, according to the UNITED NATIONS, it was the best actions against drug dealers around the world, radicals yes, but it worked. However when the us chicken coaltion went in, the opium production came back to the world market.
and more importantly, it is for the OIL-PIPELINE, amid karzai and other who are part of the governement, were unical, a coorporation who,s demands is to build a PIPELINE in afganisthan.
9-11 comission report, says it took 9.5 and 10 sec for the towers to fall, free fall speed at that height is 8.4 sec, WTC 7 fell at 6.5 seconds, free fall speed was 6 sec, the officials explanation for this, is the pancake theory, which is impossible, a pancake theory would have taken more than 45 sec, it was 110 floor buildings , to get those building fell at that speed, you have to have no resistance in the bottom of each floor collapsing. Impossible withouth blowing up the underinfrastructure, just impossible...... that is why there is tons of police reports and firefighters witnesses that says, there was bomb that exploded in the bottom of each building just before it collapse, that is why columbia university recorded 2.1 and 2.3 seismic before each collapse.
Last edited:
Bullstrawberry crap, 8 flloor of the first tower wasnt still standing days after, everything was pulvarized, get your fact straight once for all.