Then why did you so clearly appear to say that you do? I read your post to mean that you think the people who run and contribute to Skeptic and Skeptical Inquirer are "new age gurus and flakes selling half baked self-help manuals." Vol. 12 No. 4 of Skeptic (it's a quarterly, that's the last issue of 2006) contains a thorough, reasonable, and entirely credible debunking of 9/11 conspiracy claims, and so does the September/October 2002 issue of Skeptical Inquirer. I have them in front of me on my desk right now, and I re-read those articles before making this post. There is simply no good evidence any agency of the U.S. government had anything to do with 9/11, and it strains credibility to think that the same 'idiot retards,' in Logic 7's phrase, who were so easily shown to be incompetent liars on the matter of WMDs in Iraq used to justify the original invasion, could pull off a conspiracy and coverup on the scale necessary for the U.S. government to have orchestrated 9/11. I'd immediately agree we don't have all the answers on 9/11 yet, but to think the U.S. government did that to itself is just not believable on the evidence.
They aren't incompetant liars Dex they're very good liars, experts in fact. Somebody destroyed the buildings it precipitated an invasion and occupation of two countrys. There are two suspects, one has all the resources in the known world the other has virtually none. The motive of one is revenge the motive of the other is virtual ownership of the world. The American government did nothing to itself, it snuffed 3000 people and trashed a few buildings, and you cannot buy public relations like that. You cannot galvanize and mobilize a nation without an act just like it.
You believe that the government in question won't do things like 9/11, and I know that they will.The cicumstantial evidence points directly to government involvment. The history of Al-queda is itself suspect having been a construct of the CIA and Pakistani intelligence.
Today I'v read that the known reserves of Iraqi oil could be twice what they were thought to be, those hydro-carbons mean life and death to the transnationals and the system that promotes and hides them, there is literally nothing that they will not do to secure the region.
The claim I made about the magazine was not meant to be taken literally, and I'm surprized that you did I apologize for any discomfort or blood pressure problems you may have experianced. Somehow you don't see the failure of airdefence or any of the other points as valid, that I cannot understand, the questions surrounding the 9/11 attacks have merit, the answers have not been forthcoming, you have a very long list of PHDs as well as thousands of professionals the world over who are not satisfied with the official story, I have satisfied myself about the 9/11 attack, I have no doubt about who the big winners are and they ain't any ragged pseudo-terrorists from the middle east.
One more thing, those idiot retards as you have characterized them have thier fingers on weapons and systems we can only imagine, they have connections in every aspect of the western world, you should not underestimate them. We don't have to disscuss this subject again, you have my feelings and certainly that's all they are, just feelings and supositions, however I do maintain that's all you have as well, and in your case that ammounts to the word of those same aforementioned liars and incompetents. Gooday sir I hope this note finds you in good cheer.:smile:
