half of them would suggest becoming a republic again, honestly so many people seem so intent on breaking up canada into tiny bits
Unite the four provinces into one province with one legislature and one provincial government inside Canada. That allows:
1. Atlantic Canada a larger more unified voice with which to speak in Canada
2. A rationalization and better co-ordination of provincial policies
3. Economic union
4. A region commensurate with other regions in Canada
5. Canada to rationalize seats in parliament, ie have the region give up its over-representation
6. A base on which to start building a regional economy
7. A stronger region in the likely event of Quebec separation
Unite the four provinces into one province with one legislature and one provincial government inside Canada. That allows:
1. Atlantic Canada a larger more unified voice with which to speak in Canada
2. A rationalization and better co-ordination of provincial policies
3. Economic union
4. A region commensurate with other regions in Canada
5. Canada to rationalize seats in parliament, ie have the region give up its over-representation
6. A base on which to start building a regional economy
7. A stronger region in the likely event of Quebec separation
I'd object to number 1 as well. After all if four provinces say something it's gonna mean more to the government than if one large province says it.
Number 5 contradicts Number 1. Which one do you want? Number 1 suggests a stronger voice, Number 5 would mean a smaller weaker voice.
Eliminating the inter-provincial trade barriers allowing growth in trade and business. Having one unified regional economy.Is there any benefit to Number 3? And what do you mean by that, anyway?
The region would have 2.4 million, twice the size of Manitoba but still less then Alberta. It would have the stature of a bona-fide region in Canada, like the others (Quebec, Ontario, The West, BC ...) as opposed to four minor provinces.Number 4 is meaningless without an explanation of what you mean.
But this would help.Number 6 - we kinda have one already
Why?Number 7 is not necessary
Lets be optimistic. We also want to see more effective leadership in addition to union, see our other reforms.Number 2 wouldn't happen anyway. Even by itself, NS can't get its act together. It's still run on a county-by-county basis.