Fentanyl

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,551
3,486
113
California mayor suggests giving homeless 'all the fentanyl they want' to 'purge' problem
Author of the article:Denette Wilford
Published Apr 21, 2025 • Last updated 15 hours ago • 2 minute read

Lancaster, California Mayor R. Rex Parris speaking at the TBI Med Legal Conference in San Diego.
Lancaster, California Mayor R. Rex Parris speaking at the TBI Med Legal Conference in San Diego.
A mayor in Southern California is under fire for comments he made about eliminating his city’s homeless population.


Lancaster Mayor R. Rex Parris said he wants to wipe out the city’s homeless numbers by giving them “all the fentanyl they want.”

He then doubled down on his suggestion, telling KTTV that homeless criminals “need to be purged.”

Parris shared his controversial comments during a city council meeting in February after a resident slammed the city’s attempt to address Lancaster’s homeless crisis by “enclosing” the unhoused at an abandoned golf course near a residential neighbourhood, according to the outlet.

“What I want to do is give them free fentanyl,” Parris said, as he interrupted the woman’s remarks, according to video of the meeting.

“I mean, that’s what I want to do,” the Republic continued. “I want to give them all the fentanyl they want.”


The resident replied that his statement “was not kind.”

Parris, however, stands by his comments, telling the outlet he has no “regrets” but clarified that he was referring to unhoused criminals who “refuse” to get help.


“I made it very clear I was talking about the criminal element that were let out of the prisons that have now become 40% to 45% of what’s referred to as the homeless population,” Parris told KTTV.

“They are responsible for most of our robberies, most of our rapes, and at least half of our murders,” he continued, though Parris, who has been Lancaster’s mayor since 2008, did not offer data to support his claims.

“There’s nothing that we can do for these people,” he added.

Parris said he didn’t think anyone would take his comments “literally,” but added that fentanyl is “so easy” to get that it wouldn’t make a difference if highly addictive opioid was given away on the streets free of charge.


He also noted how his city is providing more “innovative” solutions to the homeless population than any other city in America, before wishing out loud that U.S. President Donald Trump would perform a federal extermination of the issue.

“Quite frankly, I wish that the president would give us a purge. Because we do need to purge these people,” Parris said.

“Now, is it harsh? Of course, it is harsh,” he admitted.

“But it’s my obligation as the mayor of the city of Lancaster to protect the hardworking families that live there, and I am no longer able to do it,” Parris said.

Johnathon Ervin, a Democrat who lost to Parris in the city’s mayoral election last year, told the Los Angeles Times that his former opponent is unfit to hold public office.

“Anyone willing to give homeless people all the fentanyl they want, or to suggest that President Trump should allow a purge of the homeless population, has no business in public office.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
116,488
14,041
113
Low Earth Orbit

Trump looks to end $56 million grant to give Narcan to first responders to help save lives during an overdose​

The Independent US
Mike Bedigan
Fri, April 25, 2025 at 3:12 PM CST
0
The Trump administration is looking at plans to end a $56 million annual grant program that distributes the overdose-countering medication Narcan to first responders across the country, according to a draft proposal.

A preliminary budget document, obtained by The Washington Post, reportedly calls for deep cuts to federal health programs and targets multiple addiction prevention and treatment programs, including training of community responders to administer Narcan.

The Independent understands that the document is pre-decisional, and no final decisions have been made.

Narcan – known generically as naloxone – is a nasal spray that works to reverse the effects of an opioid overdose in two to three minutes. It is widely used to combat overdoses from serious drugs, including fentanyl.

Though state and local governments have alternative resources than federal programs to obtain Narcan, experts are concerned that the axing of the grant may send a message about the government’s view on such training.


Yay!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,551
3,486
113
DEA threat assessment points to fentanyl ’super laboratories’ in Canada
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Kelly Geraldine Malone
Published May 15, 2025 • 2 minute read

A pile of Fentanyl pills
Fentanyl pills are shown in an undated police handout photo.
WASHINGTON — The United States Drug Enforcement Administration’s latest threat assessment says fentanyl “super laboratories” in Canada are a growing source of concern — after U.S. President Donald Trump used cross-border traffic in the deadly drug to justify hitting imports of Canadian goods with tariffs.


The annual report released this week says that while the estimated volume of fentanyl coming from Canada is substantially lower than the amount entering the U.S. from Mexico, “these operations have the potential to expand and fill any supply void created by disruptions to Mexico-sourced fentanyl production and trafficking.”

The DEA pointed out that the RCMP dismantled a sophisticated drug lab in British Columbia last October.

“This year’s report indicates progress in the fight against fentanyl and also outlines the increasing challenges we face with the changing landscape of the synthetic drug crisis,” said DEA acting administrator Robert Murphy in a news release Thursday.

“The adulterating of fentanyl with highly potent, dangerous chemicals reminds us that this fight is far from over.”


Trump used the International Economic Emergency Powers Act, also called IEEPA, to declare an emergency over fentanyl trafficking in order to hit Canada with tariffs in March. He partially paused the tariffs a few days later for imports that comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade.

Canada is also being hit with duties on steel, aluminum and automobiles through a different presidential authority to impose tariffs.

Canada took swift action after Trump issued his initial tariff threat late last year by introducing a $1.3 billion border plan and appointing a “fentanyl czar.” Ottawa announced a Canada-U.S. Joint Strike Force and deployed additional helicopters and drones along the border.

The DEA report says that as of spring 2025, about 50 pounds of “Canada-sourced” fentanyl had been seized at the U.S.-Canada border over 2024, while 20,622 pounds were seized at the U.S.-Mexico border.


It’s not clear if the DEA used U.S. Customs and Border Protection data for its analysis. The agency did not respond when asked whether all of the fentanyl cited in the report originated in Canada or why it chose to include Canada in its most recent report.

Canada was not mentioned once in the DEA’s 2024 drug threat assessment. A March report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence also did not mention Canada in its information about the fentanyl threat.

The RCMP said in March that “there is limited to no evidence or data from law enforcement agencies in the U.S. or Canada to support the claim that Canadian produced fentanyl is an increasing threat to the U.S.”

Trump initially said fentanyl traffic was his reason for imposing tariffs on Canada — but his list of complaints soon expanded to include trade deficits and defence spending as he called for Canada to become part of the U.S.

The president has softened his tone toward Canada in recent weeks, particularly after a meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney at the White House. On Monday, while speaking about fentanyl coming into U.S., Trump said it’s trafficked “much more through the southern border.”
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
116,488
14,041
113
Low Earth Orbit
DEA threat assessment points to fentanyl ’super laboratories’ in Canada
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Kelly Geraldine Malone
Published May 15, 2025 • 2 minute read

A pile of Fentanyl pills
Fentanyl pills are shown in an undated police handout photo.
WASHINGTON — The United States Drug Enforcement Administration’s latest threat assessment says fentanyl “super laboratories” in Canada are a growing source of concern — after U.S. President Donald Trump used cross-border traffic in the deadly drug to justify hitting imports of Canadian goods with tariffs.


The annual report released this week says that while the estimated volume of fentanyl coming from Canada is substantially lower than the amount entering the U.S. from Mexico, “these operations have the potential to expand and fill any supply void created by disruptions to Mexico-sourced fentanyl production and trafficking.”

The DEA pointed out that the RCMP dismantled a sophisticated drug lab in British Columbia last October.

“This year’s report indicates progress in the fight against fentanyl and also outlines the increasing challenges we face with the changing landscape of the synthetic drug crisis,” said DEA acting administrator Robert Murphy in a news release Thursday.

“The adulterating of fentanyl with highly potent, dangerous chemicals reminds us that this fight is far from over.”


Trump used the International Economic Emergency Powers Act, also called IEEPA, to declare an emergency over fentanyl trafficking in order to hit Canada with tariffs in March. He partially paused the tariffs a few days later for imports that comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade.

Canada is also being hit with duties on steel, aluminum and automobiles through a different presidential authority to impose tariffs.

Canada took swift action after Trump issued his initial tariff threat late last year by introducing a $1.3 billion border plan and appointing a “fentanyl czar.” Ottawa announced a Canada-U.S. Joint Strike Force and deployed additional helicopters and drones along the border.

The DEA report says that as of spring 2025, about 50 pounds of “Canada-sourced” fentanyl had been seized at the U.S.-Canada border over 2024, while 20,622 pounds were seized at the U.S.-Mexico border.


It’s not clear if the DEA used U.S. Customs and Border Protection data for its analysis. The agency did not respond when asked whether all of the fentanyl cited in the report originated in Canada or why it chose to include Canada in its most recent report.

Canada was not mentioned once in the DEA’s 2024 drug threat assessment. A March report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence also did not mention Canada in its information about the fentanyl threat.

The RCMP said in March that “there is limited to no evidence or data from law enforcement agencies in the U.S. or Canada to support the claim that Canadian produced fentanyl is an increasing threat to the U.S.”

Trump initially said fentanyl traffic was his reason for imposing tariffs on Canada — but his list of complaints soon expanded to include trade deficits and defence spending as he called for Canada to become part of the U.S.

The president has softened his tone toward Canada in recent weeks, particularly after a meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney at the White House. On Monday, while speaking about fentanyl coming into U.S., Trump said it’s trafficked “much more through the southern border.”
I can see the DEA wanting to make Canada the 51st State.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
28,510
10,736
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Vancouver, renowned for its natural beauty and laid back lifestyle, has a human waste problem so bad that businesses have hired “poop fairies” to speed the cleanup on city sidewalks.

Dodging human and dog waste has become a real problem for pedestrians navigating the city’s sidewalks, and it’s not just a problem plaguing the Downtown Eastside. The city’s own feces removal response program can’t seem to keep up so business improvement districts have hired the “poop fairies.”

“Everybody down here feels that you end up walking in stuff no matter where you go. So, basically, it’s getting tracked around,” said Dave Hamm, vice president of the Vancouver Network of Drug Users, which counts about 3,000 people in its membership.

He’s encountered people defecating in public on the city’s Downtown Eastside.

“What are you going to do? You give them their privacy,” Hamm said. “It’s in the alleys more than the sidewalk.”
Vancouver launched its feces removal program four years ago “to address feces complaints submitted through 311 and to proactively patrol and collect feces in the Downtown and Downtown Eastside areas of Vancouver,” Doug Thomas, who speaks for the city, said in an email.

Hepatitis A outbreaks have been linked to public defecation, said Lezlie Lowe, author of No Place To Go: How Public Toilets Fail our Private Needs.

“There are many diseases that are carried in feces, and we don’t necessarily think it’s going to affect us, but we step in feces accidentally and we bring that, and the pathogens in it, into our homes,” Lowe said.

“If you’re out on a nice patio enjoying a beer and some nachos and a fly lands on some human s–t and then comes and lands on the cheese on your nachos, it’s serious.”
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Taxslave2

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,181
3,940
113
Edmonton
Vancouver, renowned for its natural beauty and laid back lifestyle, has a human waste problem so bad that businesses have hired “poop fairies” to speed the cleanup on city sidewalks.

Dodging human and dog waste has become a real problem for pedestrians navigating the city’s sidewalks, and it’s not just a problem plaguing the Downtown Eastside. The city’s own feces removal response program can’t seem to keep up so business improvement districts have hired the “poop fairies.”

“Everybody down here feels that you end up walking in stuff no matter where you go. So, basically, it’s getting tracked around,” said Dave Hamm, vice president of the Vancouver Network of Drug Users, which counts about 3,000 people in its membership.

He’s encountered people defecating in public on the city’s Downtown Eastside.

“What are you going to do? You give them their privacy,” Hamm said. “It’s in the alleys more than the sidewalk.”
Vancouver launched its feces removal program four years ago “to address feces complaints submitted through 311 and to proactively patrol and collect feces in the Downtown and Downtown Eastside areas of Vancouver,” Doug Thomas, who speaks for the city, said in an email.

Hepatitis A outbreaks have been linked to public defecation, said Lezlie Lowe, author of No Place To Go: How Public Toilets Fail our Private Needs.

“There are many diseases that are carried in feces, and we don’t necessarily think it’s going to affect us, but we step in feces accidentally and we bring that, and the pathogens in it, into our homes,” Lowe said.

“If you’re out on a nice patio enjoying a beer and some nachos and a fly lands on some human s–t and then comes and lands on the cheese on your nachos, it’s serious.”
That is SOOOO disgusting!
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
28,510
10,736
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Let the junkies die.
Well, I preferred the Conservatives plan towards a solution but…parts of Canada elected Carney due to Trump-Fear instead of Canadian choices for Canadian issues…
1747490476741.jpeg
So here we are, and I haven’t had to clean up human waste off my garage pad since…last Fall. I’d prefer to see Junkies become productive members of society again, but let’s see where we’re at in another four years I guess. What was Carney’s stance on this again?
1747491243599.jpeg
(YouTube & How federal leaders plan to address B.C.'s toxic drug crisis)
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
28,510
10,736
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
How many started out as productive in the first place?
Good question! I don’t know the answer. How many did start out productive in the first place?

(I know once they’re on that shit, whether they started out productive or not, they aren’t any longer…and crime goes up, and safety goes down, etc…)

The junkies I see, in my opinion, are unemployable, so not capable of self supporting whatsoever…yet there they are. Someone or something is paying for this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
116,488
14,041
113
Low Earth Orbit
Good question! I don’t know the answer. How many did start out productive in the first place?

(I know once they’re on that shit, whether they started out productive or not, they aren’t any longer…and crime goes up, and safety goes down, etc…)

The junkies I see, in my opinion, are unemployable, so not capable of self supporting whatsoever…yet there they are. Someone or something is paying for this.
Obviously there is a process to becoming a junkie. Intervention would need to be prior to or at the tipping point. Getting to where they knowingly risk death just to get high is a point in life where productive no longer exists.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Taxslave2

Taxslave2

House Member
Aug 13, 2022
4,864
2,780
113
And still our socialist government in BC thinks free drugs is good for everyone. So far as I can see, the only ones benefiting from the free drug supply are the pharmaceutical companies that the government buys from, and taxpayer funded social workers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
28,510
10,736
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Obviously there is a process to becoming a junkie. Intervention would need to be prior to or at the tipping point. Getting to where they knowingly risk death just to get high is a point in life where productive no longer exists.
And still our socialist government in BC thinks free drugs is good for everyone. So far as I can see, the only ones benefiting from the free drug supply are the pharmaceutical companies that the government buys from, and taxpayer funded social workers.
Ok, so a front end and a “Now” solution is in order. What’s your plan gentlemen?

A decade ago going backwards, the lid was still on, but now, what lid exists for the “Now” situation (?) and what do we do for the current & future junkies?
 

Taxslave2

House Member
Aug 13, 2022
4,864
2,780
113
Ok, so a front end and a “Now” solution is in order. What’s your plan gentlemen?

A decade ago going backwards, the lid was still on, but now, what lid exists for the “Now” situation (?) and what do we do for the current & future junkies?
I'm all in favour of mandatory treatment for addicts. I realize the success rate is depressingly low, but it does work. Dealers and importers should just be executed. This may be a bit extreme, but I just don't see anything else being effective.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
116,488
14,041
113
Low Earth Orbit
Ok, so a front end and a “Now” solution is in order. What’s your plan gentlemen?

A decade ago going backwards, the lid was still on, but now, what lid exists for the “Now” situation (?) and what do we do for the current & future junkies?
Make it illegal to be high in public. Make getting high a giant pain in the ass to accomplish.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
28,510
10,736
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
I'm all in favour of mandatory treatment for addicts. I realize the success rate is depressingly low, but it does work. Dealers and importers should just be executed. This may be a bit extreme, but I just don't see anything else being effective.
Something has to be done, and a stand made. The status quo isn’t working as demonstrated over the last decade.

15yrs ago I never really expected to find vandalism to our property, etc…on a daily basis (not that it didn’t happen but if it did, it was unexpected), but now daily I go out looking for paint on our garage door, or windows broken out of our vehicles, etc…& I personally believe that all ties back to the drug trade…& how it has been addressed (or not been addressed) in the last decade.
Make it illegal to be high in public. Make getting high a giant pain in the ass to accomplish.
I’m all for it! What about switching the cultural norms to make it unacceptable to be a junkie instead of just treating it as an illness as that doesn’t seem to be working?

Like littering (with most people) is completely frowned upon, and you say something if you see somebody doing it. Perhaps this needs to be done with the whole junkie situation?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

Taxslave2

House Member
Aug 13, 2022
4,864
2,780
113
The problem is that being a junkie is an illness. It is an addiction, same as alcohol or tobacco. Addictions can be treated, but it is far easier to prevent them from starting in the first place. 'I've fought with all of them starting in early teens. I won because I decided I had better things to do with my life than laying on the sidewalk puking. Lost a few friends that were not so lucky. I still have the odd beer and glass of wine and a joint now and then, but I haven't had a hangover in 45 years, and the last cigarette was in February 2001.
I think the way it works is you have to want to quit. Being told doesn't work.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
28,510
10,736
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
That’s why I suggested a change in cultural norms.

Using Japan as an example, even though public garbage cans are few and far between (because terrorists were hiding explosives in public garbage cans a couple decades ago), littering is almost nonexistent…because it’s more than frowned upon.

How do we change cultural norms so that drug addiction is more than frowned upon, so that people decide they want to do more with their lives other than being complete pariahs…& not having their addictions coddled by society?

1747497473056.jpeg
1747497502952.jpeg
(Discouraging Negative Behaviours is the big one here I believe)
1747497567609.jpeg
If this is a big part of the solution, how would we go about doing something like this?