Drawing parallels.
He has no legal basis for his claim.Drawing parallels.
House Democrats get locked out of the department of education | we’re members of congress
youtube.com youtube.com
Whats different about the video above to this type of situation below.
A husband gets a text while not around so wife checks the text which reads "hey sexy" and far more in other texts from an unknown number. She confronts hubby and of course he denies. A few minutes later "ding" another provocative text on his phone so she grabs the phone, runs to the bathroom and locks the door.
While she is going through his phone proving an affair he is banging on the door yelling "thats my phone you cant go through it, Im calling the police because youre violating my right to privacy, Ill get a judge to stop you."
Whats different?
Right but she can use what she found on his phone to take him to the cleaners in divorce court.He has no legal basis for his claim.
Yeah, so? Maybe he shoulda kept his dick in his drawers.Right but she can use what she found on his phone to take him to the cleaners in divorce court.
Parallels. I guess USAID should have locked up their chequebook to avoid indictments.Yeah, so? Maybe he shoulda kept his dick in his drawers.
Paralleling "privacy" with divorce law is kinda like paralleling nuclear physics with elephants.Parallels. I guess USAID should have locked up their chequebook to avoid indictments.
There a skip order you need attend to?Paralleling "privacy" with divorce law is kinda like paralleling nuclear physics with elephants.