So I guess the Hunter Biden special Council's should be dismissed as unlawful. And every other one too.
Special counsel - Wikipedia
Interesting how both sides have used them.
Now all of them... should never have happened?
Supreme Court Ruling on if a sitting president can be charged.
- Thread starter Retired_Can_Soldier
- Start date
So I guess the Hunter Biden special Council's should be dismissed as unlawful. And every other one too.
Interesting how both sides have used them.
Now all of them... should never have happened?
Like the Democrat judge and Persecuting Attorney in Trumps trumped up ( pardon the pun) charges in New York?
No, I dispute that the special-counsel law applies to a New York State case where there was no special counsel.
"Jesus! It's like playing cards with my brother's kids!"
--Johnny Tyler, Tombstone
Not to Tax. To Tax anybody who questions the purity and innocence of His Holey-ear-ness is EEE-VIL!
You should read the Thomas immunity decision, it will never be reversed it maybe resurrected when legal authority is confirmed
Last edited:
Yep as long it is done legally by POTUS appointing and the Congress confirming or using an acting senate confirmed prosecutor within the congressional budget
You mean the part where he brings up the special council when it's not even PART of that case what so ever?
Where by doing so he's gone against ALL SCOTUS precedent?
What Cannon just did will be taken to the local Appeals and hopefully they'll tell her she's full of shit, the SC was lawful and then maybe finally Jack Smith will do something about her obvious deference to Trump. And sure, it'll make it's way to the SCOTUS, and who knows what'll happen then.
But if SCOTUS DOES rule that actually special council's are no longer legal... that'll be fucking hilarious for the Republicans and their Hunter Biden and other investigations that use them.
Georgia will never appeal the decision especially after f'ing up the special handler decision
You think the state of Georgia has something to do with Federal special counsel.
Ohh-KAY.
I'm pretty sure we're talking two different cases.
This is the Florida Trump stole shit he shouldn't have that was Government property and displayed it to anyone and everyone at Mar-A-Lago.
Georgia has nothing to do with that case at all.
It does in Moosie's head!
"To save a fool from his folly the gods themselves contend in vain."
--Various, this version Isaac Asimov
Has to be formed by 2 branches of the Gov. appointed by the Executive and confirmed by the legislative branch to be independent. The independent council appointed by the AG is gone since the Nixon days
Oh yeah that one will get tossed too my bad but Florida will not appeal the decision but are under the same district of appeals
Established by Congress in 1981, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit has jurisdiction over federal cases originating in the states of Alabama, Florida and Georgia.
About the Court | Eleventh Circuit | United States Court of Appeals
www.ca11.uscourts.gov/about-court
“Even if the Special Counsel has a valid office, questions remain as to whether the Attorney General filled that office in compliance with the Appointments Clause,” Thomas said. “For example, it must be determined whether the Special Counsel is a principal or inferior officer. If the former, his appointment is invalid because the Special Counsel was not nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate, as principal officers must be. Even if he is an inferior officer, the Attorney General could appoint him without Presidential nomination and senatorial confirmation only if ‘Congress . . . by law vest[ed] the Appointment’ in the Attorney General as a ‘Hea[d] of Department.”
Clarence Thomas thinks Jack Smith was unlawfully appointed (lawandcrime.com)