North Korea’s Kim orders ‘exponential’ expansion of nuke arsenal

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
35,881
3,048
113
North Korea’s Kim orders ‘exponential’ expansion of nuke arsenal
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Hyung-jin Kim
Published Dec 31, 2022 • Last updated 6 hours ago • 4 minute read

SEOUL, South Korea — North Korean leader Kim Jong Un ordered the “exponential” expansion of his country’s nuclear arsenal and the development of a more powerful intercontinental ballistic missile, state media reported Sunday, after he entered 2023 with another weapons launch following a record number of testing activities last year.


Kim’s moves are in line with the broad direction of his nuclear program. He has repeatedly vowed to boost both the quality and quantity of his arsenal to cope with what he calls U.S. hostility. Some experts say Kim’s push to produce more nuclear and other weapons signals his intention to continue a run of weapons tests and ultimately solidify his future negotiating power and win greater outside concessions.


“They are now keen on isolating and stifling (North Korea), unprecedented in human history,” Kim said at a recently ended key ruling party meeting, according to the official Korean Central News Agency. “The prevailing situation calls for making redoubled efforts to overwhelmingly beef up the military muscle.”


During the six-day meeting meant to determine new state objectives, Kim called for “an exponential increase of the country’s nuclear arsenal” to mass produce battlefield tactical nuclear weapons targeting South Korea. He also presented a task to develop a new ICBM missioned with a “quick nuclear counterstrike” capability — a weapon he needs to strike the mainland U.S. He said the North’s first military reconnaissance satellite will be launched “at the earliest date possible,” KCNA said.

“Kim’s comments from the party meeting reads like an ambitious — but perhaps achievable — New Year’s resolution list,” said Soo Kim, a security analyst at the California-based RAND Corporation. “It’s ambitious in that Kim consciously chose to spell out what he hopes to accomplish as we head into 2023, but it also suggests a dose of confidence on Kim’s part.”


Last month, North Korea claimed to have performed key tests needed for the development of a new strategic weapon, a likely reference to a solid-fueled ICBM, and a spy satellite.

Kim’s identification of South Korea as an enemy and the mention of hostile U.S. and South Korean policies is “a reliable pretext for the regime to produce more missiles and weapons to solidify Kim’s negotiating position and concretize North Korea’s status as a nuclear weapons power,” Soo Kim said.

Later Sunday, South Korea’s Defence Ministry reiterated a warning that that any attempt to use nuclear weapons by North Korea “will lead to the end of the Kim Jong Un government.” The U.S. military has previously made similar warnings.

“The new year started but our security situation is still very grave,” South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol told top military officers during a video conference. “Our military must resolutely punish any provocation by the enemy with a firm determination that we dare to risk fighting a battle.”


Senior diplomats from South Korea, the U.S. and Japan spoke by phone and agreed that provocations by North Korea would only deepen its international isolation and prompt their trilateral security cooperation. They still reaffirmed that the door to dialogue with North Korea remains open, according to the South Korean Foreign Ministry.

Since his high-stakes summitry with then-President Donald Trump collapsed in 2019 due to wrangling over U.S.-led sanctions, Kim Jong Un has refused to return to talks with Washington and taken steps to enlarge his arsenal. Some observers say Kim would eventually want to make North Korea a legitimate nuclear power so as to win the lifting of international sanctions and the end of the regular U.S.-South Korean military drills that he views as a major security threat.


“It was during his 2018 New Year’s speech that (Kim) first ordered the mass production of warheads and ballistic missiles, and he’s doubling down on that quantitative expansion goal in the coming year,” said Ankit Panda, an expert with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Panda said the reference to a new ICBM appears to concern a solid-propellant system, which could be tested soon. He said a satellite launch could take place in April, a month that includes a key state anniversary.

Worries about North Korea’s nuclear program have grown since the North last year approved a new law that authorized the preemptive use of nuclear weapons in a broad range of situations and openly threatened to use its nuclear weapons first. During last week’s party meeting, Kim reiterated that threat.


Earlier Sunday, South Korea’s military detected a short-range ballistic missile launched from the North’s capital region. It said the weapon traveled about 400 kilometres (250 miles) before falling into the water between the Korean Peninsula and Japan. The U.S. Indo-Pacific Command said that the U.S. commitments to defend South Korea and Japan “remain ironclad.”


North Korea test-fired more than 70 missiles last year, including three short-range ballistic missiles detected by South Korea on Saturday. The testing spree indicates the country is likely emboldened by its advancing nuclear program. Observers say the North was also able to continue its banned missile tests because China and Russia have blocked the U.S. and others from toughening UN sanctions at the Security Council.


KCNA confirmed Sunday that the country conducted the test-firings of its super-large multiple rocket launcher on Saturday and Sunday. Kim Jong Un said the rocket launcher puts all of South Korea within striking distance and is capable of carrying a tactical nuclear warhead, according to KCNA.

“Its recent missile launches were not technically impressive. Instead, the high volume of tests at unusual times and from various locations demonstrate that North Korea could launch different types of attack, anytime, and from many directions,” said Leif-Eric Easley, a professor at Ewha University in Seoul.

Animosities between the rival Koreas have further deepened since early last week, when South Korea accused North Korea of flying drones across their heavily fortified border for the first time in five years and responded by sending its own drones toward the North.
 

Serryah

Executive Branch Member
Dec 3, 2008
8,986
2,076
113
New Brunswick
North Korea’s Kim orders ‘exponential’ expansion of nuke arsenal
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Hyung-jin Kim
Published Dec 31, 2022 • Last updated 6 hours ago • 4 minute read

SEOUL, South Korea — North Korean leader Kim Jong Un ordered the “exponential” expansion of his country’s nuclear arsenal and the development of a more powerful intercontinental ballistic missile, state media reported Sunday, after he entered 2023 with another weapons launch following a record number of testing activities last year.


Kim’s moves are in line with the broad direction of his nuclear program. He has repeatedly vowed to boost both the quality and quantity of his arsenal to cope with what he calls U.S. hostility. Some experts say Kim’s push to produce more nuclear and other weapons signals his intention to continue a run of weapons tests and ultimately solidify his future negotiating power and win greater outside concessions.


“They are now keen on isolating and stifling (North Korea), unprecedented in human history,” Kim said at a recently ended key ruling party meeting, according to the official Korean Central News Agency. “The prevailing situation calls for making redoubled efforts to overwhelmingly beef up the military muscle.”


During the six-day meeting meant to determine new state objectives, Kim called for “an exponential increase of the country’s nuclear arsenal” to mass produce battlefield tactical nuclear weapons targeting South Korea. He also presented a task to develop a new ICBM missioned with a “quick nuclear counterstrike” capability — a weapon he needs to strike the mainland U.S. He said the North’s first military reconnaissance satellite will be launched “at the earliest date possible,” KCNA said.

“Kim’s comments from the party meeting reads like an ambitious — but perhaps achievable — New Year’s resolution list,” said Soo Kim, a security analyst at the California-based RAND Corporation. “It’s ambitious in that Kim consciously chose to spell out what he hopes to accomplish as we head into 2023, but it also suggests a dose of confidence on Kim’s part.”


Last month, North Korea claimed to have performed key tests needed for the development of a new strategic weapon, a likely reference to a solid-fueled ICBM, and a spy satellite.

Kim’s identification of South Korea as an enemy and the mention of hostile U.S. and South Korean policies is “a reliable pretext for the regime to produce more missiles and weapons to solidify Kim’s negotiating position and concretize North Korea’s status as a nuclear weapons power,” Soo Kim said.

Later Sunday, South Korea’s Defence Ministry reiterated a warning that that any attempt to use nuclear weapons by North Korea “will lead to the end of the Kim Jong Un government.” The U.S. military has previously made similar warnings.

“The new year started but our security situation is still very grave,” South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol told top military officers during a video conference. “Our military must resolutely punish any provocation by the enemy with a firm determination that we dare to risk fighting a battle.”


Senior diplomats from South Korea, the U.S. and Japan spoke by phone and agreed that provocations by North Korea would only deepen its international isolation and prompt their trilateral security cooperation. They still reaffirmed that the door to dialogue with North Korea remains open, according to the South Korean Foreign Ministry.

Since his high-stakes summitry with then-President Donald Trump collapsed in 2019 due to wrangling over U.S.-led sanctions, Kim Jong Un has refused to return to talks with Washington and taken steps to enlarge his arsenal. Some observers say Kim would eventually want to make North Korea a legitimate nuclear power so as to win the lifting of international sanctions and the end of the regular U.S.-South Korean military drills that he views as a major security threat.


“It was during his 2018 New Year’s speech that (Kim) first ordered the mass production of warheads and ballistic missiles, and he’s doubling down on that quantitative expansion goal in the coming year,” said Ankit Panda, an expert with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Panda said the reference to a new ICBM appears to concern a solid-propellant system, which could be tested soon. He said a satellite launch could take place in April, a month that includes a key state anniversary.

Worries about North Korea’s nuclear program have grown since the North last year approved a new law that authorized the preemptive use of nuclear weapons in a broad range of situations and openly threatened to use its nuclear weapons first. During last week’s party meeting, Kim reiterated that threat.


Earlier Sunday, South Korea’s military detected a short-range ballistic missile launched from the North’s capital region. It said the weapon traveled about 400 kilometres (250 miles) before falling into the water between the Korean Peninsula and Japan. The U.S. Indo-Pacific Command said that the U.S. commitments to defend South Korea and Japan “remain ironclad.”


North Korea test-fired more than 70 missiles last year, including three short-range ballistic missiles detected by South Korea on Saturday. The testing spree indicates the country is likely emboldened by its advancing nuclear program. Observers say the North was also able to continue its banned missile tests because China and Russia have blocked the U.S. and others from toughening UN sanctions at the Security Council.


KCNA confirmed Sunday that the country conducted the test-firings of its super-large multiple rocket launcher on Saturday and Sunday. Kim Jong Un said the rocket launcher puts all of South Korea within striking distance and is capable of carrying a tactical nuclear warhead, according to KCNA.

“Its recent missile launches were not technically impressive. Instead, the high volume of tests at unusual times and from various locations demonstrate that North Korea could launch different types of attack, anytime, and from many directions,” said Leif-Eric Easley, a professor at Ewha University in Seoul.

Animosities between the rival Koreas have further deepened since early last week, when South Korea accused North Korea of flying drones across their heavily fortified border for the first time in five years and responded by sending its own drones toward the North.

But, but, he sent Trump the most beautiful letters. The best. Like Love letters... how could such a man as Kim then do these things? (please note the heavy sarcasm)
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
10,616
5,259
113
Olympus Mons
But, but, he sent Trump the most beautiful letters. The best. Like Love letters... how could such a man as Kim then do these things? (please note the heavy sarcasm)
Make all the fun you want, Trump is STILL the only world leader outside of China to have ever met diplomatically and spoken directly with any North Korean dictator since the division of Korea. At least he tried.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
10,616
5,259
113
Olympus Mons
How nice. 1/3 of the adult population in NK is suffering from malnutrition and 1/2 of all kids 12 and under suffer from malnutrition. "But hey, we gots money fer like nukes and shit 'cuz the US might invade us."

Yeahhhh no, not gonna happen. The world already saw what happened when MacArthur tried chasing the Norks all the way back to the Yalu River. China did not react well.
 

Serryah

Executive Branch Member
Dec 3, 2008
8,986
2,076
113
New Brunswick
Make all the fun you want, Trump is STILL the only world leader outside of China to have ever met diplomatically and spoken directly with any North Korean dictator since the division of Korea. At least he tried.

Tried what though? He met with him, he sucked his ass so much the man (Kim, not Trump) lost weight and yet look at what happened after and since. One moment of MAYBE sanity between the Korea's... and it was gone just as quick as it appeared.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,414
11,455
113
Low Earth Orbit
Tried what though? He met with him, he sucked his ass so much the man (Kim, not Trump) lost weight and yet look at what happened after and since. One moment of MAYBE sanity between the Korea's... and it was gone just as quick as it appeared.
Should Trump go back since Biden won't?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,649
7,103
113
Washington DC
Tried what though? He met with him, he sucked his ass so much the man (Kim, not Trump) lost weight and yet look at what happened after and since. One moment of MAYBE sanity between the Korea's... and it was gone just as quick as it appeared.
Just this once (well, a few other times as well) I'll give Trump a little bit of credit. He totally hosed it up with his bizarre, homoerotic rhapsodizing about Kim, but I've always felt that refusing to talk with a recognized head of state or government is counter-productive and just plain stupid. Performative outrage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

Serryah

Executive Branch Member
Dec 3, 2008
8,986
2,076
113
New Brunswick
Just this once (well, a few other times as well) I'll give Trump a little bit of credit. He totally hosed it up with his bizarre, homoerotic rhapsodizing about Kim, but I've always felt that refusing to talk with a recognized head of state or government is counter-productive and just plain stupid. Performative outrage.

I might agree with you if Trump had been able to 'do' anything.

He didn't.

It was - as most things are with him - just a show piece and wasn't meant to be anything more than a trophy. So I can't hold his even meeting Kim as something 'worthwhile'.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,649
7,103
113
Washington DC
I might agree with you if Trump had been able to 'do' anything.

He didn't.

It was - as most things are with him - just a show piece and wasn't meant to be anything more than a trophy. So I can't hold his even meeting Kim as something 'worthwhile'.
True, of course. This was how Trump handled problems. Make a gesture, milk it for the attention, and for followup, nothing at all.

Conceptually, however, I think refusing to talk is stupid. We should continue to send a Deputy Assistant Secretary of State now and then.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Serryah

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
10,616
5,259
113
Olympus Mons
I might agree with you if Trump had been able to 'do' anything.

He didn't.

It was - as most things are with him - just a show piece and wasn't meant to be anything more than a trophy. So I can't hold his even meeting Kim as something 'worthwhile'.
Blah blah blah. The only US president in decades who didn't get the US involved in yet another war. Not only that but the man hilariously accused of being a "warmonger" even reduced America's involvement in the conflicts the US was a part of/responsible for before he ran for president.

As for "I might agree with you if Trump had been able to 'do' anything", I guess you're right. I mean nothing really came of it so I guess the lesson is, if you don't know for sure you'll succeed, don't even bother trying. How inspirational. Maybe he should'a just sent Dennis Rodman to play more b-ball with little Kim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

Serryah

Executive Branch Member
Dec 3, 2008
8,986
2,076
113
New Brunswick
Blah blah blah. The only US president in decades who didn't get the US involved in yet another war. Not only that but the man hilariously accused of being a "warmonger" even reduced America's involvement in the conflicts the US was a part of/responsible for before he ran for president.

Well, I don't call him a warmonger so...

Because you're right, his America First policy meant pulling back everything no matter how it might affect the security of the US.

So that last bit - you saying it's because of him the US is out of Afghanistan? Great news! One thing people blame Biden for that isn't on him finally acknowledged!

As for "I might agree with you if Trump had been able to 'do' anything", I guess you're right. I mean nothing really came of it so I guess the lesson is, if you don't know for sure you'll succeed, don't even bother trying.

Nah, that's not the lesson. The Lesson is, Trump is in no way, shape or form the person people think he is to affect change in the world what so ever.

It's not that Trump went there that's the issue. Trump went there, PRAISED Kim, and bragged about their "love letters", and STILL nothing changed. The ONLY thing he 'succeeded' in, is showing the world he doesn't know SFA about diplomacy or even his own "art of the deal". And giving N. Korea the 'validation' it has been demanding, without getting anything solid in return FOR that validation (like concessions to stop starving his own people, an actual stop to nuclear missile research instead of "well maybe we'll stop".)

Had Trump managed to get North Korea to stop doing anything and make that stick for longer than a handful of months, THEN he'd get credit for doing something no president has done since the war there. His trip to Singapore should have been to augment what his negotiation teams did with N. Korea, not go off script, as it were, and risk allies in the process.


How inspirational. Maybe he should'a just sent Dennis Rodman to play more b-ball with little Kim.

Dennis Rodman was only in N. Korea for the same reason Trump was - clout seeking.

But, I WILL alter my stance a little.

Trump did do something there that I guess he can be given credit for; he made it look possible to TRY and work with Kim, the conditions just have to be 'right'.

https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-p...-gambit-what-worked-what-didnt-and-whats-next ------ an interesting opinion piece that sums up what happened and clarified a few things to change my stance.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,649
7,103
113
Washington DC
Blah blah blah. The only US president in decades who didn't get the US involved in yet another war. Not only that but the man hilariously accused of being a "warmonger" even reduced America's involvement in the conflicts the US was a part of/responsible for before he ran for president.

As for "I might agree with you if Trump had been able to 'do' anything", I guess you're right. I mean nothing really came of it so I guess the lesson is, if you don't know for sure you'll succeed, don't even bother trying. How inspirational. Maybe he should'a just sent Dennis Rodman to play more b-ball with little Kim.
Ford. Carter.

And what do you call his missile strike on the Syrian airfield?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Serryah

Taxslave2

House Member
Aug 13, 2022
2,798
1,695
113
I might agree with you if Trump had been able to 'do' anything.

He didn't.

It was - as most things are with him - just a show piece and wasn't meant to be anything more than a trophy. So I can't hold his even meeting Kim as something 'worthwhile'.
Much the way Tricky Dickie didn't "DO" anything when he met with the Chinese.