Biological speaking….yeah it exists…so there must be a reason for it….& no, I’ve no idea why but I just accept it for what it is.
2SLGBTQQIA+
- Thread starter B00Mer
- Start date
In all honesty, I think it’s the first time I’ve actually used the term, & I’ve no idea if it’s an abbreviation or what have you.
I think we as a nation should all unit regardless of our sexual orientations or whatever unimportant horseshit distracts us from the big picture. We should unite against a common cause, & I nominate “Justin Trudeau” as that cause to unite against. Do I get a second on the nomination?
How so? Let’s drop the American Southern State extremism distraction for a second & enter a couple of hypotheticals:
1) If some Teacher/Preacher/Authority Figure molests children….but only children of the opposite sex, does that make them gay (?) or just some monster Paedophile that should be fed through a wood chipper?
2) If some Teacher/Preacher/Authority Figure molests children…but only children of the same sex, does that make them gay (?) or just some monster Paedophile that should be fed through a wood chipper?
3) If some Teacher/Preacher/Authority Figure molests children…regardless of the child’s gender, does that make them gay (?) or just some monster Paedophile that should be fed through a wood chipper?
Now, either all of the above are “Yes” to verify your opinion that being gay & Paedophilism are related “closer that someone would think”…..or some of the above are “Yes” and some are “No” throwing the homosexuality & paedophilism handshake you’re advocating out the window…or all are “No” which also would toss out the handshake you’re selling.
Hypothetical #1 above is the swing vote. If you say “Yes” to all of the above, explain how you come to that conclusion with #1 please.
Attraction to someone of the same gender (& I have no idea if I’m using the correct terminology, but that’s probably unimportant for this line of thought), & attraction to children, are two separate and very different things. Being a kiddie-diddler, just like being a rapist in a same sex prison (I’m assuming) has little bearing on orientation and almost everything to do with power & opportunity.
What about convicts (both men and women) in same sex only prisons. Do they not know any better (?) or is it power & opportunity (?) or something else again?
It's power/opportunity.
I've always thought it amazingly ironic that for some people, the only way to 'get the gay/trans/whatever' out of a person is to force rape on them. How many people have been gang raped because they were gay, trans, etc?
IMO that's just proof, to me, for some people sex is only about power and has nothing to do what it should be about.
It is an abbreviation of "cisgender/cissexual" and it basically means you are the gender/sex you were assigned at birth.
I despise it because TERFS, FemNazi's and other hateful asshats "in the community" us it as a slur against anyone who is Cis. To me it's no more right to use that than it is to use "tranny" for Trans people or "Faggot" for gay people.
Honestly I wish the whole thing could be gotten rid of and all that someone needs to be 'called' is their name.
It’s power and opportunity.. of course.
They know better, but are just caged animals
%5 of the population is trans/gay/whatever give it a fucking rest..
There are far more gang rapes and sex slaves in the heterosexual market..
Even Netflix and Disney are both learning that when you pander to 5% of the population at the expense of 95% it doesn’t go so well.
Also I’m tired of hearing about what people do in the bedroom.. FFS keep it there.. that’s for everyone
I've stated this before...
We've made great strides in the areas of race, women's issues, mental health, LGBTQ,...etc. Of course there's tons of work left to do. But with all of this improvement has come the 'language' baggage.
The parsing and dissection of every word we use to describe something has become a disease. Just on this thread alone I was accused of saying gay children shouldn't exist! Why? Because I stated the fact that being gay is not the norm.
It's the hysterical language police on the far left who have no shame in trying to destroy you over a single misunderstood comment. Yes, the far right has it's share of knuckle-dragging neanderthals, but there are moderates on both sides.
My old buddy just last night said, "I'm center left, and you're center right. If more politicians were like us, the world would be a better place."
No shit.
We've made great strides in the areas of race, women's issues, mental health, LGBTQ,...etc. Of course there's tons of work left to do. But with all of this improvement has come the 'language' baggage.
The parsing and dissection of every word we use to describe something has become a disease. Just on this thread alone I was accused of saying gay children shouldn't exist! Why? Because I stated the fact that being gay is not the norm.
It's the hysterical language police on the far left who have no shame in trying to destroy you over a single misunderstood comment. Yes, the far right has it's share of knuckle-dragging neanderthals, but there are moderates on both sides.
My old buddy just last night said, "I'm center left, and you're center right. If more politicians were like us, the world would be a better place."
No shit.
It's a variation in sexuality, observed widely throughout nature.
Might could almost call it a "normal" variation.
That ain't how evolution works. What's the reason for an appendix?
The standard for evolution. . . or special creation, if that's how your crazy manifests. . . ain't "there's a reason." It's "If a particular variation causes you to die, it will eventually work itself out of the species. If it has no particular effect, it will continue. If it improves the chances of breeding, it will spread through the population."
Might as well try to find a "reason" for gravity or momentum.
Well, you've seen right here that lots of people do care. Enough to discriminate, illegalize, and murder.
That's why it's an issue. The sexually variant didn't all suddenly get together at a meeting of the Great Big Icky-Sex Conspiraceeee! and decide to impose themselves on the world, seeking as much attention as possible and special, superior legal status.
They were put there by people who wanted to, and did, shun, imprison, and murder them.
That's why it's a big deal. Maybe that's what you're missing.
Yup. I can just imagine what the Comedy Clubs are like today.
Comedian: “So a guy walks into a bar…”
Heckler: "Why is it always a guy? Why can’t you have a woman walking into a bar?? That’s very sexist of you!
Comedian: “(Ahem)…So a woman walks into a bar…”
Another heckler: “Why can’t the person walking into the bar be transgendered??”
Comedian: (Sheesh!) So a transgendered person walks into a bar…"
A different heckler: “Why can’t the person walking into the bar be disabled??”
Comedian: "I’m f*cking outta here!
Comedian: “So a guy walks into a bar…”
Heckler: "Why is it always a guy? Why can’t you have a woman walking into a bar?? That’s very sexist of you!
Comedian: “(Ahem)…So a woman walks into a bar…”
Another heckler: “Why can’t the person walking into the bar be transgendered??”
Comedian: (Sheesh!) So a transgendered person walks into a bar…"
A different heckler: “Why can’t the person walking into the bar be disabled??”
Comedian: "I’m f*cking outta here!
Yeah. Language both expresses and affects thoughts and attitudes. Surprise!
And you and your buddy basically were saying "Can't we just all get along?"
I would suggest that empirical evidence definitively says "No, we can't."