To IMPEACH ????

Tecumsehsbones

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,150
9,431
113
Washington DC
Moosie, Post #2080. . .

Quote: Originally Posted by Ocean Breeze View Post

Top diplomat says there was a 'quid pro quo' involving aid to Ukraine and probe of Bidens, in his bluntest characterization yet
In his prepared testimony for the House Intelligence Committee, Gordon Sondland, the ambassador to the European Union, said more directly than he ever had before that President Trump and his personal lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, sought to condition an important White House invitation for Ukraine��s new president to demands that his country publicly launch investigations that could damage Trump��s Democratic political opponents.
Sondland also told the committee that while he never knew for sure if the White House had frozen nearly $400 million in security assistance as part of the pressure campaign against Ukraine, he operated as if that was the case.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...ational&wpmk=1
Click to expand...

You and they must not be listening to the same hearing that I am, he said inexplicitly no 'Quid pro quo'
Click to expand...

Let's roll the tape. . .


Poor Moosie. His lies are just falling apart all over the place.
 
A

AnnaEmber

Council Member
Aug 31, 2019
1,931
0
36
Kootenays BC
Ocean Breeze said:
Well state.
Seems that the articles of impeachment should include: "bribery"........extortion. ABUSE of power , Threat to national security.
The ambassador (picked by Trump ) who was reckless enough to make a public cell phone cal to the POTUS........ was breaking protocol. The fact the call was over heard makes it insecure. The contents of the cal are evidence of extortion behavior by the POTUS. The MAGA defenders can try to dissect it, spin it wit all kinds of alternative nonsense..............it does not change the bare facts.
Those who do the dissing and poster bashing........have NOTHING ELSE to offer to the discussion.
Click to expand...
Yup. Jusst like the spin that it was the Ukraine that was influencing the last election. As it turns out, that is exactly what Putin wants so the spotlight is on the Ukraine, not him. And I betcha Trumplicans are swallowing that tank of bilgewater, too. lol
 
Twin_Moose

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Twin_Moose said:
Yep
CONTRADICTING TESTIMONIES: Mike Turner RIPS into Amb. Sondland
Click to expand...
Twin_Moose said:
How about another one since you like videos
I WANT NOTHING: Jim Jordan Repeats Trump Saying No Ukraine Extortion
Click to expand...
Tecumsehsbones said:
Moosie, Post #2080. . .
Let's roll the tape. . .
Poor Moosie. His lies are just falling apart all over the place.
Click to expand...

I guess you never watched the top one that smashes your narrative, now I added another for you not to watch
 
Ocean Breeze

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48
AnnaEmber said:
Yup. Jusst like the spin that it was the Ukraine that was influencing the last election. As it turns out, that is exactly what Putin wants so the spotlight is on the Ukraine, not him. And I betcha Trumplicans are swallowing that tank of bilgewater, too. lol
Click to expand...
Trump is doing Putins work for him by crippling Ukrainian.........as Ptin would love to get a hold of Ukraine ........

Interesting.....Putin is working with a master plan............while Trump is helping him by reinforcing all those crazy conspiracy theories. which were spawned by Putin's Russia to deflect any negative attention..........and the fact that Russia is behind all this stuff. Trump is just making a fool of himself by believing what Putin is creating..............as opposed t o his own intelligence staff. Technically Trump is a TRAITOR.

.......they are trying to block J. Bolton's Twitter account.............

He just might testify........and look out.......as he knows where many bodies are buried.
 
Ocean Breeze

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48
AnnaEmber said:
And you Trumplicans sure emote. lol
Click to expand...
........do they ever........but their emoting is targeted at people..............not facts. Anyone watching the hearings.......saw just how the republicans operate. Nasty character assassinations.......are the style of Trumpicans. Sorry.....NOT the true republicans who at least use d to have some good sense. They have been converted to Trumpicans .And have adopted the Mafia style gang mentality and MO .
 
Tecumsehsbones

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,150
9,431
113
Washington DC
Twin_Moose

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Tecumsehsbones said:
You claimed that Sondland said there was "no quid pro quo." That was a lie.
Now that the lie has been exposed, you've changed your story to "others disagree with Sondland that there was a quid pro quo."
Was Donnie Dodger your boxing coach?
"Lie! Lie! Lie! Duck! Dodge! Divert! Lie! Lie!"
Click to expand...

What's going on? You must have watched the top one to go off the deep end like this, from the horses mouth that he was wrong about his earlier testimony, in fact he called Shifty a liar for running out and giving CNN the exclusive.
 
A

AnnaEmber

Council Member
Aug 31, 2019
1,931
0
36
Kootenays BC
Ocean Breeze said:
........do they ever........but their emoting is targeted at people..............not facts. Anyone watching the hearings.......saw just how the republicans operate. Nasty character assassinations.......are the style of Trumpicans. Sorry.....NOT the true republicans who at least use d to have some good sense. They have been converted to Trumpicans .And have adopted the Mafia style gang mentality and MO .
Click to expand...
Experts at shooting the messengers and ignoring the messages.
It's almost like they intend to rip the Constitution and the rule of law with their "alternative" facts.
 
A

AnnaEmber

Council Member
Aug 31, 2019
1,931
0
36
Kootenays BC
JLM said:
More like your ilk who does all the nattering on here. You're one of the ones who buy all this "he said, she said shit" that seems to qualify as news.
Click to expand...
It may be news to some, but it's corroborating evidence. Kind of a waste of time, though, because any impeachment will be stopped in its tracks by the Senate. But it is entertaining watching you votaries and suckers turn yourselves inside out defending the dude.
 
Ocean Breeze

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48
Tecumsehsbones said:
You claimed that Sondland said there was "no quid pro quo." That was a lie.

Now that the lie has been exposed, you've changed your story to "others disagree with Sondland that there was a quid pro quo."

Was Donnie Dodger your boxing coach?

"Lie! Lie! Lie! Duck! Dodge! Divert! Lie! Lie!"
Click to expand...
and what seems to be selective listening on the Trumpicans part They will defend that guy.......no matter what he does. It is quite astonishing.

Trump intimidates witnesses......virtually on live TV.......and it is just fine by the Trumpians. They have a serious case of Trump brainwashing. They can't even tell right from wrong and what is against the constitution. Actually what they do is frame the info .....and facts to fit their preconceived support for the guy..a guy to whom lying and intimidation is the SOP
 
Last edited:
Twin_Moose

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Ocean Breeze said:
and what seems to be selective listening on the Trumpicans part They will defend that guy.......no matter what he does. It is quite astonishing.
Trump intimidates witnesses......virtually on live TV.......and it is just fine by the Trumpians. They have a serious case of Trump brainwashing. They can't even tell right from wrong and what is against the constitution.
Click to expand...

Pop the links on the PBS coverage that I provided and listen with your own ears there is no selective hearing needed
 
Twin_Moose

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
AnnaEmber said:
It may be news to some, but it's corroborating evidence. Kind of a waste of time, though, because any impeachment will be stopped in its tracks by the Senate. But it is entertaining watching you votaries and suckers turn yourselves inside out defending the dude.
Click to expand...

Oh? would hearsay be allowed in a court of law? How about in the Senate trial? Hint it is a no on both counts
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom