That's the classic slippery slope. Do we start judging organ recipients on their diets, exercise, whether or not they chose a dangerous profession, &c.?
Do they get extra points for being in the so-called caring professions? What about criminal records?
And whom is to be the judge of virtue? PLEASE don't say "the government."
IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
First off - you are a YANKEE and it aint your damned biz to tell us in a foreign country what to do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The fact that you persist anyway is simply proof of your asshat personality!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No need to lecture Cdns when 25 percent of YOUR citizens have NO MEDICAL COVERAGE AT ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As for transplanted Livers - NO NEED to WASTE the limited supply on DRUNKEN IDIOTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BEST USE should govern who gets chosen for one of the few available!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The SOBER citizen with a genetic defect that needs a transplant remedy will make better use than the drunken idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The younger citizen will make better use than the SENIOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hard choices must be made - and IT HELPS to be HONEST about it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE ONLY people profiting from this PHONY RIGHTS DEBATE......................................
are the STINKING LAWYERS who have decided it is easier talking about "rights" for drunks.........................
than it is to bother CHASING AMBULANCES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What a SHAMELESS IDIOT ARGUMENT LIE-berals present!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!