I guess your math skills are non existent because you have your pants down.This year?
135 billion was last year, 18 billion is so far this year, duh.
Got yer condom on, or are you still beating up on INNOCENT catholic boys.
I guess your math skills are non existent because you have your pants down.This year?
Simply telling Democrats that Trump is for a policy turns them against it . Even universal health care goes from polling 64 % to 48 % in favour when told Trump supports it . Yikes sadstate of affairs .Breaking news ... Walls do work
https://www.unionleader.com/opinion...cle_ed6ef135-9a85-5c4c-b54e-c87232153b55.html
Yep.
Yep, 700 miles of wall across trackless, uninhabitable, impassable hardpan desert where nobody crosses anyhow is an idea only a Canadian rightard could favor.Simply telling Democrats that Trump is for a policy turns them against it . Even universal health care goes from polling 64 % to 48 % in favour when told Trump supports it . Yikes sadstate of affairs .
Apparently congress isn’t giving him one .Yep, 700 miles of wall across trackless, uninhabitable, impassable hardpan desert where nobody crosses anyhow is an idea only a Canadian rightard could favor.
Fiscally responsible conduct from Congress is so rare I'm not sure what to make of it.Apparently congress isn’t giving him one .
I wonder why he didn't ask when the republicans were in control.Apparently congress isn’t giving him one .
Ah, so only the established political elite have the right to rule over us "wage monkeys". Is that it? And what exactly do you mean by a reasonably successful tenure as Secretary of State? Having an illegal e-mail server? Facilitating the sale of Uranium One to their sworn enemy? Handing out diplomatic passes in a pay to play scheme? I'm not sure how scandal after scandal is considered a reasonably successful tenure as SoS."Able to do the job." In this case, as evidenced by reasonably successful tenures as a senator and Secretary of State.
Clinton would have been a forgettable, mediocre president.
Trump will certainly never be forgotten.
I wonder why he didn't ask when the republicans were in control.
Too busy I guess.
Have you ever seen a bot with a drill bit in it's head?Hey climate liar He didn't have the votes in the senate how many times do you have to be answered?
That's a piss poor argument.your link is from 2017
It isn't an argument.That's a piss poor argument.
Just add the caravans to that to bring it up to date.
How could he not have the votes in a republican controlled senate?
Sounds like a bunch of bullshit to me.
A typo on my part and not important to the facts and that's all you can comment on?It isn't an argument.
In the same way that pointing out that your link is from 2017 isn't actually math.