Good point ;-)Correct me if i'm wrong but if they somehow manage, against all odds, to keep the entire caravan out of the good ole US of A does that not disprove the need for a wall?
Never were they ever, anywhere, anytime.They were actually non biased then too
One of the finer principles of democracy that involved checks and balances...and what is now a foreign word: accountability.There was a time way back when a free press was an integral part of a democracy. Now, they are the "enemy of the people" which is clearly a symptom of a failing democracy.
The C B C was never "unbiased". Just selecting which stories to cover requires bias. That's the way the world be, bye.Are you talking about CBC? They were critical, but not openly biased
Correct me if i'm wrong but if they somehow manage, against all odds, to keep the entire caravan out of the good ole US of A does that not disprove the need for a wall?
The C B C was never "unbiased". Just selecting which stories to cover requires bias. That's the way the world be, bye.
It's not possible for any of them to be "neutral".I agree that's why I included them as a question to you, the rest of the MSM tried to stay neutral until the last couple of decades