What I learned at the People’s Vote march

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,298
1,947
113
On the streets of central London with thousands of ill-informed Remainers...

COFFEE HOUSE

What I learned at the People’s Vote march

Lloyd Evans
22 October 2018
The Spectator



Two beliefs obsess the Remain cause. First, that voters were lied to during the referendum campaign. (Questionable). Second, that the negotiations are being botched. (Indisputable). But while Remainers believe that their opponents are fibbers, they can’t see that they too are being misled. At the People’s Vote rally last Saturday, I found general acceptance of these four myths.

1. Brexit is a ‘far-right’ policy.
2. Europe will be closed to Britons after we leave.
3. The EU is run by saints who negotiate in good faith.
4. A second vote will heal the divisions caused by Brexit.

The rally was vast and good-tempered. Many demonstrators had come to be photographed rather than to protest. An Elvis-impersonator rode a yellow tricycle with a registration plate, ‘EUELVIS.’ A bald gent of about 50 who looked like a maths professor held up a home-made sign. ‘Terrible decision. Appallingly executed. I demand a final say.’ I could hear his querulous headmasterly tone as he inked the words onto his placard.

I asked several protestors what question should be posed in the second referendum. Many said they didn’t know. Some had difficulty understanding what I was asking. One chap proposed a three-part question. ‘No deal. May’s deal. Or Remain.’ A deaf old boy with a sign that read ‘RIP Brexit’ gave me the pithiest answer. ‘Now you’ve had time to think about it – Leave or Remain?’ No one I met was bothered about democratic legitimacy. A re-run would mean ‘more democracy’, I was told. The Remain side is a magnet for all kinds of fretful types with unspecified fears. A pensioner held up a placard foretelling war after Brexit. ‘War against whom?’ I asked. ‘I don’t know,’ she shrugged. ‘They’re always having wars.’

Many of these fears arise from ignorance. A female protestor paraded an EU passport with the words ‘citizen of nowhere’ scrawled across it, as if to suggest that Brexit will render everyone in Europe stateless. I asked her to develop her argument. ‘****ing stupid Cameron didn’t get the zeitgeist,’ she said, ‘shot himself in the foot with a boobytrap of his own making.’ Admiring her mixed metaphors I asked her what she did for a living. ‘Criminal defence barrister.’

Most believe, or claim to believe, that all cross-channel travel will end in March 2019, and that Britain will become a prison-camp like North Korea. An angry mother had this scribbled on her placard: ‘I travelled freely in the EU. I want my daughters to do the same.’ She seemed unaware that 39 countries already enjoy visa-free access to the EU, and that Britain is almost certain to join this group – unless Brussels wants to wreck the tourist industries of France, Spain, Greece, Portugal, Malta, and elsewhere. Remainers also fear, again without warrant, that the government seeks to cripple the NHS by deporting millions of immigrants on Brexit Day. Few of them seem to have heard Theresa May’s repeated promises that EU citizens’ rights will be protected. Perhaps they run screaming from the room whenever she appears on TV.

The rally’s focus was Parliament Square where various celebs were introduced by Mariella Frostrup and Richard Bacon. They hosted the gig like a pair of washed-up comics entertaining a geriatric ward on Christmas Day as a favour: lots of giggling and flirting, no preparation. Richard told us that Britain’s future was linked to his bout of pneumonia last July. ‘The NHS saved me – now it’s time to save the NHS’. In other words, cancel Brexit in case my cough gets worse. Mariella cracked jokes. ‘The bus from Inverness has just arrived. It left on the day of the referendum.’ She tittered again as she introduced the follow-up campaign, ‘Write This Wrong’, which urges Remainers to send a letter to their MP. Those unfamiliar with the word ‘letter’ were helped out by the hosts who paraded a dummy postcard and an inflatable Biro the size of a baseball bat.

Several activists followed. Delia Smith, a millionaire cook in a green and yellow scarf (Norwich City colours), made us feel guilty for disrupting her busy Saturday. ‘I wouldn’t miss a Norwich City match for anything but I just had to be here.’ Phil Wilson, Sedgefield MP, filled Parliament Square with his rich Geordie accent. ‘The north-east will suffer most,’ he shuddered, like a mopey bumpkin in a Monty Python sketch. Anna Soubry made an angry speech accusing MPs – not herself, of course – of failing the electorate. When Sadiq Khan was introduced, and began ‘I am! The mayor of London!’ rather weirdly. He proceeded to blame Brexit on elected politicians, (other than himself). The ever-suave Chuka Umunna accused Brexiteers of ‘trying to divide the nation’. It had slipped his mind that the EU sought to partition us with a frontier down the Irish Sea. ‘Investment is stalling,’ he went on, holding Britain’s negotiators solely responsible for every snag. Like all head-in-the-clouds Remainers he refuses to see the truth. The EU needs a botched Brexit in order to discourage future escape attempts. Chukka couldn’t leave the stage without challenging the notion, yet again, that the Remain cause is a gentlemen’s club for pampered yuppies. ‘They call me a member of the liberal metropolitan elite,’ said the privately-educated lawyer in his charming Prince William accent. ‘Nothing could be further from the truth’.

A young Ulsterwoman foresaw bloodshed. ‘One border post, one police officer’, she warned, ‘would be the perfect target for paramilitaries wanting to re-ignite violence.’ Mrs May has repeatedly ruled out a visible border in Ireland and Leo Varadkar told his parliament that there would be no hard border, even in the event of no-deal. So this young woman’s speech was bizarrely ill-informed. And her belief that any divergence from her policy will lead to a renewal of bloodshed sounds like an encouragement to wannabe terrorists. This was the most chilling statement of the afternoon.

But then Caroline Lucas stood up. ‘Democracy didn’t die on June 23, 2016,’ she said. And she’s right. Democracy triumphed on that day. But her statement is prompted by the view that any democratic decision rejected by her is ‘democracy dying.’ That’s not democracy, it’s despotism.

https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2018/10/what-i-learned-at-the-peoples-vote-march/
 
Last edited:

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
All the UK is showing that it is a police state and the Crown still runs thinks with the same iron fist they always have. Does the popular vote get shelved when Muslims are the greater number. The greatest fear the whole West has about Muslims being in control is they will treat the ones in power right now just like they have been treating the Muslims since the first Holy War against them, 'hunted to the point of extermination' is the usual method employed.


Once the Royals are disbanded, as they are 'extremists warmongers and racist of the highest order (as they alone have elevated themselves to the status of deserving more than another person, and the Jewish bank has been replaced by an interest free Gentile Bank that serves all the people rather than just the 'Royals' and the amount now spent on war is spent on social programs the odd of a revolt happening to bring back the good old days will not be anywhere on the list of things to do.
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,550
4,131
113
Edmonton
The fear mongering is incredible and I would have thought that Brits were more informed. That's truly appalling and I fear could result in an even more divisive UK. Who, if anyone Blackleaf, is attempting to get the truth out there?


Still doesn't make any sense why Brits would want decisions made on their behalf by people in another country. Simply can't get my head around that at all.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
The idea of the Eu is to enable the transfer of goods and services between trading partners.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,298
1,947
113
The fear mongering is incredible and I would have thought that Brits were more informed. That's truly appalling and I fear could result in an even more divisive UK. Who, if anyone Blackleaf, is attempting to get the truth out there?

Ukip!
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,298
1,947
113
The idea of the Eu is to enable the transfer of goods and services between trading partners.

The idea of the EU is to destroy the nationhood and sovereignty and uniqueness and national traditions of each of its Member States and turn each one into nothing more than a province of a United States of Europe, with each province (former proud sovereign nation) consumed into mundane Euroness.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,298
1,947
113
The British people, in their wisdom, voted to regain their great nation's sovereignty and keep alive their unique heritage and traditions and culture and stop them being consumed by mundane pan-EU Euroness.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,298
1,947
113
Coffee House

Did 750,000 people really attend the People’s Vote march?


Charles Moore






Charles Moore
25 October 2018
The Telegraph

If you think about it, it is obvious that The People’s Vote march last Saturday in London could not have been attended by 750,000 people, as its organisers allege. That is the equivalent of every man, woman and child in Edinburgh, Oxford and Cambridge (to take three Remain-voting cities). Sky News reported that the organisers claimed more than 500,000 (itself a preposterous figure), and by Monday this had swollen in most reports by 250,000. Only the Sunday Telegraph mentioned that such estimates are dubious.

It was a big march, certainly (and mostly an amiable one), but visibly much smaller than the march against the Iraq war in 2003 (two million claimed by the organisers, probably more like 300,000) and the Countryside Alliance’s Liberty and Livelihood March of 2002 (organisers and police roughly agreed on 400,000). Of course, I do not know how many were there on Saturday (I would guess about 150,000), but nor does anyone. And that is the point. Earlier this year, I checked with the Metropolitan Police. They told me they no longer produce their own estimates of crowd numbers, leaving it to organisers to announce the figures. This cop-out (mot juste) makes it much more likely that the march’s numbers will be successfully exaggerated for propaganda reasons because there is no objective check. The police would be the right people to provide one because, for public order reasons, they need to know about crowd sizes, and they have the helicopters. Numbers are the most important propaganda element in almost any demonstration, yet they have been allowed to become fictional.

This article is an extract from Charles Moore’s Spectator notes, available in this week’s magazine.

https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2018/10/did-750000-people-really-attend-the-peoples-vote-march/

 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,550
4,131
113
Edmonton
The idea of the Eu is to enable the transfer of goods and services between trading partners.



So what's the issue? Why would they need to be part of the EU in order to facilitate that? Did they not have "trade" prior to joining?
Still doesn't make sense to me.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
it isn't very complicated. It is a simple economic union that acts as an umbrella under which the UK transacts business with all the european countries they have always dealt with.


thats all it does.

the idea that it usurps british national interest is sort of typical right wing nonsense.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,997
8,408
113
B.C.
it isn't very complicated. It is a simple economic union that acts as an umbrella under which the UK transacts business with all the european countries they have always dealt with.


thats all it does.

the idea that it usurps british national interest is sort of typical right wing nonsense.
Why does the EU set immigration quotas ?
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
they set immigration quotas because of the unprecedented number of immigrants arriving in europe.

its an attempt to deal with that problem.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,997
8,408
113
B.C.
they set immigration quotas because of the unprecedented number of immigrants arriving in europe.

its an attempt to deal with that problem.
Which has what to do with trade?
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,298
1,947
113
it isn't very complicated. It is a simple economic union that acts as an umbrella under which the UK transacts business with all the european countries they have always dealt with.


thats all it does.

the idea that it usurps british national interest is sort of typical right wing nonsense.

513 million people would say you're very wrong.
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,550
4,131
113
Edmonton
Still don't understand why the Brits would want to give up sovereignty to someone else. Having rules and regulations on Trade, Immigration, et al implemented by someone other than your government who would be unable to change anything it doesn't like, doesn't sound particularly appealing to me, so yeah, I think I would have voted for Brexit as well.