Maybe you might want to elaborate ? Was South Africa a sparsely populated land prior to colonization by Portuguese and Dutch traders , later followed by Dutch and English settlers ?Because black people in South Africa used to own land until the white people took it away?
Not how it happened.
Because black people in South Africa used to own land until the white people took it away?
Not how it happened.
Yes but it goes even further back .It's the millions of (Rhodesians) who fled from Mugabe and poured into S.Africa that have nothing and they will take what they want from black or white S.Africans.
Rhodesia got rid of their white farmers when they changed the name to Zimbabwe , how is that working out for them ?
lol its fun to make stuff up.
The pendulum swings left and then right. Maybe some day it will settle in the center... maybe not. Indigenous peoples all over the world have good reason to be pissed at white settlers. Maybe some day in the distant future we will grow up and learn to get along.
Yes, because white people do not discriminate and have no prejudice cuz they'll get anybody, even their own.You do know that their was white natives that had their land taken over as well even by white settlers, Genghis Khan's clan was guilty of this as well. My ancestor's moved to Canada because of it![]()
Yes, because white people do not discriminate and have no prejudice cuz they'll get anybody, even their own.
BTW, wasn't Genghis Khan oriental?
I wasn't aware Khan conquered the Brits.Yes and Yes
Since he was your ancestor does that make it alright?
Ancestor would be wrong more of a blood relative