The patronizing sh*t you're proposing (on a par with your foolish plans to criminalize sex) have also been tried, and improved nothing. So why not?
Nice to see your mastery at re-inventing failed ideas continues in the new year.
Really? Please feel free to go line by line with an example of a historical precedent for most of them that has not worked?
As for funding for trades and professional education, that has helped the poor in a number of jurisdictions around the world. Prohibition didn't work because it was excessive. But show me a jurisdiction that has tried a legalized version of a speakeasy (i.e. that must hide behind a front business, with strict advertising rules, etc. but just short of being totally criminalized).
Show me a jurisdiction that requires financial institutions to give their clients the tools to limit their access to their own debit cards should they wish to do so. Now or historically.
show me a jurisdiction that requires a smartphone to come with Screentime, Mobicip, or some other similar app reinstalled to make the owner aware of its existence? Now Singapore is known for internet sensorship especially of pornography, and it's also one of the wealthiest states in the world when it comes to per capita GDP. Yet I'm not even proposing state sensorship but rather just making the owner of a smartphone aware of the existence of tools to help him sensor himself if he wants to.
Oh, and TB, there is a difference between sex and fornication. How many times do I have to tell you? Even science would agree that curbing the rate of fornication would reduce the spread of STIs and the rate of single motherhood. No?