Some of the things mentioned in the second article such as allowing the Ten Commandments on the public square simply deal with free expression. As for his 'controversial' interpretation of the Bible. Scripture is not the open ended, subjective, relative, conformable, sentimental and eccentric document that modern society has attempted to dismiss it as, at least in terms of its moral structure. It is however a testament of authentic freedom.
And it is the seminal and founding source of Western Civilization. It's only controversial in the eyes of the liberal political and media establishment because it flies in the face of the dystopian vision they promote. That is of a culture without rules, without responsibilities, without consequences and without REAL dignity and respect for human life or natural law.
Last edited: