I like how you post graphics as if you've seen the raw data and fully understand it. Regardless, this graphic still proves nothing about it being human driven.
And that's the beauty of this new scam. There's no way to demonstrably show the average person the difference between naturally released CO2 and other naturally occurring GHGs and those same GHGs generated by human activity.
And considering the hilariously faulty "scientific method" I've seen used to "prove" that humans produce over 100x the CO2 that volcanoes do on an annual basis, I have good reason to seriously question the whole AGW argument.
Every scientist in every study has come to the conclusion that there is climate change and it is due to man.
Even the latest and most extensive study conducted by the White House came to this conclusion:
"This assessment concludes, based on extensive evidence, that it is extremely likely that human activities, especially emissions of greenhouse gases, are the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th Century. For the warming over the last century, there is no convincing alternative explanation supported by the extent of the observational evidence,"
What more can science do?
Does science have to come to your house and educate you for 10 years until you are able to comprehend what is at this point a simple and clearly perceived truth?
