Scientists Plan to Replace Fossil Fuels With Nuclear Fusion by 2030

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
Scientists Plan to Replace Fossil Fuels With Nuclear Fusion by 2030



FUSION 2030

Nuclear fusion is premised on building technology that would replicate the reaction that naturally powers our Sun — two light atoms, in this case, hydrogen, are fused together under extreme temperatures to produce another element, helium.
The process would release vast amounts of clean energy drawn from an almost limitless fuel source, with nearly zero carbon emissions. However, it has yet to be done on a scale that would make it usable. Canadian scientists are hoping to change that, announcing plans to harness and develop nuclear fusion technology so they can deliver a working nuclear fusion plant prototype by 2030.

What they need, however, is for the government to invest in their vision. According to Fusion 2030, a report prepared by the University of Alberta, the University of Saskatchewan, and several companies, the group will need around $125 million to bring nuclear fusion to reality — a relatively minor investment considering the goal is to establish an operational, scalable plant that could soon replace oil and gas.

“There’s an opportunity here … we need to see an investment in research capacity and academia in order to make sure we’re producing the graduates with the skills that can contribute in this field,” Michael Delage, Chief Technology Officer of General Fusion, the second largest private fusion lab in North America, tells CBC News.



The funding isn’t meant to go directly towards General Fusion. Instead, they plan to distribute the investment among several research groups, universities, and organizations that share the same goal. Once the prototype plant is ready, the report asserts that private companies will play a big role in commercializing the technology.

“The technology we are using is an approach that we think has inherent cost advantages to do it,” Delage adds. “Once you build one of these and it begins to become commercially viable, we think we can be competitive with the grid.”

THE FUTURE OF NUCLEAR FUSION

It almost seems too good to be true — an energy source that can be drawn from one of the most abundant elements on Earth, at a very low cost, that doesn’t hurt the environment — but in an era when our dependence on fossil fuels is starting to take its toll on the planet, it’s about time we start to put serious thought and investment toward more sustainable alternatives.

The report highlights the potential of nuclear fusion as perhaps the most valuable renewable energy option by virtue of its having the highest energy density of any source, the best energy payback ratio (EPR), and the lowest carbon footprint among all sustainable sources available today.

“The clean energy source is available just about anywhere in the world — you can extract it from water. It’s something that we can build anywhere,” says Delage. “There is so much going on in this field across the world. We really believe by 2030 we’re going to see demonstration plants being built. We’d love to see that in Canada, and we could get there if we start to invest now.”

All things considered, nuclear fusion could indeed be what the world needs to make the definitive switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy. But it will need both the support of private companies and government organizations to make the technology available at a commercial scale.

https://futurism.com/scientists-plan-to-replace-fossil-fuels-with-nuclear-fusion-by-2030/
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
Scientists Plan to Replace Fossil Fuels With Nuclear Fusion by 2030



FUSION 2030

Nuclear fusion is premised on building technology that would replicate the reaction that naturally powers our Sun — two light atoms, in this case, hydrogen, are fused together under extreme temperatures to produce another element, helium.
The process would release vast amounts of clean energy drawn from an almost limitless fuel source, with nearly zero carbon emissions. However, it has yet to be done on a scale that would make it usable. Canadian scientists are hoping to change that, announcing plans to harness and develop nuclear fusion technology so they can deliver a working nuclear fusion plant prototype by 2030.

What they need, however, is for the government to invest in their vision. According to Fusion 2030, a report prepared by the University of Alberta, the University of Saskatchewan, and several companies, the group will need around $125 million to bring nuclear fusion to reality — a relatively minor investment considering the goal is to establish an operational, scalable plant that could soon replace oil and gas.

“There’s an opportunity here … we need to see an investment in research capacity and academia in order to make sure we’re producing the graduates with the skills that can contribute in this field,” Michael Delage, Chief Technology Officer of General Fusion, the second largest private fusion lab in North America, tells CBC News.



The funding isn’t meant to go directly towards General Fusion. Instead, they plan to distribute the investment among several research groups, universities, and organizations that share the same goal. Once the prototype plant is ready, the report asserts that private companies will play a big role in commercializing the technology.

“The technology we are using is an approach that we think has inherent cost advantages to do it,” Delage adds. “Once you build one of these and it begins to become commercially viable, we think we can be competitive with the grid.”

THE FUTURE OF NUCLEAR FUSION

It almost seems too good to be true — an energy source that can be drawn from one of the most abundant elements on Earth, at a very low cost, that doesn’t hurt the environment — but in an era when our dependence on fossil fuels is starting to take its toll on the planet, it’s about time we start to put serious thought and investment toward more sustainable alternatives.

The report highlights the potential of nuclear fusion as perhaps the most valuable renewable energy option by virtue of its having the highest energy density of any source, the best energy payback ratio (EPR), and the lowest carbon footprint among all sustainable sources available today.

“The clean energy source is available just about anywhere in the world — you can extract it from water. It’s something that we can build anywhere,” says Delage. “There is so much going on in this field across the world. We really believe by 2030 we’re going to see demonstration plants being built. We’d love to see that in Canada, and we could get there if we start to invest now.”

All things considered, nuclear fusion could indeed be what the world needs to make the definitive switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy. But it will need both the support of private companies and government organizations to make the technology available at a commercial scale.

https://futurism.com/scientists-plan-to-replace-fossil-fuels-with-nuclear-fusion-by-2030/

We won't want to get near any car accident scene that's for sure.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Im still waiting for the ice age promised to us in the 60s.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Yes, bodies walk in through this little door over here, and little square chunks of pressurized carbon come out in this little slot over here.
:)



You wanna turn lead into gold? Just make it a necessary ingredient in suntan oil.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
"Scientists plan" ... I like that one. Scientists have been working steadily on fusion reactors for sixty years and they have't got very far. They still suck times more energy than they produce. The scientists have "planned" to have a sudden breakthrough for the 75th anniversary? It's like the jet pack Futurist thing all over.

Maybe, scientists will figure out that to have a really efficient fusion reactors it has to be big-big ...like star-sized big but that would be dangerous. What would an optimum safe distance away be? Say 93 million miles, maybe? And how do you plug into this super efficient fusion reactor? Well, the interface would look a lot like a solar panel... but it wouldn't be one because solar panels are fuctardlibtarddemdumsocialistsnowflakeobamiecommie and only the limp-wristed and Hillary Clinton would want one of those.

How are scientists going to replace fossil fuel with a fusion reactor in 13 years? They're going to develop a better solar panel that plugs directly in to the incredibly large, steady and efficient fusion reactor at the core of our planetary system.


It's a con job to get funding.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
Nuclear fusion is the philosopher's stone of energy tech. It might be possible, but I wouldn't hold my breath.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Fusion is simply a difficult technology. Zero point energy is the philosopher's stone. And will someday be as common as electricity.

Fusion is simply a difficult technology.That has something to do with the extremely high energy yields from fusion reactions. What's a safe distance away to have a fusion reactor? Try 93 million miles.

Anyway, it sure ain't happening by 2030. Maybe 2130. I'll believe that.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,548
9,614
113
Washington DC
Fusion is simply a difficult technology.That has something to do with the extremely high energy yields from fusion reactions. What's a safe distance away to have a fusion reactor? Try 93 million miles.

Anyway, it sure ain't happening by 2030. Maybe 2130. I'll believe that.
Don't be ridiculous. Fusion doesn't work like dynamite. It doesn't just blow up. You have to apply lots and lots of brainpower and huge piles of money to make it blow up.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Don't be ridiculous. Fusion doesn't work like dynamite. It doesn't just blow up. You have to apply lots and lots of brainpower and huge piles of money to make it blow up.

We already have a rather beautiful, self regulating, self fueling fusion reactor at our disposal. Maybe, this is all about funding perpetual motion machines.


Lost a bundle on your "cold fusion" investment, did you?
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,548
9,614
113
Washington DC
We already have a rather beautiful, self regulating, self fueling fusion reactor at our disposal. Maybe, this is all about funding perpetual motion machines.


Lost a bundle on your "cold fusion" investment, did you?
You spread your spiritual butterfly wings and get all your energy needs from Father Sol now, OK, Skydancer?
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
You spread your spiritual butterfly wings and get all your energy needs from Father Sol now, OK, Skydancer?

That's what fusion power is at this point in our development. We may yet find that it is the safest, most reliable fusion option in spite of the right wing politics that the technology faces. What that will mean is that the rest of the world will pass the USA by while improving this technology ... again.