Gravity occurs instantaneously and this cannot be modelled by computer code

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
The strangeness of Newton’s gravity equation is that it only deals with two bodies and no more. Just as strange as Coulomb’s Law that describes the force between two electrically charged bodies, with the difference being that Coulomb’s law deals with both attraction and repulsion while Newton’s only attraction. Both equations are of the form F=Constantxb1xb2/d^2. In gravity’s case b is the weight of the body compared to the earth, and is always positive; there is no such thing as a negative weight, if such a force can be measured in the first place. It easily follows that for the Coulomb Law b is the electric charge on the body, either positive or negative. “d” is the distance between the two bodies, in this case squared.
(As an aside, one could write computer code to numerically predict the three body problem but it is the nature of computer coding that each line of code introduces the time factor as a result of precedence, since parallel instantaneous numerical calculation is not possible. Hence the probable explanation why 3-body modelling evolves into chaotic motion. Gravity occurs instantaneously and this cannot be modelled by computer code).http://lhcrazyworld.wordpress.com
 

selfsame

Time Out
Jul 13, 2015
3,491
0
36
The "gravity" and the "magnetism" given two different names as two different entities.
In spite the two have the quality of attraction.

Anyhow, the term is a term, as for to describe something .. it may not be essential that the term exactly describes that thing.

What we observe in the universe: the sun and other hot objects attract the objects less than them in heat.
The sun attracts the earth: the sun is very hot, the earth is less than the sun in heat.
The earth attracts the moon which is less than the earth in heat.

So it is logical that the hot object attracts the cold object.

Now, if a cold object like a big asteroid: inert with cold crust and cold core .. even if it is large .. it cannot attract a small object like a small stone .. so the mass may not be the decisive factor of the gravity .. it almost is the heat of the object that will decide its gravity whether it is powerful gravity or weak gravity.

http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_2.htm#Cause_of_the_Gravity_
<quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_2.htm#Cause_of_the_Gravity_>

================================================

The characteristics of the hot object:
It attracts the cold object.
It spins around itself (if it is spherical)
If two hot objects, with equal heat but with different masses, the big one will attract the small object.


While the cold object:
It is attracted to the hot object.
It cannot attract other objects.
It does not spin around itself.

http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/index.htm
<quran-ayat.com/universe/index.htm>
 
Last edited:

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Beavis and Butthead over here.
How you doing Johnney?
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Ah Gravety...
:)
Once you are down, you are down for good.

Now that's attraction.
(unless an archaeologist comes around at some point, and does a little raise the dead type schtick...lol...anti gravety has been here for some time...who knew?)
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Gravity is a side effect of the energy needed to push objects forward in time.

The bigger the object the more energy it takes to push it forward in time.

If it takes 100000000000000 billion energy to push earth forward in time and it takes 1000 energy to push a human forward in time. It is the difference in that energy needed to push both objects forward in time that creates gravity for the smaller object towards the bigger one

The only reason they can't model it is because they don't understand how it works.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
So they don't understand how it works .. of course with exception of some genius guys here. :laughing6:

[youtube]t5h0C6cIypc[/youtube]​

I see the equations in my head. Ive told you guys several times already.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
The reply is not to you, but to Jonnnny. :laughing6:

Although I know your head is full of equations.

Hard for johnnny or anyone, for that fact, to know that since you are quoting me in you're post.
 

Johnnny

Frontiersman
Jun 8, 2007
9,388
124
63
Third rock from the Sun
Best educational tool for drooling retards like you..

Watch it, you might learn something.

Umm no. A book is the best educational tool you idiot

Reading you wouldn't understand.

It's like the difference between writing things out when compared to learning stuff off a computer, you wouldn't get it.