Free trade between provinces? That would be anarchy: Neil Macdonald

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
You say anarchy like it is a bad thing.
Anarchy is a political system, not chaos like the establishment would have you believe.
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
You say anarchy like it is a bad thing.
Anarchy is a political system, not chaos like the establishment would have you believe.

I don't support anarchy, but I do support free trade between jurisdictions.

At least we agree on that.
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
Do you even know what anarchy is?

www.amazon.ca/Worlds-First-Anarchist-Manifesto/dp/187360582X

I know English well enough to relise that different definitions exist. One means somethng similar to chaow and lawlessness, another is an anarchist ideology that opposes the existence of government.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
This has been a problem for decades. Provinces continually put up artificial barriers by passing laws on products to restrict their free passage between provinces. A classic example of this was the brewing industry in which every province insisted that beer sold within the province had to be brewed in that province. The result was ten small breweries, none of which were able to complete with large US breweries when free trade occurred between the US and Canada.
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,509
4,102
113
Edmonton
I remember way back when (in the 80's) when we lived in Manitoba, there was a beer strike. My dad and his wife we coming to visit and had a travel trailer. We asked them to "load up with beer" and we'd pay them when they got to our place. I can't remember how many cases they brought, but wow, we were sure popular! I think we had enough to last us until the strike was over! Dad done did a good job!!


Dix

Oops, they lived here in Alberta (forgot to mention that) LOL
 

JamesBondo

House Member
Mar 3, 2012
4,158
37
48
This has been a problem for decades. Provinces continually put up artificial barriers by passing laws on products to restrict their free passage between provinces. A classic example of this was the brewing industry in which every province insisted that beer sold within the province had to be brewed in that province. The result was ten small breweries, none of which were able to complete with large US breweries when free trade occurred between the US and Canada.
Totally incorrect history. Molson and Labatts sold to all 10 provinces.
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
And Labatts had breweries in every province except PEI, which for obvious reasons didn't enforce that sort of legislation. Molson was sold as an 'import' in limited quantities in NB and NS, if sold at all.
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
And Labatts had breweries in every province except PEI, which for obvious reasons didn't enforce that sort of legislation. Molson was sold as an 'import' in limited quantities in NB and NS, if sold at all.

"Obvious" should never be presumed: Canada's functional literacy rate in either official language among the working-age population hovers at just above 50%. You mean because of its small population, right?
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
"Obvious" should never be presumed: Canada's functional literacy rate in either official language among the working-age population hovers at just above 50%. You mean because of its small population, right?

Hunh? We reed and rite real goodly, most of us.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
exactly,the "small 10 breweries" obviously didn't understand how to expand in a Canadian market

Pretty hard to expand when a brewery is designed to serve only the population of one province. That is why the much larger US breweries, designed to serve 300 million people, were able to absorb Canadian breweries.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,601
14,734
113
Low Earth Orbit
And some provinces had better beer than others using the same label and recipe because of different water.
 

JamesBondo

House Member
Mar 3, 2012
4,158
37
48
Pretty hard to expand when a brewery is designed to serve only the population of one province. That is why the much larger US breweries, designed to serve 300 million people, were able to absorb Canadian breweries.

Wow. You are thick. If you want to sell beer in another province, you had to make a brewery there. Now you dont. Get over it.

And some provinces had better beer than others using the same label and recipe because of different water.

Agreed. Lethbridge Pilsner sucked ass.