Which explains why they are taking over in Britain. Their IQs are higher.
No, they just have a lot more kids. Nothing else to do. Rats breed fast, too.
Nor do their wives have much concern about the children interrupting their careers...
Which explains why they are taking over in Britain. Their IQs are higher.
On the 26th April 1986 the worst nuclear and environmental accident in the history of the world occurred. It happened not under the ideology of the Tories or capitalism. It occurred under the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
I didn't know there was a call for rat breeders. Congrats on your unique job.No, they just have a lot more kids. Nothing else to do. Rats breed fast, too.
Symbolism is everything in politics and nothing better signifies the austerity of May-Cameron-Osborne era than
North Kensington’s ghastly tomb
But political blame spreads right through the Conservative party, with no escape on offer. This goes far beyond the precise shockers – the Tory MPs who mockingly rejected housing regulation; the cuts to funding to councils responsible for retro-fitting fire suppressants; the disregard of coroner’s instructions after the 2009 Lakanal House tragedy; and even the plan to opt out of EU safety regulations. Conservative Kensington and Chelsea council allegedly blocking its ears to tenants’ well-founded anxiety is just the immediate scandal. But this event reaches far deeper, to the very sinews of its party’s policy.
That tower is austerity in ruins. Symbolism is everything in politics and nothing better signifies the May-Cameron-Osborne era that stripped bare the state and its social and physical protection of citizens. The horror of poor people burned alive within feet of the country’s grandest mansions, many of them empty, moth-balled investments, perfectly captures the politics of the last seven years. The Cameron, Osborne, Gove Notting Hill set live just up the road.
From the 40% cuts to local councils, to the bedroom tax and the housing benefit cap banishing people hundreds of miles from family and schools, the people spilling out on to the street, sheltered by churches and mosques, are the unwilling emblems of deliberate Conservative attacks. Just remember how personally people have been abused by George Osborne – those idlers with the blinds down while hard workers set off at dawn. Or Iain Duncan Smith’s: “This is not an easy life any more, chum.” Together with their poisonous press, they hardened public hearts against those struggling and working hard on low incomes: how else could they make this April’s £12bn benefit cuts politically palatable? Here’s the moment public hearts soften and the idea of social security regains its meaning.
George W Bush was similarly exposed by his clueless reaction to Hurricane Katrina, leaving the poor vulnerable to the state’s refusal to invest in flood defences. This government can’t redeem itself, but it can limit the damage by quickly obeying its promise to rehouse every family nearby, one that was only dragged out of ministers reluctantly under fierce questioning by Labour MPs.
The government needs to pay the private rents to rehouse all these families locally. I know of at least one block of luxury flats in Kensington with the lights out permanently in most of them: the council should requisition the housing it needs, with plenty available.
What of rehousing all the other tower block residents now horrified to find their homes too are potential fire-traps?
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...-survivors-finished-austerity-cameron-osborne
Map of empty homes in Kensington with number of days empty
![]()
No, they just have a lot more kids. Nothing else to do. Rats breed fast, too.
Nor do their wives have much concern about the children interrupting their careers...
****ushima has how many reactors with plutonium and Chernobyl had how many reactors and NO plutonium?
wow
You really have no idea about which you speak do you?
They put a lid on Chernobyl and they will never get one on all the reactors at Fukushima
Can't tell the difference between capped and not capped?
LOL
The Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant comprised six separate boiling water reactors
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster
The nuclear disaster has contaminated the world's largest ocean in only five years and it's still leaking 300 tons of radioactive waste every day.
What was the most dangerous nuclear disaster in world history? Most people would say the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in Ukraine, but they’d be wrong. In 2011, an earthquake, believed to be an aftershock of the 2010 earthquake in Chile, created a tsunami that caused a meltdown at the TEPCO nuclear power plant in Fukushima, Japan. Three nuclear reactors melted down and what happened next was the largest release of radiation into the water in the history of the world. Over the next three months, radioactive chemicals, some in even greater quantities than Chernobyl, leaked into the Pacific Ocean. However, the numbers may actually be much higher as Japanese official estimates have been proven by several scientists to be flawed in recent years.
If that weren’t bad enough, Fukushima continues to leak an astounding 300 tons of radioactive waste into the Pacific Ocean every day. It will continue do so indefinitely as the source of the leak cannot be sealed as it is inaccessible to both humans and robots due to extremely high temperatures.
It should come as no surprise, then, that Fukushima has contaminated the entire Pacific Ocean in just five years. This could easily be the worst environmental disaster in human history and it is almost never talked about by politicians, establishment scientists, or the news. It is interesting to note that TEPCO is a subsidiary partner with General Electric (also known as GE), one of the largest companies in the world, which has considerable control over numerous news corporations and politicians alike. Could this possibly explain the lack of news coverage Fukushima has received in the last five years? There is also evidence that GE knew about the poor condition of the Fukushima reactors for decades and did nothing. This led 1,400 Japanese citizens to sue GE for their role in the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
Even if we can’t see the radiation itself, some parts of North America’s western coast have been feeling the effects for years. Not long after Fukushima, fish in Canada began bleeding from their gills, mouths, and eyeballs. This “disease” has been ignored by the government and has decimated native fish populations, including the North Pacific herring. Elsewhere in Western Canada, independent scientists have measured a 300% increase in the level of radiation. According to them, the amount of radiation in the Pacific Ocean is increasing every year. Why is this being ignored by the mainstream media? It might have something to do with the fact that the US and Canadian governments have banned their citizens from talking about Fukushima so “people don’t panic.”
Fukushima Radiation Has Contaminated The Entire Pacific Ocean (And It's Going To Get Worse) | Zero Hedge
It hasn't even gotten started yet.
Chernobyl was One reactor, it's been capped, and there as NO PLUTONIUM.
oh yeah, you get your info from the WAPO
eat salmon
![]()
It's been claimed bodies of 42 people were found in one room at Grenfell Tower
the number 24 is your private hallucinationAre there many 24 storey buildings with wood exteriors?
I'm right, you're senile.You're funny.
Capitalists building free housing? What? That's very anti-capitalist to help people in need, without profiting off their suffering.So you want the capitalists to quit building free housing for the freeloaders? Cut off welfare for commies? Funny how it is always capitalists that the service clubs come to for donations to keep the freeloaders brats from starving to death in the cold and dark.
The paid rents are based on the flats being as modern as sprinklers. Government and industry work hand in hand doing shit like that. Same in Alberta, give the welfare people more money and it goes to rent/utilities/food. There are no other options.I'm right, you're senile.
Capitalists building free housing? What? That's very anti-capitalist to help people in need, without profiting off their suffering.