So from your post, it's clear you don't think we should be giving seniors special treatment?
Canadians voice support for Muslims amid ‘hatred’ unleashed at Liberal MP
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
So from your post, it's clear you don't think we should be giving seniors special treatment?
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." Well in Canada, it's starting to look like Muslims now innit.
The problem with this f*ckheaded motion is it doesn't clearly define Islamophobia. Is simple open criticism of their beliefs a case of "Islamophobia"? Is making fun of their beliefs going to be defined as "Islamophobia"? Is simply saying, "I don't like Muslims" going to be a "hate crime"?
Until the parameters of what constitutes "Islamophobia" are CLEARLY defined, the motion is horse sh*t and anyone who supports it is a moron.
Oh, and thanks for the big red there Flossie. The salt was great on my french fries. Too bad all you could do was neg rep that post because you haven't got the intellectual capacity to try and refute the argument. Well, it's because you can't other than to feebly post and re-post the same, lame wiki link as your pathetic appeal to authority.
Either that or you didn't like being called out for being the bigot you are.
This motion is yet another attempt to try and make it so that refusing the concept of sharia law in Canada will be construed as "Islamophobia".
Let's see if you'll finally answer a direct question. You argue that culture and race are now synonymous, and since religion is cultural, any crimes or so-called crimes against them are hate crimes.
So, that being the case, are Christians a race? Do you think this motion should also protect Christians from hate speech from the likes of Cliffy? Should it also protect the Jews in Canada? They still have to put up with a lot more sh*t than Muslims do.
What about White people? From the period 2012-2014 while hate crimes against Muslims doubled, hate crimes against White people increased by TWO AND A HALF TIMES. Hmmmm, I wonder where the increase came from.
If you have a problem with those stats don't bother crying to me, go tell StatsCan they're wrong. Those are their stats.
Of course there's still one other issue about the numbers. The numbers represent hate crimes reported to the police, not how many were actual hate crimes. Look at the rash of fake hate crimes against Muslims in the US, but I'll guarantee you groups like CAIR and dhimmi wannabes will still be counting them as real incidents for "statistical" purposes. And you know why? Because the retard who heads up CAIR actually said that the fake hate crimes are still the result of "Islamophobia".
Yes that's right folks, if you commit a crime against a Muslim, it's because of "Islamphobia". And if a Muslim fakes a hate crime against themselves, it's because of "Islamophobia".
Sounds suspiciously like the same progtard thinking where you can be a victim while in the process of committing a crime.
By fully legitimizing Islam in Canada, everything that women and the gay community and those who championed them have fought decades for will mean nothing once sharia creep sets in. They are using our own CoRF against us and people like you are too goddam cowardly to call them on it because you like to think you're so tolerant and accepting.
Here's the reality right now as it is. If you're a Christian B&B owner and you refuse to let a gay couple stay as guests, you better be prepared for a sh*t storm from the self-righeous proggies and their media puppet masters.
BUT...if you're a Muslim landlord and discriminate against a disabled person for public housing, public housing that he's been waiting for longer than you owned the apartment building you denied him a public housing unit in because he wasn't Muslim, you get a free pass because of tolerance, acceptance and religious accommodation nonsense.
Now, the last time I checked the laws for Ontario, there was no special proviso allowing Muslims to discriminate against disabled people on religious grounds. Now, if you can show me where such a proviso is written, well you can't so...
You're all just a bunch of gutless cowards. You run to hide your head in the sand after every misdeed done by a Muslim. Then when some misdeed is perpetrated against a Muslim, perceived or genuine it doesn't matter, you're all so quick to whip your heads out of the sand to say something I'm amazed the entire lot of you don't suffer from friggin' whiplash.
The thing is, for the most part Canada is a pretty tolerant and accepting country and that's not necessarily a bad thing. But with those comes trust that is easily misplaced. We also showed as a country that we weren't all that interested in seeing religion play much of an official role in Canada when the Christian Heritage Party of Canada was roundly rejected, twice. To the point they couldn't even maintain official party status. I hope Canadians are still that smart when it comes to Islam and Muslims.
The problem with this f*ckheaded motion is it doesn't clearly define Islamophobia. Is simple open criticism of their beliefs a case of "Islamophobia"? Is making fun of their beliefs going to be defined as "Islamophobia"? Is simply saying, "I don't like Muslims" going to be a "hate crime"?
Until the parameters of what constitutes "Islamophobia" are CLEARLY defined, the motion is horse sh*t and anyone who supports it is a moron.
Oh, and thanks for the big red there Flossie. The salt was great on my french fries. Too bad all you could do was neg rep that post because you haven't got the intellectual capacity to try and refute the argument. Well, it's because you can't other than to feebly post and re-post the same, lame wiki link as your pathetic appeal to authority.
Either that or you didn't like being called out for being the bigot you are.
This motion is yet another attempt to try and make it so that refusing the concept of sharia law in Canada will be construed as "Islamophobia".
Let's see if you'll finally answer a direct question. You argue that culture and race are now synonymous, and since religion is cultural, any crimes or so-called crimes against them are hate crimes.
So, that being the case, are Christians a race? Do you think this motion should also protect Christians from hate speech from the likes of Cliffy? Should it also protect the Jews in Canada? They still have to put up with a lot more sh*t than Muslims do.
What about White people? From the period 2012-2014 while hate crimes against Muslims doubled, hate crimes against White people increased by TWO AND A HALF TIMES. Hmmmm, I wonder where the increase came from.
If you have a problem with those stats don't bother crying to me, go tell StatsCan they're wrong. Those are their stats.
Of course there's still one other issue about the numbers. The numbers represent hate crimes reported to the police, not how many were actual hate crimes. Look at the rash of fake hate crimes against Muslims in the US, but I'll guarantee you groups like CAIR and dhimmi wannabes will still be counting them as real incidents for "statistical" purposes. And you know why? Because the retard who heads up CAIR actually said that the fake hate crimes are still the result of "Islamophobia".
Yes that's right folks, if you commit a crime against a Muslim, it's because of "Islamphobia". And if a Muslim fakes a hate crime against themselves, it's because of "Islamophobia".
Sounds suspiciously like the same progtard thinking where you can be a victim while in the process of committing a crime.
By fully legitimizing Islam in Canada, everything that women and the gay community and those who championed them have fought decades for will mean nothing once sharia creep sets in. They are using our own CoRF against us and people like you are too goddam cowardly to call them on it because you like to think you're so tolerant and accepting.
Here's the reality right now as it is. If you're a Christian B&B owner and you refuse to let a gay couple stay as guests, you better be prepared for a sh*t storm from the self-righeous proggies and their media puppet masters.
BUT...if you're a Muslim landlord and discriminate against a disabled person for public housing, public housing that he's been waiting for longer than you owned the apartment building you denied him a public housing unit in because he wasn't Muslim, you get a free pass because of tolerance, acceptance and religious accommodation nonsense.
Now, the last time I checked the laws for Ontario, there was no special proviso allowing Muslims to discriminate against disabled people on religious grounds. Now, if you can show me where such a proviso is written, well you can't so...
You're all just a bunch of gutless cowards. You run to hide your head in the sand after every misdeed done by a Muslim. Then when some misdeed is perpetrated against a Muslim, perceived or genuine it doesn't matter, you're all so quick to whip your heads out of the sand to say something I'm amazed the entire lot of you don't suffer from friggin' whiplash.
The thing is, for the most part Canada is a pretty tolerant and accepting country and that's not necessarily a bad thing. But with those comes trust that is easily misplaced. We also showed as a country that we weren't all that interested in seeing religion play much of an official role in Canada when the Christian Heritage Party of Canada was roundly rejected, twice. To the point they couldn't even maintain official party status. I hope Canadians are still that smart when it comes to Islam and Muslims.
The real question is. How many mentally ill people are we causing by denying our natural genetic insticts mentalflake?
I know you're a big fan of this social reprogramming brainwashing. How many mentaly ill people is acceptable in you're crusade?
Dose the greater good justify a whole generation of mentally ill humans that have repressed natural genetic instinct syndrome?
See this is my problem with progressives. They blindly charge into anything without the slightest thought on the consequences of their actions. This is why i no longer am a progressive myself. In my experience they always cause as much harm in there crusades as what good comes out of them.
I know you're a big fan of this social reprogramming brainwashing. How many mentaly ill people is acceptable in you're crusade?
Dose the greater good justify a whole generation of mentally ill humans that have repressed natural genetic instinct syndrome?
See this is my problem with progressives. They blindly charge into anything without the slightest thought on the consequences of their actions. This is why i no longer am a progressive myself. In my experience they always cause as much harm in there crusades as what good comes out of them.
If ever there would have been a motion in our House of Common that might have made sense, it would have been a motion launched to fully study why the likes of Mr. Gharbi hated woman enough to be able to walk into a school in Montreal and massacre 14 of them in their classroom, etc. The public would have been interested in finding out the results of such a study, and psychiatrists could have evaluated how such hatred can escalate to extreme violence. Supposedly this one was anti-feminist, really! I would say he was just a woman abuser, period !! At the time, the government of the day decided to not hold a public inquiry since they felt it might lead to antifeminist violence, I guess this current government did not see the similarities between the two mass shootings, so decided to showcasing the Mosques massacre. Bissonnette was obviously a violent psychopath. I'm sure there is an increase in Islamophobia, but for woman there is no increase, it's a constant.
This is the start....
Bring in Sharia rules one by one...
Which one is next...
SHARIA LAW ? LIST OF KEY RULES ? What Is Sharia Law?
Now I must reinforce my coffee table to be safer.....
Are you saying that the mosque shooter was a Muslim or that Muslims drove him to shooting Muslims and that he's totally innocent as a result?
Have you not read the Book of Leviticus?
Read the Kitab-i-Aqdas. Broader still.
Islam is not the only religion with a broad set of laws that regulate government and private behaviour. That's common to a number of religions including the Baha'i Faith and even the Christian faith to a degree. One thing they all teach in common though is respect for even those secular laws with which they disagree. This means that Muslims view the public application of Shari'a as merely aspirational in a non-Muslim state as is their freedom to do in a free society.
Use your head dumbo, I'm saying that if Muslims were good upstanding citizens, didn't commit terror acts against Canadians and other people in the world, integrated well in Canada just like other ethnic groups etc etc, then this dude would have never been inspired to do what he did.
The world would be a pretty peaceful place today if it weren't for the wat raging Muslims.
***war raging**
Anti-Islamophobia motion offers a chance to take a stand against hatred. Why quibble over semantics?
https://www.google.ca/amp/www.cbc.ca/amp/1.3988771?client=safari
Oh oh, I know the answer to this one!
It's because they're racist.
https://www.google.ca/amp/www.cbc.ca/amp/1.3988771?client=safari
Oh oh, I know the answer to this one!
It's because they're racist.
You're saying that the victims of the mosque shooter were terrorists?
Then I'm racist I guess.
I oppose official bilingualism because it unjustly discriminates in favour of members of Canada's two most advantaged ethnic and linguistic communities. I oppose the separate school system because it unjustly discriminates in favour of members of Canada's two most advantaged ethnic and religious communities.
So why would I now support a motion that again gives preference to members of a particular religious community?
I thought it was "the Muzzies are comin'. The Muzzies are comin'."
"Muslim" might be too difficult for some to pronounce.
there are plenty of people that chose Canada, to apply to come here. done it by the book. and then some young able-body male jumps ahead because 'syria' or some such horsesh!t? nope.
I don't care what religion these yahoos practice or don't. I don't care what hue their skin might be.
same applies here as anywhere else in my opinion...jump the queue, then fukk you.
I don't care what religion these yahoos practice or don't. I don't care what hue their skin might be.
same applies here as anywhere else in my opinion...jump the queue, then fukk you.
So because Muslims are the main victims of religious prejudice in Canada now, we should write a law just for them so that when a bunch of christians get slaughtered one day, we could write a new law for them and then when Jews get slaughtered years later, we could again write a new law for them? Seems like a lot of work. Isn't it more efficient to just cover all eventualities in one single neutrally-worded motion?
This motion was not spurred on by queue jumpers. It was spurred on by a Quebec gunman. haven't been following the news lately I take it?