this may be something to watch kids.
FAKE NEWSFLOW: Are The NY Times, Guardian, And WaPo Buying Clicks? China Jumps From Trickle To Half Of All Traffic In Two Months
Last week the Failing New York Times published an article crediting Donald Trump and the controversial election for “more subscribers in three months than all of 2015,” claiming the addition of 276,000 new “digital-only” customers. The beleaguered publication owned by Mexican Billionaire Carlos Slim is doing so well in fact that they are vacating 8 floors of their New York headquarters to generate “significant rental revenue,” as well as pushing lame Twitter ads offering 40% off subscriptions which state things like “Truth. It’s vital to democracy” and “The best independent journalism.”
While subscriber count may have allegedly increased, website traffic really didn’t start picking up until the first week in December. The Washington Post and The Guardian (UK) saw similar traffic trends around the same time, in stark contrast to most of their peers. A quick before-and-after illustrates the dramatic pickup in visitors:
Rankings at the beginning of December, 2016:
Rankings as of February 8th, 2017:
Traffic begins to pick up significantly around the middle of December for all three. Here’s a look at the overall picture compared to various other news outlets:
lots more
FAKE NEWSFLOW: Are The NY Times, Guardian, And WaPo Buying Clicks? China Jumps From Trickle To Half Of All Traffic In Two Months – ZeroPointNow
That's atleast 30-40milion UNIQUE views from China.
Less than 10million people in China speak English.
Oh, and (((New York Times))) is also banned in China.
Is it DDOS getting registered? No
Are Chinese just watching our news? No, no chineybump for CNN.com or Foxnews.com ->
Cnn.com Traffic, Demographics and Competitors - Alexa
Are the money changers behind this? Yes
/pol/ - FAKE NEWS FAKE VIEWS | Thread III - Politically Incorrect - 4chan
FAKE NEWSFLOW: Are The NY Times, Guardian, And WaPo Buying Clicks? China Jumps From Trickle To Half Of All Traffic In Two Months
Last week the Failing New York Times published an article crediting Donald Trump and the controversial election for “more subscribers in three months than all of 2015,” claiming the addition of 276,000 new “digital-only” customers. The beleaguered publication owned by Mexican Billionaire Carlos Slim is doing so well in fact that they are vacating 8 floors of their New York headquarters to generate “significant rental revenue,” as well as pushing lame Twitter ads offering 40% off subscriptions which state things like “Truth. It’s vital to democracy” and “The best independent journalism.”
While subscriber count may have allegedly increased, website traffic really didn’t start picking up until the first week in December. The Washington Post and The Guardian (UK) saw similar traffic trends around the same time, in stark contrast to most of their peers. A quick before-and-after illustrates the dramatic pickup in visitors:
Rankings at the beginning of December, 2016:
Rankings as of February 8th, 2017:
Traffic begins to pick up significantly around the middle of December for all three. Here’s a look at the overall picture compared to various other news outlets:
lots more
FAKE NEWSFLOW: Are The NY Times, Guardian, And WaPo Buying Clicks? China Jumps From Trickle To Half Of All Traffic In Two Months – ZeroPointNow
That's atleast 30-40milion UNIQUE views from China.
Less than 10million people in China speak English.
Oh, and (((New York Times))) is also banned in China.
Is it DDOS getting registered? No
Are Chinese just watching our news? No, no chineybump for CNN.com or Foxnews.com ->
Cnn.com Traffic, Demographics and Competitors - Alexa
Are the money changers behind this? Yes
/pol/ - FAKE NEWS FAKE VIEWS | Thread III - Politically Incorrect - 4chan
