I know it seems a bit taboo to mention this, but the argument towards female equality always seems to go back to how great men have had it for centuries and how men have oppressed women for so long.
Some argue that it's payback time and that all men owe them something despite most of their examples existing far in the past by generations long ago, or specifically, has had nothing to do with their own direct lives and were things they didn't suffer. They're part of the gender and because of that, they're owed compensation like being hired over a man due to filling a male/female quota despite the male possibly being more qualified for the job.
Then you have the argument that they aren't getting paid as much as their male counterparts... But how true is that really? Are they actually good at their job? Do they do their job as good as the next person? Do they put in the same hours? How reliable are they and how many sick days do they take off??
This of course applies to men as well.... If this guy is just putting in what he needs to for his job and doesn't actually strive to help out more vs. the lady over there who does over time and produces better work, then if I was the employer, she would get the raise over the other guy.... But if it was the other way around and the guy was doing the better job, he'd get the raise. But then if she starts b*tching and complaining about her not getting the raise because she's female, we can easily see what kind of slippery slope that turns out to be.
I get pressured to give it to her instead so I don't come out as discriminating against females, the guy who was doing the better job gets p*ssed off that his efforts went unnoticed while the slacker got a raise due to playing the gender card, and then they leave to work somewhere else that would better recognise their work, and I'm stuck paying more for someone who does a sh*tier job.
All these centuries that have gone by about how men have had it good while women were oppressed..... If men and women were really equal, Then why did they let themselves be so oppressed? Why didn't it go the other way? Why didn't women oppress men early on?
All things being equal, history could have gone the other way, but it didn't. Was it because men are stronger and women are weaker? I doubt it because even in the Viking era, women fought along side men. Men used strength and if the woman lacked strength they had their speed and agility.
Regardless the past is the past and the men today who try to treat everyone equal don't deserve punishment or inequality simply because others in the past did wrong things.
That's like me going to jail for a crime my great grandfather did.
Equality exists... It just needs to be properly enforced. For those who discriminate they should be properly punished. Continual fighting and villainizing men to get more out of the situation is just BS.
:thumbright::thumbright: