Let's pick on Hillary (Her Thighness)

davesmom

Council Member
Oct 11, 2015
2,084
0
36
Southern Ontario
I pick on Hillary for scaring Americans that it would be dangerous if Donald Trump had his finger on the 'red' button to start a nuclear war.
Don't most Americans know that a President alone cannot set off a nuclear attack? Aren't there codes and buttons that have to also be used by other officials? Things have changed since the first and only nuclear attack was launched on Japan.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,888
126
63
If Hillary was not a woman, she would have been elected President years ago, her education, years at sitting at the oval table, her strength, the roles she's played, there is no way she would have been left behind, she was wayyyyyy more qualified than half the pinheads she's had to tolerate over the years.
What has she actually done besides set the Middle East on fire during her tenure as SOS?
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
I pick on Hillary for scaring Americans that it would be dangerous if Donald Trump had his finger on the 'red' button to start a nuclear war.
Don't most Americans know that a President alone cannot set off a nuclear attack? Aren't there codes and buttons that have to also be used by other officials? Things have changed since the first and only nuclear attack was launched on Japan.


I agree 90%, there was a second attach on Japan 3 days later at Nagasaki.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Texas’s Most Prominent Conservative Newspaper Endorses Hillary Over Trump



The Houston Chronicle, Texas’ largest newspaper, endorsed Hillary Clinton for president yesterday, becoming one of the first major newspapers to endorse a candidate. As the editorial board itself said, this early endorsement came because the choice in the election this year is about “something much more basic than party preference,” namely “the most basic notions of competence and capability.”

The paper’s board reiterated President Obama’s belief that Clinton would be “the most qualified person in years to serve as president,” and announced its support for her on issues ranging from immigration to healthcare and energy policy, all of which are of crucial importance to Houston and to Texas in general. As they note, “there’s no comparison in terms of thoughtfulness, thoroughness, and practicality” between Clinton’s expert-informed policies and Trump’s “paper-thin, bumper-sticker proposals.”

Most importantly, however, the Chronicle realizes better than most the degree to which this country’s most basic and foundational principles are at stake in this most crucial of elections. “Whether or not voters like her personally,” the editorial board writes, “is almost irrelevant at this moment of reckoning” between a hopeful vision of an open, inclusive, progressive American society and a walled-off, oppressive, inward-facing dystopia. The Chronicle goes on to mercilessly and rightfully castigate the GOP nominee:

Any one of Trump’s less-than-sterling qualities – his erratic temperament, his dodgy business practices, his racism, his Putin-like strongman inclinations and faux-populist demagoguery, his contempt for the rule of law, his ignorance – is enough to be disqualifying. His convention-speech comment, “I alone can fix it,” should make every American shudder. He is, we believe, a danger to the Republic.

As Clinton herself has acknowledged, she is not the best campaigner and has made many mistakes in her career, but the enormity of the actual political choice facing the nation should make it a moral imperative for every decent American to support her.

The Chronicle’s editorial marks one of the first major newspaper endorsements of this election cycle, but many more are sure to follow for Clinton given the inevitable ability of informed observers to recognize her obvious superiority to Trump. It is also significant that Texas’ premier newspaper should endorse the Democratic candidate. Although the city of Houston is substantially more liberal than the state as a whole, the Chronicle is no liberal rag; it endorsed Mitt Romney in 2012 and Hillary is only the third Democratic candidate ever to be endorsed by the paper. Indeed despite Texas’ notorious conservatism, its rising Hispanic population and the increasingly cosmopolitan nature of cities like Houston and Dallas has been pushing the state’s politics to the left. A competitive race in the state does not seem totally out of the realm of possibility, and the Chronicle’s endorsement can only help Clinton’s chances there.



Texas's Most Prominent Conservative Newspaper Endorses Hillary Over Trump
 

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
Texas’s Most Prominent Conservative Newspaper Endorses Hillary Over Trump


Texas's Most Prominent Conservative Newspaper Endorses Hillary Over Trump


its good to read that clearer heads do prevail, Clinton is the obvious choice in this election, and hopefully others
follow. this particular election is very very important, and the wrong choice could severely hurt the
country, these citizens must be cared for in a democratic manner, not a dictatorial manner.

if the election does elect Clinton, then the republicans can dispose of trump, clean the slate and begin
all over and prepare for 4 years down the road.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,888
126
63
Texas’s Most Prominent Conservative Newspaper Endorses Hillary Over Trump



The Houston Chronicle, Texas’ largest newspaper, endorsed Hillary Clinton for president yesterday, becoming one of the first major newspapers to endorse a candidate. As the editorial board itself said, this early endorsement came because the choice in the election this year is about “something much more basic than party preference,” namely “the most basic notions of competence and capability.”

The paper’s board reiterated President Obama’s belief that Clinton would be “the most qualified person in years to serve as president,” and announced its support for her on issues ranging from immigration to healthcare and energy policy, all of which are of crucial importance to Houston and to Texas in general. As they note, “there’s no comparison in terms of thoughtfulness, thoroughness, and practicality” between Clinton’s expert-informed policies and Trump’s “paper-thin, bumper-sticker proposals.”

Most importantly, however, the Chronicle realizes better than most the degree to which this country’s most basic and foundational principles are at stake in this most crucial of elections. “Whether or not voters like her personally,” the editorial board writes, “is almost irrelevant at this moment of reckoning” between a hopeful vision of an open, inclusive, progressive American society and a walled-off, oppressive, inward-facing dystopia. The Chronicle goes on to mercilessly and rightfully castigate the GOP nominee:

Any one of Trump’s less-than-sterling qualities – his erratic temperament, his dodgy business practices, his racism, his Putin-like strongman inclinations and faux-populist demagoguery, his contempt for the rule of law, his ignorance – is enough to be disqualifying. His convention-speech comment, “I alone can fix it,” should make every American shudder. He is, we believe, a danger to the Republic.

As Clinton herself has acknowledged, she is not the best campaigner and has made many mistakes in her career, but the enormity of the actual political choice facing the nation should make it a moral imperative for every decent American to support her.

The Chronicle’s editorial marks one of the first major newspaper endorsements of this election cycle, but many more are sure to follow for Clinton given the inevitable ability of informed observers to recognize her obvious superiority to Trump. It is also significant that Texas’ premier newspaper should endorse the Democratic candidate. Although the city of Houston is substantially more liberal than the state as a whole, the Chronicle is no liberal rag; it endorsed Mitt Romney in 2012 and Hillary is only the third Democratic candidate ever to be endorsed by the paper. Indeed despite Texas’ notorious conservatism, its rising Hispanic population and the increasingly cosmopolitan nature of cities like Houston and Dallas has been pushing the state’s politics to the left. A competitive race in the state does not seem totally out of the realm of possibility, and the Chronicle’s endorsement can only help Clinton’s chances there.



Texas's Most Prominent Conservative Newspaper Endorses Hillary Over Trump
Anything is conservative compared to a radical left web site.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
Jubal E. Harshaw ‏@alimhaider

Every time I hear someone say “public service,” I feel like vomiting.

 

Ludlow

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 7, 2014
13,588
0
36
wherever i sit down my ars