trudeau crossed the floor and pushed aside NDP MPs

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
Perhaps Five Paradox's post has injected a little sense into this thread! :)

Sure. According to a liberal we don't need any debate on anything. Heck we might as well save a ton of money and not bother sending any opposition MPs to Ottawa. Just let the majority govt do whatever whenever. Perfect sense.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
The Harper government had to write the book on how to proceed when it was in power, the same way the liberals have to write the procedures it wants to opperate under now.

The government operated the way it did because the conservatives choose to opperate in that way. They weren't forced to opperate like that. :lol:

**** your as stupid as a two by four PoliticalTwit. :lol:
 

JamesBondo

House Member
Mar 3, 2012
4,158
37
48
Sure. According to a liberal we don't need any debate on anything. Heck we might as well save a ton of money and not bother sending any opposition MPs to Ottawa. Just let the majority govt do whatever whenever. Perfect sense.
Clearly, you need a majority gov that is afraid to govern
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
Clearly, you need a majority gov that is afraid to govern

My preference would be a minority govt all the time. It prevents what is usually 50% or more of the population having no say and forces the parties to compromise and work together.

The Harper government had to write the book on how to proceed when it was in power, the same way the liberals have to write the procedures it wants to opperate under now.

The government operated the way it did because the conservatives choose to opperate in that way. They weren't forced to opperate like that. :lol:

**** your as stupid as a two by four PoliticalTwit. :lol:
Get a brain, take some grammar and spelling lessons and stop being an idiot and you might end your reign as the laughing stock of of this forum.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
How to govern a government must be right next to the how a proof is a proof when it is proven section of the text book.

Actually I think Trudeau wants to adopt a style of government similar to what his father had ;)

With similar processes and procedures. For sentimental value.

My preference would be a minority govt all the time. It prevents what is usually 50% or more of the population having no say and forces the parties to compromise and work together.


Get a brain, take some grammar and spelling lessons and stop being an idiot and you might end your reign as the laughing stock of of this forum.

I'll be arround to point out your stupidity every time,
since you apparently have a IQ of 168 :lol: boy likes to exaggerate ;)

Bear handed me the job ;)
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Get your facts straight, the board's #2 troll, ES, outed him with a thread about how insane a person is after they hand out so may reds. Carry on with your delusion.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Actually I think Trudeau wants to adopt a style of government similar to what his father had ;)

With similar processes and procedures. For sentimental value.


But w/o the propensity to spend money we ain't got, I would hope. We don't need another $400 billion debt load, which it looks like he's headed for I think. He may just be a little too overwhelmed with his perception of his own self importance. Hopefully Elbow Gate has softened that a smidgen! :)
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
The only job you might get around here is Village Idiot. Then again you might be over-qualified as an idiot

Not when your arround that's for sure :lol: With your 168 IQ ;)

It's ok I'll explain everything for you, like a small child ;)

maybe you can have a other hissy fit and get all homophobe on us again :lol:
 

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
Sure. According to a liberal we don't need any debate on anything. Heck we might as well save a ton of money and not bother sending any opposition MPs to Ottawa. Just let the majority govt do whatever whenever. Perfect sense.

Yeah... not quite what I said.

I believe that it is fair and reasonable for a government to invoke time allocation on a bill that must be passed by a due date handed down by the Supreme Court of Canada. If the Conservatives and the New Democrats are going to attempt to intentionally defy the Supreme Court (as the Tories, we know at least, are wont to do) then it is up to the executive branch of government to use the time allocation powers that the House itself, by majority vote, has authorized.

Let us remember that the government proposed that there be an entire day of debate on the report stage of the bill (i.e., on the amendments proposed by the legislative committee); an entire day of debate on the third reading stage of the bill; and that the bill must still pass all stages of debate in the Honourable the Senate. Any amendments made in the senate to the bill (and there will be amendments) would also have been open to debate in the Commons.

The desire to speed up the passage of the bill, in areas where the government has that prerogative to ask, and where the Commons accepts, is entirely reasonable in this context. Let us recall that if our Parliament has not enacted Bill C-14 within the next two weeks, then we have no in-force legislation the books respecting physician-assisted dying.