Duffy found not guilty of charges of fraud, breach of trust

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
I asked you for an explanation of what it means.

Your explanation is that you were the author of the term.

The term has been used correctly many times before and you are not the author of the term.

Therefore, what you stated did not make any logical sense.


Do I really have to be this pedantic or are you seriously this dumb?
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
I asked you for an explanation of what it means.

Your explanation is that you were the author of the term.

The term has been used correctly many times before and you are not the author of the term.

Therefore, what you stated did not make any logical sense.


Do I really have to be this pedantic or are you seriously this dumb?

Butt hurt looks a little like this post that you posted here. This is obviously someone who is insulted :lol:
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Not at all.

I just find it tedious having to consistently explain the obvious to you.
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
gotta be one of the saltiest threads in the history of CC. :lol:


Oh I agree. I can only imagine how salty they all are now........


 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Neither do any of your claims. That is what he is trying to tell you.

Floss wants to stimulate supply of renewable energy products. To create demand :lol:

Social guilt for the environment dose not equate demand for renewable energy products.

That's the two fallacies I've been able to analyze in his head.

He has really no understanding of free markets.

He has no understanding that social guilt is not a indication of demand for a product.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
It “strains credulity” to think former prime minister Stephen Harper was unaware that his inner circle was working to cover up Sen. Mike Duffy’s controversial $90,000 payment, Duffy’s lawyer says.

In the wake of Duffy’s resounding acquittal last week, which included multiple scathing critiques of the former Prime Minister’s Office, Duffy’s lawyer, Donald Bayne, sat down with CTV’s Question Period for a candid one-on-one interview.

'Strains credulity' to think Harper unaware during Senate scandal, Duffy's lawyer says | CTV News
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
It “strains credulity” to think former prime minister Stephen Harper was unaware that his inner circle was working to cover up Sen. Mike Duffy’s controversial $90,000 payment, Duffy’s lawyer says.

In the wake of Duffy’s resounding acquittal last week, which included multiple scathing critiques of the former Prime Minister’s Office, Duffy’s lawyer, Donald Bayne, sat down with CTV’s Question Period for a candid one-on-one interview.

'Strains credulity' to think Harper unaware during Senate scandal, Duffy's lawyer says | CTV News

As it was to cover up something that wasn't wrong, and only a attempt to cover up a "public perceived" wrong, it's really just a big none issue. :lol:
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
In the real world, the fact that the PMO went to such lengths to cover up this 'non issue' has become the issue.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
In the real world, the fact that the PMO went to such lengths to cover up this 'non issue' has become the issue.

So who is at fault? Harper trying to over react to the NDP political Spin creating a false perceived wrong doing by the conservatives in the senate?
Or the over reaction of NDP political attack to create a perceived wrong where there were none?

It's politics. Things get nasty. I don't blame the NDP for playing nasty politics. Why blame the conservatives of trying to damage control from attacks of nasty politics?

Nasty politics is a fact of life for these folks. It should come as no surprise, damage control is part of that game.

We can arguably say, Baseless NDP political attacks is the root cause of all this BS. The NDP fabricated a scandal when there was none. "Nasty politics"
 

arob

Nominee Member
A great story , a great victory for a now legendary Canadian senator. It's just too bad there aren't more consequences for the Cons - i..e. they have to pay Duffy's legal fees from their coffers and wont be able to run their full page ads in the next election , or something. . . But in four years time it will all be forgotten and people will be pretty sick of Justine too by then I'm sure...