My daughter dosn't smoke is in perfect health trim and strong as an ox and she's really really smart. Like I said earlier it gets down to the money and virtually everyones slavery to its power. There's also the element of logic that dosn't get the play it should. Look at the drug profits and tell me there isn't sound reason to believe that money trumps health and quality and ethics.
for instance Twila,the article below is about the financial sector, the play is the same in every sector, corruption as far as the eyes can see, we're surrounded by it.
Feb 11 11:06
Central Banks Are Trojan Horses, Looting Their Host Nations
A Nobel prize winning economist, former chief economist and senior vice president of the World Bank, and chairman of the President’s council of economic advisers (Joseph Stiglitz) says that the International Monetary Fund and World Bank loan money to third world countries as a way to force them to open up their markets and resources for looting by the West.
Do central banks do something similar?
Economics professor Richard Werner – who created the concept of quantitative easing – has documented that central banks intentionally impoverish their host countries to justify economic and legal changes which allow looting by foreign interests.
The Wonderland Matrix: Realm of the Charlatan Experts
Submitted by IWB, on February 11th, 2016
hare
by
Jeff Nielson
By now; regular readers are aware of a startling admission from the mainstream media. It came in the form of a
video presentation from The Economist, titled
The World in 2016.
A twenty year academic study found that when it comes to predictions, so-called experts are as accurate as dart-throwing chimps.
Here it is important to note that forecasting (in one form or another) represents most of what these “experts” do, in terms of their interaction with the general public. Typically, the mainstream media trots out one of these charlatans after some major event, or important statistical release, and asks “how will this affect us?” In other words, what comes next?
Now we know that, for at least the last twenty years, every time one of these charlatans opens his/her mouth to tell us what comes next, all that comes out is gibberish. We would literally get just as good an answer from a chimp.
This brings us to our second major point of analysis. It is these same charlatan experts whom the mainstream media showcases, in order to validate the “news” they feed to us. No matter how absurd or improbable are the events being related, there is always one or more charlatan experts standing ready to rubber-stamp the mainstream media’s propaganda. Now we know that this rubber-stamp of approval from these charlatan experts is worth no more than
a U.S. dollar.
The propaganda of the mainstream media now stands bare. Their precious “experts” who legitimize all of this propaganda have been exposed as nothing more than vacuous wind-bags. The “news” fed to us by the Corporate media must now be validated by some other means, or it loses any legitimacy. It becomes nothing but unsubstantiated words.
The most obvious manner in which the mainstream media could legitimize its “news” would be to begin to provide
real, detailed explanations of events and statistics. That’s called journalism. But that’s not what we get. What we get are two-minute sound-bites (or less). A mainstream talking-head provides the barest summary of the facts,
states a conclusion, and then has some charlatan expert standing at his side to rubber-stamp that conclusion.
We now know that rubber-stamp is totally worthless. Thus what we are really getting in our “news” is some media mouthpiece
