Canada’s bombing mission over by Feb. 22

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
I already stated ISIL is not only in Syria and they are indeed terrorists.

You won't eradicate these splintered groups and none of the measures you suggest would actually reduce their influence.

All we can do is assist the opposing forces (and make certain they are actually opposing forces) and continue to evolve the regimes in the middle east through diplomacy over decades.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
I can quote the earlier post but it would be easier if you could learn to read.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
True, but Bear also has naive assumptions like ISIS will be eradicated.


Trudeau’s ISIS policy gets an assist from Obama—and Harper

The Prime Minister didn’t just escape harm inflicted by a jilted ally (though he still must remain nervous about domestic Canadian political reaction, which naturally will parse these things differently from the way any foreign power does). He received a positive boost from a choreographed succession of American political figures. It was objectively harder for the Conservative Opposition to criticize Trudeau at the end of the day than it had been at the beginning.

First up was Peter Cook, the Pentagon spokesman and stand-in for Defence Secretary Ashton Carter, who has been portrayed as the bad cop to Secretary of State John Kerry’s Trudeau-hugging good-cop softie on the Canada file. What’s significant is that Cook didn’t just shrug and accept Trudeau’s training-and-relief-but-no-fighters stance, he flagged it as a model for other U.S. allies to emulate. “The Canadian announcement is the kind of response the secretary’s been looking for from coalition members,” Cook said at the daily Pentagon briefing, “as the United States and coalition partners push to accelerate the campaign against ISIL.”

After that, remarks from U.S. ambassador Bruce Heyman (“I was pleased“) and, in a paraphrased readout of a phone conversation with Trudeau, from Obama himself (“The President welcomed Canada’s current and new contributions“) were gravy.

Justin Trudeau's ISIS policy gets an assist from Obama—and Harper
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
It appears you need to dumb down the conversation for some.
We can do that for you if you like. But I doubt you'd be able to participate anyway.

Poor Bear and his naive assumptions that ISIS will be eradicated.
I see you can't address my post. I could dumb it down for you, but since you think ISIL is merely a terrorist organization, like a silly conbot, you likely still wouldn't be able to participate in any meaningful way.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
True, but Bear also has naive assumptions like ISIS will be eradicated.


Trudeau’s ISIS policy gets an assist from Obama—and Harper

The Prime Minister didn’t just escape harm inflicted by a jilted ally (though he still must remain nervous about domestic Canadian political reaction, which naturally will parse these things differently from the way any foreign power does). He received a positive boost from a choreographed succession of American political figures. It was objectively harder for the Conservative Opposition to criticize Trudeau at the end of the day than it had been at the beginning.

First up was Peter Cook, the Pentagon spokesman and stand-in for Defence Secretary Ashton Carter, who has been portrayed as the bad cop to Secretary of State John Kerry’s Trudeau-hugging good-cop softie on the Canada file. What’s significant is that Cook didn’t just shrug and accept Trudeau’s training-and-relief-but-no-fighters stance, he flagged it as a model for other U.S. allies to emulate. “The Canadian announcement is the kind of response the secretary’s been looking for from coalition members,” Cook said at the daily Pentagon briefing, “as the United States and coalition partners push to accelerate the campaign against ISIL.”

After that, remarks from U.S. ambassador Bruce Heyman (“I was pleased“) and, in a paraphrased readout of a phone conversation with Trudeau, from Obama himself (“The President welcomed Canada’s current and new contributions“) were gravy.

Justin Trudeau's ISIS policy gets an assist from Obama—and Harper

Well as long as the Pentagon approves, what can go wrong?


There's nothing like anti-terrorism to build national unity.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
We can do that for you if you like. But I doubt you'd be able to participate anyway.

I see you can't address my post. I could dumb it down for you, but since you think ISIL is merely a terrorist organization, like a silly conbot, you likely still wouldn't be able to participate in any meaningful way.

Feel free to expand however you like.

ISIS will still be here when you get back.

Awaiting ISIS eradication......
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Feel free to expand however you like.

ISIS will still be here when you get back.
You can play all the silly games you want, or you could just address my post.

Just point out which part you don't understand and I'll try and dumb it down for you.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
You can play all the silly games you want, or you could just address my post.

Just point out which part you don't understand and I'll try and dumb it down for you.

It gets a bit annoying to have to constantly remind you to read, but clearly my post was a response to yours so you should be able to remember what you've just written. Otherwise, just read the post you made just before mine.

This is how dialogue normally works.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
It gets a bit annoying to have to constantly remind you to read, but clearly my post was a response to yours so you should be able to remember what you've just written. Otherwise, just read the post you made just before mine.


Quote where he said that that ISIS "WILL" be eradicated. If you can't, then it's time to shut the fu ck up.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
It gets a bit annoying to have to constantly remind you to read, but clearly my post was a response to yours so you should be able to remember what you've just written. Otherwise, just read the post you made just before mine.

This is how dialogue normally works.
Look, I get it, you feel silly having shot your mouth off about something you have little understanding.

I don't mind helping you out. Just quote whatever it is you're having difficulty with.

Quote where he said that that ISIS "WILL" be eradicated. If you can't, then it's time to shut the fu ck up.
Shush you. Making things up is how Flossy tries to look smart.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Quote where he said that that ISIS "WILL" be eradicated. If you can't, then it's time to shut the fu ck up.

Obviously he didn't have to say will for it to be a naive sentiment.

Obviously.


Just the fact that anyone wants them to be eradicated us lol worthy enough.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Obviously he didn't have to say will for it to be a naive sentiment.

Obviously.
You think it's naive only because like the masses of conbots you rail against, you're under the erroneous perception that ISIL is a terrorist group.

Congrats.

Just the fact that anyone wants them to be eradicated us lol worthy enough.
Why do you hate brown people so much?
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
So, you want to try again, and admit that you were putting words into Bears mouth to push your own agenda.
He does that all the time, as does his on again off again buddy. You have a better chance of getting it to rain ginger ale than getting either to admit they erred or purposely acted deceitfully.

Which I addressed in the post he's dancing so awkwardly to avoid.