I believe there only being one per company, the number might be a limitation!
I stayed long enough to outwit you didn't I?
Is it time to start closing the wage gap?
- Thread starter JLM
- Start date
I believe there only being one per company, the number might be a limitation!
I stayed long enough to outwit you didn't I?
I don't think you stayed long enough to outwit anybody. I'm starting to lose track of all the members here that have pwned your silly asss
The real question here is why are you so jealous of others. If they passed a law cutting CEO salaries in half, how would it benefit anybody except to help failures like you to feel better about themselves? In reality, you'll always have low self worth because it stems from your own lack of accomplishment and dragging others down really won't help you. Look at CB. He also see himself as disadvantaged and no amount of government intervention to help him feel better will make a difference. Start trying to improve yourself instead of dragging others down.
I think before everyone gets their undies in a knot people should go back to the beginning where I proposed cutting the "fat cat" back so that the working poor like the ones who frequent the food banks could get a measly $1 an hour wage raise. I never proposed pulling anybody down, just attempting to slightly stem the condition of "the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer". It's too bad a couple of the usual suspects have to resort to acting like A$$holes.
Try this. Buy a share in a company and go vote and voice your disdain at the shareholders meetings.
If you have no interest in a company, go f-ck yourself.
If you have no interest in a company, go f-ck yourself.
I think before everyone gets their undies in a knot people should go back to the beginning where I proposed cutting the "fat cat" back so that the working poor like the ones who frequent the food banks could get a measly $1 an hour wage raise. I never proposed pulling anybody down, just attempting to slightly stem the condition of "the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer". It's too bad a couple of the usual suspects have to resort to acting like A$$holes.
You're confusing making fun of your silly ideas with getting undies in a knot. That would not be your first mistake
If anybody was paying attention they would have noticed that most of the so called renumeration came in the value of shares . If the value of the shares didn't rise they would not have received 184 x's the minimum salary .
they may even have received zero for those shares .