The only way I can differentiate the difference : religion is dogma, spirituality is without dogma. Or another way of putting it: Religion is for those who are afraid of going to hell, spirituality is for those who have already been there.
The word religion has nothing to do with the organized cults of today. However it may be impossible to save the word such is the very bad taste left in the mind when speaking it. I've posted it before but here it is again, religion means a return to the origin, which entails remembering home. That's quite loose but close enough. If you remember my early post here I was loath to use the word without spitting and washing my mouth out with beer.
In a final form, the Messiah was the immortal spirit in man, or the Christ within, according to the language of Paul. Those who understood these things could not take to, or be taken in by, historic Christianity; could only think of it as did Celsus when he says of the Christians:
"Certain most impious errors are committed by them, which are due to their extreme ignorance, in which they have wandered away from the meaning of the divine enigmas"; and as did Porphyry, who denounced the Christian religion as a
"blasphemy, barbarously bold." The Christian doctrine of being
born again was derived without knowledge from this Gnostic
re-birth, which was the conversion of the total man, and his seven lower souls, into a likeness of his supreme or divine self, with the eighth one, the Christ-spirit, as the reproducer for eternal life. Paul sometimes claims that he possesses this Christ-nature, this Revealer within, because, according to the Gnostics, humanity could attain to the divine altitude, and demonstrate upon the Mount of Transfiguration the immortal element in the nature of man. The Christian world let go, and lost this basis that Paul found in natural, though supra-normal fact, when it ignorantly substituted the
modus operandi of miracle applied to a physical resurrection.
http://pc93.tripod.com/gmlectrs.htm
http://pc93.tripod.com/lostlght.htm
The Western world has too long and fatuously labored under the delusion that a pious and devout disposition fulfills the whole requirement of true religion. Ancient sagacity knew that piety without intelligence, or religion without philosophy, was insufficient and dangerous. It knew that general good intent was not safe from aberrancy, folly and fanaticism unless it was directed by the highest powers and resources of the mind. And the mind itself had to be fortified with specific knowledge of the nature of the cosmos and of man and the relation between the two. Following the dictum of the sage, Hermes Trismegistus, that "the vice of a soul is ignorance, the virtue of a soul is knowledge," the scriptures of old inculcated the precept that with all man’s getting he must first get wisdom and understanding.
The corruption and final loss of the basic meaning of these scriptures has been, in the whole of time, the greatest tragedy in human
history.
Carpenter makes it clear that the coming of a Savior-God was in no sense a belief distinctive of Christianity. He explains that the Messianic prophecies of the Jews and the fifty-third chapter of
Isaiah infected Christian teaching to some degree with Judaic influence. The Hebrew word Messiah, meaning
"The Anointed One," occurs some forty times in the Old Testament; and each time in the Septuagint, written as early as the third century before our era, it is translated Christos, which also means "Anointed." It is thus seen, says Carpenter, that the word "the Christ" was in vogue in Alexandria as far back as 280 B.C. In the Book of Enoch, written not later than B.C. 170, the Christ is spoken of as already existing in heaven, about to come to earth, and is called "The Son of Man." The
Book of Revelation is full of passages from
Enoch, likewise the Epistles of Paul and the Gospels.