Did you hear NDP wrongly spent $2.7m taxpayer dollars?

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
67
Maybe not.

But anyway kids...

This money is supposed to go towards Parliamentary business in Ottawa. Instead, the NDP funneled the money into hiring staff hiring staff to run a campaign office in Montreal.

The NDP were eventually caught red-handed, but are refusing to pay back the $2.7 million they owe.

Thomas Mulcair and the NDP took your money – TELL THEM TO PAY IT BACK!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxanlylFkq8&feature=youtu.be
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
212
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Did you hear Ontario Liberals lost 60 billion dollars? Did you hear Harper's sunshine and rainbows budget - the one he DIPped into the emergency fund for - is a billion dollars short? Be worried about NDP
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Dumb move, they blew their load too early.

They should have saved this talking point closer to the election.
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
In a somewhat inaccurate YouTube video, the Conservatives ask: “Have you heard about the NDP using $2.7 million dollars from taxpayers to hire partisan campaign staff?”










Tories spent $750M of taxpayers' money to promote themselves, then attack the NDP for allegedly spending $3M








Considering their own sorry record (which includes spending $750 million of taxpayers' money on partisan government advertising that merely promotes the Conservative Party's agenda), it's pretty rich of the Harper Conservatives to be attacking their NDP opponents over this.




The Conservative government has booked $13.5 million for an all-out, co-ordinated blitz in April and May to advertise its 2015 pre-election budget.


The push, detailed in internal government documents obtained by The Canadian Press, builds on existing Finance Canada and Canada Revenue Agency campaigns to promote Conservative tax measures both past and proposed — the backbone of the Harper government's re-election strategy.





A private member's bill by Liberal MP David McGuinty proposes to have all government advertising cleared in advance by the auditor general's office to ensure it is informative and non-partisan.


McGuinty's brother, former Ontario premier Dalton McGuinty, presided over the introduction of a similar provincial law in 2004 that gave the province's auditor the job of scanning ads for partisanship before they were released.


"The prime minister cynically preaches restraint, yet he's spent more than $750 million (since 2006) on ineffective and wasteful partisan advertising," McGuinty charged Monday in the daily question period.


New Democrats, meanwhile, responded to the Liberal opposition day motion by issuing a release citing the $953.6 million spent on government ads under the Liberals between 1998 and 2006.


As a result of revelations about the federal sponsorship scandal, ad spending by the Liberals dropped dramatically in their last three years in office, averaging $53.5 million a year.

Under the Conservatives, ad spending averaged about $84 million a year through 2014, according to figures compiled from annual advertising reports and government estimates.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
67
No, this ad is new.

That's what I'm referring to.

Obviously.

Man! You feel like a woman. :lol:

Just kidding. You're cute in a naive sorta way.

Goddamn son, if you think a little ad like that is a 'load' from the CPC war chest, you best start attending the real world meetings.

Anyway, we'll keep you updated as the need may arise m'kay. I'll let you get back to the help lines.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
That's the most egregious thing you can find on the federal NDP.

Unless you think allusions to Greece and carbon taxes will work lol
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
Longer federal election campaign would cost taxpayers millions more

Parties reimbursed for election expenses - which could go up significantly during a long campaign





It's not just political parties that will be spending money hand over fist if Stephen Harper fires the starting gun for the Oct. 19 federal election weeks earlier than necessary.


Taxpayers will be shelling out big bucks, too — millions in extra administrative costs and tens of millions more in rebates to parties and candidates for their inflated election expenses.


Most of the money parties and candidates will be throwing around during the campaign comes from donations, which are worth a generous tax credit of 75 per cent on the first $400, 50 per cent on the next $350 and 33.3 per cent on the next $500.


The Canadian Taxpayers Federation estimates those tax credits are worth somewhere between $16 million and $36 million per year in foregone revenue.


Each party running a full slate of candidates is entitled to spend a maximum of about $25 million for a five-week campaign; each candidate an average of about $100,000.


But, under the recently passed Fair Elections Act, those spending limits will increase by 1/37 for each day a campaign exceeds 37 days. That's an extra $675,000 per day for each party's national campaign, an additional $2,700 per day for their candidates.


A campaign that is double the minimum length would effectively double the spending limits and, theoretically, double the amount of money parties and candidates stand to be reimbursed — by taxpayers — when it's all over.




Longer federal election campaign would cost taxpayers millions more - Politics - CBC News






Canada's governing Conservatives are likely to lengthen this year's election campaign by launching it in August, three senior party sources said, a move that would benefit the cash-rich party.


Canadians go to the polls on Oct. 19. Given that campaigns must last at least 37 days, the latest date Prime Minister Stephen Harper could start this year's would be Sept. 13. Five of the last six campaigns have run about that length.






But the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Harper's party already has its machinery in place and is expected to launch the campaign in August, possibly the first week. This would benefit the Conservatives, who last year changed a law that had imposed a maximum spending limit of around C$25 million ($19 million) on campaigns.





The new law increased the limit by about C$700,000 for every day beyond the minimum 37-day length.





The Conservatives have a larger donor base than their rivals and raised C$6.3 million in the first quarter, more than the two main opposition parties combined.





"A long campaign financially exhausts the other parties," said one person familiar with Conservative strategy.








more




Canada Conservatives likely to lengthen election campaign: sources | Canada | Reuters
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
The forces of the right must be out hunting like kids at an Easter Egg Hunt.
This is old news. Not only that they are going to compare this single
incident to the long list of offenses attributed to the Tory Government that
promised to put an end to such activity. This government more than most
has transgressed the people. Have we nothing better to debate than this?
I suppose it is better than talking about the mess they have made the poor
state of economy yes we're in a recession and they have ticked of vets,
seniors and a host of others wouldn't want to discuss it though we will focus
on old news. For the Tories the scandals are not finished. They got Duffy to
do their dirty work then threw him under the bus.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,342
113
Vancouver Island
Old story with the NDP. Since even they claim there is no real difference between fed and provincial dippers they are all guilty. Years back the BC NDP (aka Non Democratic Parasites) stole money from a charity bingo they ran and diverted the money into partisan political machine. One more reason why they must never get hold of the taxpayer's chequebook.