I'm sure that was the cry of the day back then too..........
Mildred Jeter, an African-American woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, were indicted in 1958 for violating Virginia’s ban on interracial marriages after they married in the District of Columbia and then returned to Virginia.
They brought their case before the Supreme Court, which decided that Virginia's anti-miscegenation laws could not stand consistently with the Fourteenth Amendment.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/388/1
This honestly made me laugh; obviously you don't know much about the US as it is today, right? Marriage between gays won't do this, it's already going on and has been for, well, a long, long time in the US.
As opposed to the last Dark Age, which was fueled by the exact theocratic fascism you espouse.That's right. The U.S., Canada, the West have been in a state of moral, economic, cultural and social disintegration for 40+ years.
The Middle Class has been wiped out.. the economy has been deindustrialized by Global Free Markets founded on an ethos of greed and exploitation.. occult superstitions on which radical environtalism, AGW, cosmology are based have supplanted real science and the scientific method .. the central structural civilizational component of marriage has been reduced to an absurdity.. moral relativism, self gratification are the prime directives of the day. The legitimization of same sex unions is a symptom of a profound disorder that will rip the West apart.
A Dark Age, filled with violence, ignorance and want looms.
I've noticed it for a while, but it's definitely a sign of victory that homophobia's arguments have become this anemic. It used to be that you could just give your unfiltered bigotry. Now like racism you have to cloak in sad, nonsensical bull**** like this.
It must be hard for you to make such a limp argument and know that no one actually gives a **** or even comes to close to accepting the basic premise of your argument let alone the idea that it actually diminishes "the nuclear family".
I can see it now.
Republicans trying to sway the gay voter to their side.
It's the perfect stragedy!
Tecumseh got to the point before I did.
Well done.
Somebody better watch this guy.
He's likely to go full on jihadist.
That's true, but I don't think it would be motivating enough if the Republican candidate was, say, another Romney. Why vote for the Republican when you know it won't actually get you what you want?
I think we can give more credit to most people in this day and age.
At least in democratic states.
I really think we're on a good trajectory here in the long run.
Bottom line is it's just about people sticking their nose where it doesn't belong. It simply isn't their business, it doesn't threaten anything. Don't "like it"? Fine, great even. Feel free to not like it to your hearts content. Who cares?
Pollyanna.
Haltingly, painfully, with many setbacks. . . but nonetheless, the arc of the moral universe is bending toward justice.
So maybe you ain't all that much of a Pollyanna.
It was a good day. The circle of people who qualify as fully human grew a little.
Not a bad day's work for the Court.
300 years
Yes, it's only been on the live forum feed for the last 24 hours, lol.
I merged.
Is thread marriage legal yet?
The right to privacy? Tell that to the NSA. In America the govt. doesn't recognize privacy.
Is thread marriage legal yet?