American, Italian Hostages Killed in CIA Drone Strike in January

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
American, Italian Hostages Killed in CIA Drone Strike in January



A U.S. drone strike in January targeting a suspected al Qaeda compound in Pakistan inadvertently killed an American and Italian being held hostage by the group, senior Obama administration officials said.

The killing of American development expert Warren Weinstein and Italian aid worker Giovanni Lo Porto is the first known instance in which the U.S. has accidentally killed a hostage in a drone strike.

The mishap represents a major blow to the Central Intelligence Agency and its covert drone program in Pakistan, which President Barack Obama embraced and expanded after coming to office in 2009.

The incident also underscores the limits of U.S. intelligence and the risk of unintended consequences in executing a targeted killing program which, according to human-rights groups, endangers civilians. U.S. officials say the strikes are needed to combat al Qaeda. To mitigate the risks, officials say the CIA won’t launch missiles at a suspected target if they know civilians are present.

Mr. Obama, speaking at the White House Thursday morning, said he takes “full responsibility” for the death of the two hostages in the strike. He also conveyed his “deepest apologies” and “profound regret” for the operation.

The White House has launched a review of the January strike to see if changes are needed to the drone program to avoid similar mistakes. Officials said the program hasn’t been curtailed so far in response.

In addition to the hostages, U.S. intelligence agencies believe American-born al Qaeda spokesman Adam Gadahn was killed in January in a separate incident. U.S. intelligence analysts believe he was likely killed in a CIA drone strike that took place after the one that killed Messrs. Weinstein and Lo Porto.

The CIA had been closely monitoring the suspected al Qaeda compound in Pakistan’s tribal areas for weeks leading up to the strike that killed the two hostages. The agency collected hundreds of hours of surveillance. Then, a few days before the strike was launched, that surveillance was increased, giving the CIA near-constant visibility of the site and those entering it.

At no point during that extended period of surveillance did the U.S. spy agency detect the presence of the two hostages or of any other civilians inside the compound, which they thought was being used by al Qaeda militants, the officials said. U.S. intelligence agencies now believe al Qaeda took extraordinary measures to keep the hostages inside and out of sight.

Along with Messrs. Weinstein and Lo Porto, the strike on the compound killed al Qaeda leader, Ahmed Farouq, another American citizen, the officials said. The CIA had observed what they believed to be a senior al Qaeda member entering the compound in the days just before the strike but intelligence analysts didn’t know that it was Mr. Farouq, the officials said.

Similarly, the CIA didn’t know that Mr. Gadahn was at the compound that it bombed later in the month.

The White House normally would need to seek special legal clearances to directly target American citizens suspected of plotting attacks against the U.S. That process didn’t apply in these cases because Messrs. Farouq and Gadahn weren’t being directly targeted in the operations, officials said.

Mr. Gadahn has long been seen as an important al Qaeda propagandist and was indicted during the Bush administration on charges of treason and material support for terrorism.

U.S. intelligence agencies identified Mr. Farouq as an operational leader who recently assumed the role of deputy emir of a new group known as al Qaeda in Indian Subcontinent, or AQIS.

Details about CIA drone strikes in Pakistan are normally kept secret. In this case, Mr. Obama decided to declassify some of the information about the strike that killed Messrs. Weinstein and Lo Porto because of the U.S. government’s responsibility for the incident, administration officials said.

The officials who spoke about the incident, however, declined to provide some details, including the date of the drone strike and precisely where the strike took place. The U.S. has conducted five drone strikes in Pakistan so far in 2015, well below the peak pace of 117 strikes in 2010, according to the Long War Journal, a website that tracks drone strikes in Pakistan.

Typically, it can take the CIA weeks or longer to determine who was killed in a drone strike.



In February, U.S. spy agencies began to pick up intelligence that Messrs. Weinstein and Lo Porto had been killed, but they didn’t know how. At the time, U.S. officials thought that in addition to a possible drone strike, the hostages could have been killed in a military operation conducted by Pakistani forces.

To make a determination, U.S. spy agencies pored over CIA drone feeds, intercepted communications and other types of intelligence.

A few days ago, U.S. intelligence agencies concluded with a high degree of confidence that the hostages were killed in the January drone strike. They then began the process of notifying relatives of the deceased as well as the Italian government and key congressional committees.

Mr. Weinstein was abducted from his guarded home in August 2011 in Pakistan’s relatively safe eastern city of Lahore.

In a video released by al Qaeda’s media arm in 2013, Mr. Weinstein made a direct appeal to Mr. Obama to negotiate his release, saying that he felt “totally abandoned” by the U.S. government.

He was employed at the time by a private U.S. contractor, J.E. Austin Associates Inc., which was working on a project for the U.S. Agency for International Development, a government agency responsible for nonmilitary foreign assistance. Pakistan is a major recipient of American aid.

U.S. officials said they have regularly briefed Mr. Weinstein’s family about U.S. efforts to find him, but U.S. intelligence agencies didn’t know where he was being held in Pakistan and didn’t attempt an operation to free him.

U.S. intelligence agencies didn’t realize that Mr. Weinstein was being held alongside Mr. Lo Porto until after analysts determined that they were killed at the compound in the January strike.

Many top al Qaeda leaders in Pakistan have been killed by the CIA’s campaign of drone strikes, which Mr. Obama ramped up after taking office.

In recent years, the number of CIA drone strikes in Pakistan has declined sharply, as U.S. military forces have pulled out of Afghanistan and as more of the group’s leaders were killed, casting doubt on its ability to carry out large-scale attacks on the U.S. The drop-off in strikes also coincided with growing criticism of the program by human rights groups and Pakistan’s government.

While the pace of CIA strikes in Pakistan has declined, the Obama administration has ramped up counterterrorism campaigns using drones and manned aircraft in areas of the Middle East and north Africa where al Qaeda affiliates, and the Islamic State militant group, have thrived.

source: American, Italian Hostages Killed in CIA Drone Strike in January - WSJ
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,723
9,689
113
Washington DC
This is going to sound kinda brutal, but there may be an upside here. I've always thought that our concern for hostages benefits our enemies and hobbles us. Perhaps there would be less hostage-taking if our policy was "If you take hostages, we will kill you. The presence of hostages will not stop us."
 

BaalsTears

Senate Member
Jan 25, 2011
5,732
0
36
Santa Cruz, California
There is proof that there was a terrorist plan against the USA, which justifies the attack on the compound.

I guess, in Obama's words; "Al Qaeda is NOT decimated, not of they are planning attacks on the Homeland."

The greatest terrorist in the world lives in the White House. His name is Barack.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Obama has assumed responsibility for the deaths of the two Americans and the Italian. He's got blood on his hands.
Bush and Cheney have the blood of a million or more. You don't seem to care about that but Obama has has the blood of three people and you get on your high horse. I'll never understand such hatred.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Poor intelligence on a remote Al Qaeda compound and what should be an easy intel operation. Is the army short on good vacuum cleaner salesmen or JW's these days?
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Bush and Cheney have the blood of a million or more. You don't seem to care about that but Obama has has the blood of three people and you get on your high horse. I'll never understand such hatred.

lmao

Make it a billion... or a trillion!
 

gore0bsessed

Time Out
Oct 23, 2011
2,414
0
36
Bush and Cheney have the blood of a million or more. You don't seem to care about that but Obama has has the blood of three people and you get on your high horse. I'll never understand such hatred.
the government of America since forever has got blood on their hands
 

gore0bsessed

Time Out
Oct 23, 2011
2,414
0
36
he thinks america is perfect and does no wrong, which is hilarious because the history of american foreign policy is probably the most disgusting thing in human history.

also claiming every other government has blood on their hands too is disegenious at best and only attempts to deflect blame.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,723
9,689
113
Washington DC
he thinks america is perfect and does no wrong, which is hilarious because the history of american foreign policy is probably the most disgusting thing in human history.
Nah, our domestic policy's way worse. Slavery, genocide, Jim Crow, legalized rape, capitalism, &c. Did you forget all that?
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
Bush and Cheney have the blood of a million or more. You don't seem to care about that but Obama has has the blood of three people and you get on your high horse. I'll never understand such hatred.
lol...just about picking sides and willful ignorance...I am lovin' this on one hand on the other it evokes a certain amount of terror that actually strikes fairly deeply at my core

more and more I value the circle of people I have chosen for my world...more and more
 

Ludlow

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 7, 2014
13,588
0
36
wherever i sit down my ars
lol...just about picking sides and willful ignorance...I am lovin' this on one hand on the other it evokes a certain amount of terror that actually strikes fairly deeply at my core

more and more I value the circle of people I have chosen for my world...more and more
I can relate. These days my circle is small. 3 daughters and one step son. I have no doubt that they care about me.
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
I can relate. These days my circle is small. 3 daughters and one step son. I have no doubt that they care about me.
at least you have a circle and that is significant, that is so significant

today I sat chatting with my guy while we were waiting for an appointment...we were discussing the American election and various candidates, along with various social issues...there is no cruelty in this man, very little anger, no need to one up another human being and no need to put another down...he is just a simple everyday guy who works hard

While looking at him, and listening to him speak, I was suddenly hit with the awe of what our potential is and what is actually important in the day to day things as well as the big picture....

sometimes kindness makes me weep
 

Ludlow

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 7, 2014
13,588
0
36
wherever i sit down my ars
at least you have a circle and that is significant, that is so significant

today I sat chatting with my guy while we were waiting for an appointment...we were discussing the American election and various candidates, along with various social issues...there is no cruelty in this man, very little anger, no need to one up another human being and no need to put another down...he is just a simple everyday guy who works hard

While looking at him, and listening to him speak, I was suddenly hit with the awe of what our potential is and what is actually important in the day to day things as well as the big picture....

sometimes kindness makes me weep
it's a good thing to have someone to confide in. You're fortunate in that regard. :).
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
Because it is in such short supply. Sometimes the anger, hatred and belligerence on here makes me want to vomit.
it is in deed in short supply, it is nice to be surrounded by kindness yes and I love to be shocked by it...ya know where you expect the worst and it should happen and then because someone has evolved it doesn't...I love that

it's a good thing to have someone to confide in. You're fortunate in that regard. :).
yes it is good to have people to confide in, I have always been blessed that way with friends that were trustworthy...it is also nice to have people to look at and think I want to develop that part of me...I want to be like that...that is what I look for as old age is approaching...i want to be inspired, I want to hear weird and wonderous tales... my priorities are shifting as I age and sometimes the direction of the shift surprises me...that took me by surprise today...watching someone's mouth move and hearing what they were saying but thinking...wow, what a wonderous spirit they have...I want to be that