well that is a crying shame.
yep. a shame we didn't have us a bonafide indian in here to keep these things straight.
well that is a crying shame.
yep. a shame we didn't have us a bonafide indian in here to keep these things straight.
Last week The Ryersonian reported on an incident that involved two first-year journalism students who were turned away from an event organized by Racialized Students' Collective because they are white. Since then there has been a lot of commentary on the piece and a lot of debate -- a lot of the criticism is valid.
There are two sides to the story: 1) the media has a right to attend public events and report on matters that are in the public interest. The student media needs to cover initiatives that are happening on campus so that we draw attention to them and in turn create awareness (The Ryersonian reported that one student said he was covering the meeting for an assignment). 2) Marginalized groups have a right to claim spaces in the public realm where they can share stories about the discrimination they have faced without judgment and intrusion from anyone else.
I am a person of colour and a journalist and so there are two conflicting voices inside my head. But in this case one voice, that of a person of colour, is louder and my conscience does not allow me to be impartial. I have to take a side.
Ethnic Minorities Deserve Safe Spaces Without White PeopleÂ*|Â*Aeman Ansari
Politics: HuffPo column: Minorities need a safe place where there are no white people | Best of Cain
I need a safe place where there are no stupid people.
Sure, why not?Dare I say it?
That's kinda the whole point. Sorry you missed it.Crime statistics would suggest that people of colour need a safe place without people of colour to victimize them.
FBI — Expanded Homicide Data Table 6
That sounds like the triumph of hope over experience.
Dare to dream.