How the GW myth is perpetuated

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Clearly... the funding of testimony given by academics has value... but to who? Those seven individuals have been on the U.S. Republicans regular go-to list for years, to give testimony before an assortment of U.S. Congressional Committees. The U.S. politician (Democratic) has stated: "I want the disclosure of funding sources. Then people can draw their own conclusions."

presumably the requested disclosure, if provided, comes directly from the targeted individuals themselves and/or via their academic institute attachments. Is there a problem... in allowing people to draw their own conclusions?
 

Zipperfish

House Member
Apr 12, 2013
3,688
0
36
Vancouver
Onward Climate Soldiers

By EBD on March 4, 2015 12:01 AM | 3 Comments



Three years ago the thin-skinned wizard of Penn State let everyone in the world know in the clearest possible terms that his version of climate science is not a process of discovery based on research and new information, but a proselytizing mission:
Climate scientist Michael Mann, who has appeared at political events supporting candidates calling for the U.S. government to act more forcefully, said in 2011, "I gave up on Judith Curry a while ago. I don't know what she thinks she's doing, but it's not helping the cause."​
(emph. mine)
Why is his work still being cited by warmists? When a scientist who touts an unproven theory denounces as heretical those who continue to do honest research, no scientist, regardless of his views, should ever take him seriously.

Climate scientists accuse Democrat of McCarthyism - Watchdog.org

Theories aren't proven, f*cktard. Seriously, at least take Grade 8 science before stepping up to the plate. It does make it easier to spot the idiots though. Except for taxslave. One look at that nick and that avatar and it's like "OK, gonna have to talk reeeaaallll slow for this one." :lol:
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,406
12,832
113
Low Earth Orbit
The propaganda and induced panic IS proven ya f-cking fart knocker and making taxslaves of the lot of us.

Has hypoxia set in on Planet Jar?

So much for the theory being substantiated.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
46
48
66
Clearly... the funding of testimony given by academics has value... but to who? Those seven individuals have been on the U.S. Republicans regular go-to list for years, to give testimony before an assortment of U.S. Congressional Committees. The U.S. politician (Democratic) has stated: "I want the disclosure of funding sources. Then people can draw their own conclusions."

presumably the requested disclosure, if provided, comes directly from the targeted individuals themselves and/or via their academic institute attachments. Is there a problem... in allowing people to draw their own conclusions?

who are you mr. 'calm and non-confrontational person' and what did you did with waldo? :lol:

the forum thanks you.

Theories aren't proven, f*cktard. Seriously, at least take Grade 8 science before stepping up to the plate. It does make it easier to spot the idiots though. Except for taxslave. One look at that nick and that avatar and it's like "OK, gonna have to talk reeeaaallll slow for this one." :lol:

hey, leave the writer (EBD) a comment expressing your dissatisfaction with his terminology. it's his post not mine.

but just for fun, let's insert 'alarmist' or 'money-grubbing egotistical' or 'retarded' for 'unproven'.

and for extra ha-ha, we could put in 'nobel laureate recipient liar' in place of 'scientist'. ;-)
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
who are you mr. 'calm and non-confrontational person' and what did you did with waldo? :lol:

the forum thanks you.

and here I was about to comment about the now neutered Locutus! Good times... the forum thanks you. And all it took was for another member to strike up a couple of threads on the boards lacking/failed moderation and the pointedly targeted big-time failures of one particular moderator.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
46
48
66
and here I was about to comment about the now neutered Locutus! Good times... the forum thanks you. And all it took was for another member to strike up a couple of threads on the boards lacking/failed moderation and the pointedly targeted big-time failures of one particular moderator.



I've changed nothing and most everyone here still thinks you're a dick.

but you might be better received by those stronger members you ran away from because of a lack of self-control if you post more like the man Mister Rogers would want you to be.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario


i've changed nothing and most everyone here still thinks you're a dick.

But you might be better received by those stronger members you ran away from because of a lack of self-control if you post more like the man mister rogers would want you to be.
lmao!!!
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
I've changed nothing and most everyone here still thinks you're a dick.

but you might be better received by those stronger members you ran away from because of a lack of self-control if you post more like the man Mister Rogers would want you to be
.

nah, you're neutered now... and your "I've changed nothing" clearly speaks to your Jimmies being rustled! Clearly, you've had your peepee wacked! No need for you to attempt to save face here Locutus. Everyone recognizes your ongoing charade.

you keep talking about these so-called "stronger members"... either get over I've used the board's IGNORE FEATURE, or rescind the feature. Quit whining about it! As for that "strength" you keep pining over, is farm-labourer another name for "earth scientist" :mrgreen:... I certainly don't recognize strength as a measure of how many drywall related pics (or butt-hurt pics) an intellectually challenged member can post. Are you referring to the strength of the ongoing RRR (ReadyReddieRollout) campaign? Do you personally see strength in the lapdog actions of others? Are these your kinds of strength, hey Locutus?
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
3
36
London, Ontario


I've changed nothing and most everyone here still thinks you're a dick.

but you might be better received by those stronger members you ran away from because of a lack of self-control if you post more like the man Mister Rogers would want you to be.


Let's see what happens when I quote the first one.

As I suspected. Nothing.

Bear broke your picture.

Sigh, this is why we can't have nice things.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
46
48
66
Let's see what happens when I quote the first one.

As I suspected. Nothing.

Bear broke your picture.

Sigh, this is why we can't have nice things.

oh well, these things happen.

a shame buddy couldn't have reacted with a funny bone on the opening I so graciously granted him rather than with he-mad spittle again. dems da breaks. :lol:

p.s. way to go Bear!