Your nation only occupied the smallest portion that you were allowed to occupy at that time.
The UK presently maintains insignificant forces to even consider holding Mainstreet in a small town, let alone any endeavor that would think about an entire nation
The Afghans have repelled Britain on a number of occasions...
Blackie doesn't understand the concept of guerrilla warfare. He believes taking the Parliament means you've taken the country. He stuck in the 1940s which is not surprising considering that was the last time Brittain was even remotely relevantYour nation only occupied the smallest portion that you were allowed to occupy at that time.
The UK presently maintains insignificant forces to even consider holding Mainstreet in a small town, let alone any endeavor that would think about an entire nation
The Afghans have repelled Britain on a number of occasions... Making up excuses long after the fact in no way validates the inability of your military mistakes
Blackie doesn't understand the concept of guerrilla warfare.
Guerilla warfare has been around for THOUSANDS of years, yet it doesn't stop countries being invaded. Countries have been invaded for millennia, despite guerilla warfare. The British encountered guerilla warfare throughout their vast, glorious empire, yet for the most part it has little effect.
protip: Prove IT!!
They failed in 1812, they failed in Vietnam, they failed in Iraq (some say they didn't).
We could take out their power grid starting with Quebec and Ontario power lines that send power to them.
We could cut off Oil and Gas supply, can't fight a war without oil.
Urban warfare is different from conventional war. That is the problem with the NEW wars these days..
They couldnt win Iraq or Vietnam. Canada would be impossible to hold completely in a guerilla war.
Where will you get the guerrillas?
That was cute Cannuck!
Dirty bombs... like will you light bags of sh*t on fire and ring peoples doorbells then run back across the border?
That was cute Cannuck!
Dirty bombs... like will you light bags of sh*t on fire and ring peoples doorbells then run back across the border?
No country could beat us as the US of A would step on them.
What's cute is that you allow a few terrorists to take down the World Trade Center, killing 3000 people armed with nothing but box cutters and then underestimate the ability of a wealthy educated society to inflict some serious damage on you
Boomer dredged up one of the oldest arguments we used to have on this forum back in the beginning. During the Iraq War (closer to the beginning) some Canadians were absolutely convinced that Canada was next.
Name 1 country that could beat Canada in an all out war
protip: you can't
I don't think the U.S. Would ever invade Canada. The argument about whether it would happen and how it would play out if it ever did are entirely different.
What, making fun of Brits and Americans that enjoy ***** measuring contest? Excited probably isn't the right wordGet's you all excited doesn't it?
What, making fun of Brits and Americans that enjoy ***** measuring contest? Excited probably isn't the right word
Nobody would ever dare invade Canada, we would run to your side without blinking.
Say what? Seems like you're trying to get your own **** measured.
I'm sure it seems that way to you. I'm not really surprised.
There are more guns per capita in Canada than In the United States. Considering how well educated population is, not to mention how wealthy it is, we would have no trouble taking the fight to the Americans. Considering how difficult it is to stop Mexicans from streaming across your southern border, it would be virtually impossible for you to stop the Canadians from coming down and setting off dirty bombs and your major cities.