NDP support Trudeau bill to open up secretive board on parliamentary conduct

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Justin Trudeau bill would open up secretive Board of Internal Economy

Just hours after the all-party Board of Internal Economy went behind closed doors to discuss sexual harassment complaints lodged against two Liberal MPs, Justin Trudeau got his first chance to promote his bid to hold future board meetings in public.

The Liberal leader presented his private member's bill to the House Tuesday night.

It would require board members to meet in public unless they intend to deal with specific issues requiring confidentiality, such as "security, employment, staff relations or tenders," according to the draft text.

Trudeau's bill would also let the board meet in private with the unanimous consent of all members.

Currently, even the dates and times of scheduled meetings are secret and the meeting room is located in an area of Centre Block off-limits to media.

That hasn't stopped Hill reporters from attempting to cover the proceedings when they land in the middle of a high-profile political controversy, however.

Earlier this year, the board came under fire from its own NDP members after rejecting their call to open up its probe of the party's allegedly improper use of House resources to pay for out-of-town satellite offices and mailings.

has found itself under increasing pressure to look into harassment on the Hill.

Confidentiality concerns

Liberal whip Judy Foote has formally asked House Speaker Andrew Scheer, who heads up the board, to handle the details of any future outside investigation into the allegations against MPs Scott Andrews, from Newfoundland and Labrador, and Massimo Pacetti, from Quebec. The MPs have been suspended from the Liberal caucus until the matter has been resolved.

Last week, New Democrat Leader Tom Mulcair sent a letter to his Conservative and Liberal counterparts that calls for a more comprehensive approach, including a formal code of conduct, as well as a new officer of Parliament to investigate complaints and a fully confidential process.

Speaking with CBC News on Monday night, Liberal spokeswoman Kate Purchase said there's no conflict between Trudeau's proposal for a more transparent board and the need to keep sensitive matters — such as harassment complaints — private.

"The goal of [Trudeau's bill] is to make the [board] open by default, but of course, in instances where sensitive, personal matters are being discussed, the board would continue to have the ability to go in camera," she told CBC News.

She also pointed out that the Liberals don't want the board itself to investigate the complaints against Andrews and Pacetti, but to "bring in a third-party, neutral investigator."

'A good idea is a good idea': NDP

Meanwhile, despite some lingering anger over how Trudeau dealt with the harassment complaints — specifically, his decision to go public with the suspensions without giving notice to the still unnamed complainants — NDP MPs are expected to support sending his bill to committee when it goes to a vote, which will likely happen early next year.

"We’ll support it," caucus spokeswoman Greta Levy told CBC News.

"Opening up the [board] has been our policy for years now, and I think we appropriately congratulated Mr. Trudeau for adopting our idea a few months ago."

Levy noted that her party had tried to garner the necessary consent for an earlier motion to do the same.

"But a good idea is a good idea," she said.

http://www.cbc.ca/m/news/politics/j...secretive-board-of-internal-economy-1.2838076
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Justin Trudeau bill would open up secretive Board of Internal Economy

Justine should start with his side business of wh*ring his @ss as a public speaker for cash, particularly those times when he skipped-out on his duties and was supposed to be in Parliament as a paid MP.

... Opps... This might be a little uncomfortable for Trudeau
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Guess who doesn't want this board to be less secretive?

What gives this Board the right to address complaints. They are corrupted.
Why does this board refuse to have the Aud General perform audits on all of their expenditures? Each and every year a full audit.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/1...no-matter-how-serious-misconduct-allegations/

OTTAWA — Tom Mulcair says two female New Democrat MPs shouldn’t be pushed to lodge formal complaints against two of their Liberal counterparts, no matter how serious their allegations might be.

The NDP leader says no one has the right to decide for victims what they should do or how fast they should do it.

The Canadian Press has learned that NDP MP Craig Scott, a former law professor, told the Liberals that one of the misconduct incidents — as it was described to him — amounted to an allegation of sexual assault.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
As with everything to date, Justine does these things for the sake of the optics more than anything else.

I still have no use for Harper after his screwing the Vets and the Military is part of why - But hairball is well overdone and under qualified.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
I still have no use for Harper after his screwing the Vets and the Military is part of why - But hairball is well overdone and under qualified.


Way under qualified for sure and needs a lot more experience before anyone could possibly take him seriously. He might start by publishing some actual policies for his Party
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
12,440
1,396
113
60
Alberta
Let's break this down shall we.

MPs Scott Andrews and Massimo Pachetti were suspended from caucus by Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau last week amid allegations that the pair harassed two female NDP MPs, who have not been identified.
So basically we have put a scarlet letter on these two individuals, even though the complainants have not been identified.
Andrews and Pachetti say they did nothing wrong.
So neither MP has admitted to the unsubstntiated charges against them.
The NDP MPs did not file formal complaints. However, one approached Trudeau with the allegations of misconduct, and then shared her story in a private room with Liberal and NDP party whips at a closed-door meeting on Oct. 30.
They did not file formal complaints, but one did approach Trudeau maximizing the damage to the MP without actually filing a aformal complaint.
It was there that Toronto NDP MP Craig Scott, a former law professor, stated that one of the harassment accusations could be considered sexual assault, which is a criminal offence.
Provided that the allegations are true and someone actually files charges.
But Liberals say that sparked the decision to go public.
With no formal charges, allegations as proof of guilt and no way for either accused to defend themselves.
Does no one else find this process absolutely horrific? Granted, both MP's could be guilty, but if they are not well... The actions of their boss is nothing less than McCarthyism. First he betrayed their privacy by going public, second he punished them with formal charges, third he has sentenced them without a trial.


And now they want a Secret Board on Parliamentary Conduct. How nice. We definitely need secret boards. Let's make them untouchable as well. Maybe Trudeau could give Putin a call for some KGB tips.