Confessions of a Climate Change Denier

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,794
460
83
Canada committed to reaching climate-change deal, French President says


French President Francois Hollande says he has “no reason to doubt” Canada’s commitment to reaching a global agreement for addressing climate change.

France will host the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris next year, where governments will seek to come to a legally-binding agreement on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Speaking in Ottawa during a three-day visit to Canada, Mr. Hollande said there are a number of steps that must be taken in the coming months for the 2015 conference in Paris to be successful.



“I have no reason to doubt that Canada will be fully committed during each of these steps on the way to the Paris conference,” Mr. Hollande said. “We would like to avoid what happened in Denmark, in Copenhagen, where the heads of state and governments thought they could reach an agreement in the very few, last few hours. And this is not possible, we have to find an agreement within the coming months.”

His comments come one day after the United Nations released a landmark document outlining a dire global future if more is not done to mitigate the threat of climate change.

Mr. Harper said Canada is bringing down greenhouse gas emissions, but government figures released earlier this year suggest there is little chance Canada will meet the targets it agreed to during the last climate conference in Copenhagen, Denmark.

The Prime Minister said Canada is taking a sector-by-sector approach to regulations on greenhouse gas emissions and will ban and phase out coal-fired electricity generation. “So look, I think we have a good story to tell, but we recognize, as obviously does France, that there’s a lot of work to be done at the international level to get what all of us want, which is a global agreement that will create binding obligations on all major emitters.”

Mr. Hollande also urged developed countries to contribute to the Green Climate Fund, adding that France will be providing $1-billion toward the fund. “And I call upon all the countries that can contribute to do so as well,” he said.

The French President is on a multi-day visit to Canada, which began with a trip to Banff, Alta., a sign he is interested in boosting his country’s relationship with Canada’s western provinces. He spoke in Parliament on Monday and will travel to Quebec.

During his visit to Ottawa, Mr. Hollande laid a wreath at the National War Memorial, where Corporal Nathan Cirillo was gunned down in an attack on Oct. 22. Cpl. Cirillo had been guarding the memorial when he was shot. His attacker then went to Parliament Hill and forced his way into Centre Block. He was shot dead by security officers.

Mr. Hollande expressed sympathy for the attack, which he referred to as “terrorist-inspired.”

Follow Kim Mackrael on Twitter: @kimmackrael

Hollande in Canada: Desmarais on why we should ratify CETA
French president making historical trip to western Canada
The next climate deal is doomed. But our planet isn’t doomed yet

Canada committed to reaching climate-change deal, French President says - The Globe and Mail
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,794
460
83
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Substantiate--sure. Prove--no. Proof is a logical construct; it doesn't exist in science.

invariably, it's always the loudest blowhard, barking deniers that have no grasp of the fundamentals!

PS - I use global warming too in certain company... Works wonders in getting the blood pressure up among the true believers in the cult

obviously, both terms are still in use/relevant... apparently you don't understand the distinction - go figure.

Maybe he can play a role in a climate crisis movie... That's expert enough to dictate global policy

always the low-hanging fruit for you, hey? It would be so easy to have a chuckle-fest over some of the more prominent spokespersons for the denial movement... but then, that's just more of your type of nonsense! Who would really go there?
 

Zipperfish

House Member
Apr 12, 2013
3,688
0
36
Vancouver
Green groups hindering global warming fight with ‘alarmist’ warnings: UN scientists | National Post

Green groups have been unhelpfully “alarmist” in arguing for tackling global warming, but the world must take urgent and radical action to prevent dangerous climate change, leading UN scientists said Sunday.

Some claims that non-governmental organizations have made about climate change “have undoubtedly been exaggerated”, Prof Myles Allen, one of the lead authors of a major new report from the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said.
“NGOs have at times been alarmist over climate change … but the IPCC has been very clear and measured throughout. I think alarmism on any issue is unhelpful.”

He suggested this had resulted in the general public believing that “climate change is just all about melting ice caps and the Arctic” even though “the reality is climate change is about the weather changing in many parts of the world including where many people live.”

(see link for more)
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Fantastic... The IPCC.... Got a lot of their factual info from East Anglia U, right?

what about it? Nothing that couldn't have been corroborated elsewhere; say NOAA, NCDC, NASA. I noticed you barked out a similar comment about UEA recently in another thread... one of your go-to talking points?

Say, didn't that venerable group publish stats on the acceptance rate(s) of the scientific community in the high 90s?.... As I recall, there were a very large number of those folks that were forced to having to publicly 'correct' the IPCC in mistakenly identifying them as supporters... Some even filed lawsuits to force the 'correction'Next step - Prove it

cap'nHand, that reads like another of your porkies!
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
invariably, it's always the loudest blowhard, barking deniers that have no grasp of the fundamentals!

... Still no proof, eh?

Sad man, that's really sad

obviously, both terms are still in use/relevant... apparently you don't understand the distinction - go figure.

Considering that neither position has any facts upon which to stand, I'd say that irrelevant is a more appropriate word.

always the low-hanging fruit for you, hey? It would be so easy to have a chuckle-fest over some of the more prominent spokespersons for the denial movement... but then, that's just more of your type of nonsense! Who would really go there?

Everything, and I mean every theory, projection, model, forecast, etc has fallen squarely on it's face.

It's all low hanging fruit champ

Just for you Smackdaddy! ha ha ha


No doubt sponsored by this guy



what about it? Nothing that couldn't have been corroborated elsewhere; say NOAA, NCDC, NASA. I noticed you barked out a similar comment about UEA recently in another thread... one of your go-to talking points?

cap'nHand, that reads like another of your porkies!


I can see that the scandalous results hurt you badly... Resorting to personal attacks and pseudo-supporting info.

Can we assume that this is your last stand?.. Your Little Big Horn Col Custer?
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
what about it? Nothing that couldn't have been corroborated elsewhere; say NOAA, NCDC, NASA. I noticed you barked out a similar comment about UEA recently in another thread... one of your go-to talking points?



cap'nHand, that reads like another of your porkies!

You know you are just one more in a long line of truthers that have trolled on here for years. None of them have ever proven that man has anything to do with global warming or if it even exists. Average temperatures over the last 10 years would suggest that it isn't happening. The IPCC has been proven many times to be a fraud that manipulates data in an attempt to justify giving our money to third world countries. If China and India ever agree to clean up their mess we will do more to ours but we are not going to bankrupt our economy while two big polluters do nothing. All of you sound like the ecoterrorists that tried to convince the gullible that trees never grow back after logging in BC. Make a big noise but contribute nothing.