That'd launch a fury of cherry-picking, with hairsplitting on political orientation of this or that charity and arcane numerology to "prove" bias one way or the other. Why bother?
Do you know what an audit is?
List the charities they have audited, I suppose, would be the easiest way.
List the charities they have audited, I suppose, would be the easiest way.
So what's your definition of regularly? Since there is over 80,000 charities in canada, CRA would have to audit close to 170/week just to hit everyone of them every ten years.
How many auditors do you think they have? Do you think they are capable of achieving a ten year cycle and is that regular enough for you?
I do. I just want to look at Fantasyland VFD financials. Cough up.
WTF? Quit being a f-cking creep.
What is the name of the VFD so we can look up financials of the "never been audited VFD" and put this to rest? While you're at it list the farm subsidies and explain the VFF tax credit and how Corps can use the VFF tax credit to get free money in your own words considering this is your proof for several bizarre claims so put down your crack pipe and get the f-ck on it ya goddam creep.
Your answers are what answer everything. Get busy and post or f-ck off.
Not upset at all.
Is that what you're going on about?
Is there any specific reason charity and non profit financials are available to the public online? Can anyone audit publicly available charity/non-profits or just CRA? Do the organizations hire a third party to do audits of their financials as required by CRA?
You claim it's hard to track money through a non.profit like a VFD so cough up the name of the one you claim to be part of and let's audit.
An honest org can account for every penny. If it can't be tracked there is theiving fraudulent liars involved. Do you know any liars who claim to be in an org like a VFD?
I know It upsets you that we haven't been audited in 40 years. Deal with it...or don't.
Prove it. Give a name.
Why? Maybe because you're an admitted liar?
That'd launch a fury of cherry-picking, with hairsplitting on political orientation of this or that charity and arcane numerology to "prove" bias one way or the other. Why bother?
Based on whose determination? The Toronto Star? The Toronto Sun? Since nobody is unbiased you will never get agreement from anybody.
That would be a pretty serious breach of confidentiality... Those that were proven to have broken the rules is one thing, but those that didn't would be (rightfully) howling bloody murder