16% of Britons believe gay sex should be ‘outlawed’ – survey

[CDNBear]

It seems to me like you were being sarcastic.

I blame the poor state of the UK education system.

And why do you say that I want to have sex with my own sister?

Because you told us how you use a condom to make sure you don't mess up your gene puddle.

How would you like it if I said that you, as a pro-gay person, wanted to have sex with a man?

I wouldn't care. Only a Neanderthal thinks weaponizing homosexuality would upset someone.

Thankfully I was educated in Canada.

 

[SLM]

 

[Blackleaf]

I blame the poor state of the UK education system.

Yours is even worse.

Because you told us how you use a condom to make sure you don't mess up your gene puddle.

No, I didn't. Someone said that they are against brother and sister having sex because it could lead to div babies And I pointed out that there is an easy solution to that problem - wear a condom. The argument that sibling sex shouldn't be allowed because it could lead to a div baby then flies out of the window.

I wouldn't care. Only a Neanderthal thinks weaponizing homosexuality would upset someone.

Some people would say that you could say exactly the same for people who are against sibling sex or other types of people who want to have sex with each other but which society frowns upon.

Someone could easily say that only Neanderthals are against sibling sex between consenting adults.

Thankfully I was educated in Canada.

A country with a worse education system than Britain.

 

[CDNBear]

Yours is even worse.

Of course you'd say that, look where you were educated.

I merely have to sight all the explaining that has to be made to you as proof of where the issue truly lays.

Some people would say that you could say exactly the same for people who are against sibling sex or other types of people who want to have sex with each other but which society frowns upon.

You can think people who find your love for your adult sister abhorrent, in any way you want.

Someone could easily say that only Neanderthals are against sibling sex between consenting adults.

Then you would be self loathing.

A country with a worse education system than Britain.

You've already proven that to be false.

 

[taxslave]

Is that the 16% that prefer sheep?

 

[CDNBear]

Is that the 16% that prefer sheep?

Bwaaahahahaha!

Or should that be...

Baaahahahaha!

 

[Blackleaf]

Of course you'd say that, look where you were educated.

I merely have to sight all the explaining that has to be made to you as proof of where the issue truly lays.

Of course I would say it, because I've read the article explaining the study which showed that Britain's education system in ranked the sixth-best in the world, behind four Asian countries and Finland.

You can think people who find your love for your adult sister abhorrent, in any way you want.

Why do YOU find sibling sex abhorrent? Why are you so intolerant?

Then you would be self loathing.

That someone includes you. You're an intolerant Neanderthal. This is the 21st Century and yet you want to make it unlawful for two consenting adults who love each other to have sex. Why? What harm does it do?

You've already proven that to be false.

I've proven that it's true several times. I've even posted the link with the related article on it on this forum a few times.

 

[SLM]

I believe he's now one tiny step away from "I know you are but what am I"

 

[CDNBear]

Of course I would say it, because I've read the article explaining the study which showed that Britain's education system in ranked the sixth-best in the world, behind four Asian countries and Finland.

You do realize...

Why do YOU find sibling sex abhorrent? Why are you so intolerant?

That proves you wrong, right?

That someone includes you. You're an intolerant Neanderthal. This is the 21st Century and yet you want to make it unlawful for two consenting adults who love each other to have sex. Why? What harm does it do?

And so does that...

I've proven that it's true several times. I've even posted the link with the related article on it on this forum a few times.

No you haven't, don't be silly.

See above for all the proof that's needed.

 

[Blackleaf]

I believe he's now one tiny step away from "I know you are but what am I"

I've already taken one huge step in highlighting the hypocrisy from the pro-gay people.

"Two consenting adult males should be allowed to have sex with each other! It's the 21st Century! Only bigots are against such a thing! We should show more tolerance and show the Neanderthals that society now accepts such a thing!"

but....

"Brother and sister, who are both consenting adults, having sex with each other? URRRGGGHH!! DISGUSTING AND DEPRAVED!! Society should now allow such depravity!! It is evil and just... wrong! BAN IT! These dirty, fithy individuals should be locked up!!!!!!!!!"

The stench of hypocrisy from the pro-gay faction is overpowering. They're just as bigoted towards certain other types of people having sex with each other as the homophobes are supposed to be towards gays having sex with each other.

 

[SLM]

I've already taken one huge step in highlighting the hypocrisy from the pro-gay people.

"Two consenting adult males should be allowed to have sex with each other! It's the 21st Century! Only bigots are against such a thing! We should show more tolerance and show the Neanderthals that society now accepts such a thing!"

but....

"Brother and sister, who are both consenting adults, having sex with each other? URRRGGGHH!! DISGUSTING AND DEPRAVED!! Society should now allow such depravity!! It is evil and just... wrong! BAN IT!"

The stench of hypocrisy is overpowering.

LMAO.

Just because you put quotation marks around something doesn't mean that either of us actually said it.

Oxford caliber debate tactics this one has. LOL

 

[CDNBear]

Lolz

Geez dude, stalk people much?

You know the board has rules against that.

LMAO.

Just because you put quotation marks around something doesn't mean that either of us actually said it.

But SLM!!! He put quotations around it!

Oxford caliber debate tactics this one has. LOL

I blame the poor education system in the UK.

 

[SLM]

Geez dude, stalk people much?

You know the board has rules against that.

Shush now, he's making an important point.!

But SLM!!! He put quotations around it!

Maybe this is why he thinks he wins all the time. He's basing on imaginary arguments he has.

That's really kind of sad, don't you think.

 

[CDNBear]

That's really kind of sad, don't you think.

Not nearly as sad as our personal stalker and the poor state of Briddish education.

 

[SLM]

Not nearly as sad as our personal stalker and the poor state of Briddish education.

I'm betting they were both drop outs. Cautionary tales really.

Kids! Stay in school!

 

[WLDB]

All that tlak of "giving birth to deformed children" flies out the window if, for example, the guy wears a condom.

Im living proof that condoms are not 100% effective.

 

[JLM]

Geez dude, stalk people much?

You know the board has rules against that.

But SLM!!! He put quotations around it!

I blame the poor education system in the UK.

This guy (Cannuck) is ambidextrous, he can be an idiot on any thread. -

 

[WLDB]

Yet their legendary "tolerance" flies out the window when you mention that, using that logic, we should legalise sibling sex between consenting adults because, after all, what harm does it do?

It is legal. They cant marry but can have all the sex they want.

"Brother and sister, who are both consenting adults, having sex with each other? URRRGGGHH!! DISGUSTING AND DEPRAVED!! Society should now allow such depravity!! It is evil and just... wrong! BAN IT! These dirty, fithy individuals should be locked up!!!!!!!!!"

The stench of hypocrisy from the pro-gay faction is overpowering. They're just as bigoted towards certain other types of people having sex with each other as the homophobes are supposed to be towards gays having sex with each other.

So far you are the only one on this thread who has said anything against sibling sex. Everyone else on the thread seems to be pretty indifferent to it. It doesnt harm anyone and is not our business if people chose to do that.

 

[SLM]

So far you are the only one on this thread who has said anything against sibling sex. Everyone else on the thread seems to be pretty indifferent to it. It doesnt harm anyone and is not our business if people chose to do that.

He has a point to make you see and it's up to the rest of us to react the way he thinks we should react in order for him to make his point. And if we don't? Well, he won't let that stop him that's for sure!

 

[bluebyrd35]

Have you not heard of contraceptives?

All that tlak of "giving birth to deformed children" flies out the window if, for example, the guy wears a condom.

LOL...Seems you missed the whole point. I simply was pointing out where the human aversion to breeding with close relatives came from and why we have mostly stopped. And back when the human race was young, there were no contraceptives. In fact, still today, good practicing Catholics are still forbidden to use them. By the time we get the homophobes, and the religious ones sorted, we will have pillaged the earth so badly, we will be extinct..


Nobody is holding a gun to your head to have heterosexual relationships, so why get your knickers in a knot about what others do. If a relationship is consensual and they are of age, it is none of your business.


By the way, all animal species, swing both ways. Of course they are more enlightened than the human species, they not only tolerate them but use them in a multitude of ways, depending on the species.